You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Paine

Comments

In: Bannings  — view comment
In one of those discussions, I asked why he or she did not simply withdraw. The answer was that participation was experienced as a compulsion. I get t...
December 03, 2025 at 21:10
How does it not become a form of arguing on the basis of authority? Is there a modal logic answer to that question?
December 03, 2025 at 01:34
Very helpful quotation.
December 03, 2025 at 01:10
I object to that idea. I would rather have it be a resource for people who use it to supplement their limitations. Don't we all disagree enough withou...
December 03, 2025 at 01:05
I wonder where linguistics, as a science, fits into Pinker's model. Before trying to map a "mental" substratum for the activity, it would be good to h...
December 02, 2025 at 23:40
Glad to hear the Currently Reading thread will continue.
December 01, 2025 at 23:20
One way to hear the PI §329 statement is that some kinds of internal dialogue demonstrate that the thinking through using language is where thinking w...
December 01, 2025 at 23:08
That is a good observation. Kant had figured that he had nailed down the uses of psychology but the time since then has proven otherwise.
November 30, 2025 at 22:19
There, again, reference is made to an intuition we do not possess but can imagine as possible. There is an interesting discussion much later in the bo...
November 30, 2025 at 17:16
Then all my efforts to distinguish the two in the text have been for naught.
November 29, 2025 at 02:19
All of the text I quoted clearly rules out the transcendental object being an appearance. Where, in the text, do you see the transcendental object bei...
November 29, 2025 at 01:51
That is one line of interpretation. There are others. I will leave it be for now. This place has many discussions concerning this topic. Till the next...
November 29, 2025 at 01:00
In your mind, is there a set of stuff that is true and other stuff that is demonstrably false?
November 28, 2025 at 23:41
Well, I was not claiming the perspective I presented was the only one to consider. It was only to observe that the City of Words is not put forward in...
November 28, 2025 at 23:22
I did not mean to provide an opposing argument, only to clarify that I was not trying to avoid the "transcendental" in your comment.
November 28, 2025 at 19:45
Both may be thought "transcendentally" but are not identical. The point of my looking at the precise way Kant expresses the transcendental object was ...
November 28, 2025 at 18:08
The work as whole deals with looking for an answer to whether justice is merely whatever the powerful say it is. The City of Words is a mirror to the ...
November 27, 2025 at 18:22
That remark overlooks the role of the transcendental object in Kant's argument. Here it is how it is presented in A: The same formulation is used in B...
November 27, 2025 at 18:05
Maybe you two should have this argument in a Nietzsche specific conversation.
November 26, 2025 at 00:10
That paper is narrowly focused on a particular set of issues. The Metaphysics draws sharp differences between the ease with which we can observe kinds...
November 24, 2025 at 00:51
Good points. One of the aspects of "a formerly good person" that is presented in the drama is how a "line of credit" of respectability runs out eventu...
November 22, 2025 at 23:11
Please do not be sorry. Being very specific about agreement and disagreement helps me look for what I am trying to find. I was not speaking ironically...
November 22, 2025 at 00:01
Pardon my penchant for analogy. If you work in a restaurant, you try to separate stored goods from actual food production. And the idea is central to ...
November 21, 2025 at 23:35
Yes. I like the way you carefully qualified the agreement.
November 21, 2025 at 22:19
Now that you are doing it, it seems no brainer to separate the storage room from the grille.
November 21, 2025 at 20:51
I like that answer because it opens up ancient through to modern iterations without putting a finger on the scale regarding them.
November 21, 2025 at 20:47
Causal agency is the language of practical reason. I guess I am trying to see a flip side to that where Kant says we have an experience of ourselves t...
November 21, 2025 at 20:40
In Meditations, Descartes wonders if all his experiences in the world are merely dreams and illusion. He asks if the people he sees are machines prete...
November 21, 2025 at 18:24
Are you suggesting that reading the actual book would be misguided?
November 20, 2025 at 23:31
That is a good translation. Apostle is also good.
November 20, 2025 at 23:29
Or read the book itself. If one wants to swim, jump into the pool.
November 20, 2025 at 23:24
I was not arguing against that idea. It is a received opinion. I figure we cannot know for sure. What the writing talks about is the best indication o...
November 20, 2025 at 23:11
For Aristotle, "Physics" is an investigation about "Phusis" or Nature. How ever it came to be called "Metaphysics", that book is concerned with "being...
November 20, 2025 at 23:05
I agree that Kant's argument does not directly approach the thesis of solipsism. Kant introduced the goal of his Refutation as: It is toward this end ...
November 20, 2025 at 22:53
For Kant, in his time, the statement that awareness of self required the existence of "exterior" things was his argument against solipsism.
November 20, 2025 at 01:41
I can deal with that challenge tomorrow. I will quote from the text I have been referring to and link it to other sections of the other Critiques.
November 20, 2025 at 01:17
Then what will be the difference between our points of view? Will you no longer challenge what I have said in the past as you just did? I would rather...
November 20, 2025 at 01:04
I am not going to say more until we deal with your charges about my agenda.
November 20, 2025 at 00:38
That is not the case. I have argued extensively against Gerson's interpretation of materialism as a general idea in Plato and subsequent literature. A...
November 20, 2025 at 00:32
November 20, 2025 at 00:00
Pretty contemptuous last word. I will leave you with it.
November 19, 2025 at 23:59
I am trying to avoid being cryptic by referencing specific portions of the actual text. I was sincere in my general thumbnail that you asked for. But ...
November 19, 2025 at 23:50
The quote you provided from SEP comes from a particular contrast between Kant and Hume. The argument about what the "I" is in the context of represent...
November 19, 2025 at 23:04
Since the intuitions are separated from the processes of reason a priori, differences of experience are neither what Descartes nor Berkeley described,...
November 19, 2025 at 22:04
November 19, 2025 at 21:42
It sounds like what you are calling "solipsism" is what other people refer to as single individuals.
November 19, 2025 at 21:39
That is more of an argument toward accepting an "ontological" limit than saying: The Refutation of Idealism section previously linked to argues agains...
November 19, 2025 at 21:37
This is why I resisted giving a summary. Perhaps you could provide references that support your interpretation. On the surface, your description does ...
November 19, 2025 at 21:21
We do not have access to an "I" as a given before our experience in the world. So, when we approach the matter as if that is not a critical feature of...
November 19, 2025 at 21:07
I was having fun, too. Maybe it was too culturally limited to my ruralism.
November 19, 2025 at 20:52