You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Baden

Comments

And I think many who take up arms against political correctness probably feel the same way. Makes me wonder sometimes where the points of disagreement...
March 14, 2019 at 16:18
For example, I don't think it's appropriate to call children who have learning disabilities, 'mongoloids' or 'retards'. I, like most people, prefer PC...
March 14, 2019 at 16:06
You may have a point there. I still don't think the overall critique of political correctness is very powerful though. Attacks on it almost always ten...
March 14, 2019 at 15:56
Ok, well, I have no sympathy for her considering her background whatever his motives were. But it doesn't seem a very good illustration of why politic...
March 14, 2019 at 15:29
Where did I say I disapprove of the prank? He embarrassed her primarily for being a racist not for being politically correct. It makes zero sense othe...
March 14, 2019 at 15:18
Hehe, good call. :eyes:
March 13, 2019 at 20:59
The video has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with embarrassing a minor celebrity who has made past racist comments. Btw...
March 12, 2019 at 22:18
In: Brexit  — view comment
It's Ok, no-one is listening. Most likely outcome now is a delay followed by UK capitulating further to customs union arrangement or final say referen...
March 12, 2019 at 21:36
I'm superficial snooty common decency daddy. The TPS must be catching though.
March 12, 2019 at 16:59
The deep salt-of-the-earth guy with Tourette's posting syndrome.
March 12, 2019 at 16:55
And then Badenetta's daddy mysteriously expired on 9999 posts. True story.
March 12, 2019 at 16:49
Wonder where your phobia of anything that smacks of common decency springs from? Let's analyze... :eyes:
March 12, 2019 at 16:09
On the one hand, the rebuke could be seen as a purely political decision devoid of any real ethical basis. On the other, anti-semitism is very real, v...
March 10, 2019 at 20:49
Thanks @"Noah Te Stroete". :strong:
March 10, 2019 at 20:34
Good to hear. You're both decent blokes (except for @"Hanover", of course).
March 08, 2019 at 21:24
Depends on the OP, but certainly more effort in writing with clarity and precision there would help offset the issue. For example, a couple of lines a...
March 08, 2019 at 21:19
Agreed. Here's my burnt offering: What is the night if not a cartwheel on the frenzied bust of day? A shape scraped from concrete longings To stay the...
March 08, 2019 at 20:04
:sparkle: :pray:
March 08, 2019 at 17:15
Delete the posts in question. It's inevitable you'll get posters talking past each other especially as a lot of posts here are likely written while mu...
March 07, 2019 at 23:48
No, rocks are not always just rocks. And I'll thank you not to try that one on again.
March 07, 2019 at 21:55
So, if degree of harm intended and achieved is relevant to morality, what is your justification for bracketing out emotional harm given, apart from co...
March 07, 2019 at 21:50
Not necessarily. So, I posit they can't. OK, so morality is about degree of harm then?
March 07, 2019 at 21:28
It's possible to emotionally torture someone to the point where they commit suicide. And you are saying you wouldn't consider that immoral? Simply bec...
March 07, 2019 at 21:03
Apropos: General: https://rsds.org/physical-pain-emotional-pain/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-causes-chest-pains/ https://ideas.ted...
March 07, 2019 at 20:47
Ok, that's fair enough.
March 07, 2019 at 20:37
You will never reach an exhaustive qualification of criteria. And there's little point in trying. The point is there are cases like the one I gave tha...
March 07, 2019 at 20:36
You'll have to ask them. But in general, we all try to walk the line between being permissive and illiberal, and someone will always be unhappy.
March 07, 2019 at 20:22
Sounds like a false dilemma fallacy there. Things can be more or less immoral. The examples you gave are extremely immoral due to the physical violenc...
March 07, 2019 at 20:07
One discussion out of hundreds does not a stinking hellhole cesspit make. If every discussion, or even a significant minority of discussions here, wer...
March 07, 2019 at 20:02
The physical characteristics of different human groups aren't determinative of any ethically relevant behaviour; ergo, racism is first and foremost a ...
March 07, 2019 at 18:25
You don't need to apologize. For most, it's not at all confusing. A very few people might not understand what it means because they look at -ism words...
March 07, 2019 at 18:10
No worries. :up:
March 07, 2019 at 09:44
You can redo it if you like.
March 07, 2019 at 09:43
I think so, and I think it would have been better if you'd put that in the title too. As you said yourself in the conversation, the title was misleadi...
March 07, 2019 at 09:43
Not in the sense of command of the language or anything. That was totally fine. But I think paragraphs like this: "So, is Climate Change real or could...
March 07, 2019 at 09:36
I deleted it because it wasn't a very well written or clear OP, didn't seem to be going anywhere, and your last post was, and I quote "I regret starti...
March 07, 2019 at 08:31
Just so this is crystal clear, racism refers to a set of behaviours as well as a set of beliefs. The behaviours are not some separate thing and parsin...
March 06, 2019 at 17:41
Dictionary result for racism /?re?s?z(?)m/Submit noun prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on t...
March 06, 2019 at 17:32
Looks like he's determined to be Agu's successor to the 10,000. And you're likely to pip me for bronze. Unless I keep making posts like this... :chin:
March 06, 2019 at 14:40
Here's a much more accurate definition: Definition: A noun is a member of a syntactic class that includes words which refer to people, places, things,...
March 06, 2019 at 08:06
That's just a pedagogical shortcut. For example, "nothingness" is a noun.
March 06, 2019 at 07:34
It's one discussion out of hundreds in the Lounge. Just ignore it like most of the rest of us do.
March 06, 2019 at 06:54
It's the Lounge. That is all.
March 05, 2019 at 21:59
I wouldn't take it too seriously. Within the past few days, he's held up Socrates as a hero and railed against Kant as a purveyor of nonsense.
March 05, 2019 at 21:57
My sister's an actor (though not major and not involved in politics), so I readily admit to a possible bias in their favour here!
March 05, 2019 at 17:15
Foe very major actor, there are a thousand minor ones. And for every major actor actively involved in politics, there are probably a dozen who aren't....
March 05, 2019 at 17:14
Missed the boat on this question a bit, so excuse me if I'm repeating stuff others have said. Anyway, I'd want to avoid a situation where you have ide...
March 05, 2019 at 17:08
Anyhow, late and got work to do. Talk more anon.
March 04, 2019 at 22:57
I'm ok with using that term*. It doesn't affect the gist of what I'm saying. I'm in line with this: If that helps. *The "deciding" is in the figuring ...
March 04, 2019 at 22:55
Again, I mean in principle, not necessarily in practice. There doesn't have to be a decision on meaning only the theoretical possibility of one to all...
March 04, 2019 at 22:52