Ayn Rand was a whiny little bitch
Ayn Rand got PTSD from the Bolshevik Revolution, a little whiny bitch who couldn’t handle her trauma. Furthermore, the Ayn Rand followers who are stalking me are little bitches, too, cowards who couldn’t handle all of the shit they put me through if the tables were turned. They talk a big game, but it’s funny that they always target me in groups when I’m by myself. Take a swing next time, wimps! :P :D
Comments (84)
You don't pray?
I pray you grow a pair.
So that you have something to suck on?
So I can kick them into your throat.
Your mum's a throat.
"Stroete" suggests your ancestors lived in a filthy marsh.
Me: Hey, what’s your name?
S: Sissy
Me: Fuck you, Sissy.
What's that? Sorry, I wasn't paying attention because I was watching your entire family roll around in a marsh like filthy animals.
Where we evolved into men with balls, not into talking vaginas.
So your mother was a man with balls?
My mother wasn’t a Te Stroete, moron.
Well then at least she didn't spend all day rolling around in a marsh! At least until she met your father.
And what did your mom’s vagina say when you came out of it? “Damn. Too late for an abortion.”
Vaginas can't speak. Except for the Holy Vagina up above. He can do anything, apparently, if you believe the fairytales.
That’s almost right. Your talking vagina family is the exception. I guess you were created in His image.
We all were, or so the story goes. So we're all talking vaginas, even you and your talking vagina family who spend all day rolling around in a marsh.
You’re running out of interesting things to say it seems. So, you might want to put your thinking cap on. Or do you put that on your vagina?
My thinking cap is also my badass cap. And I put it on my head, as opposed to my giant balls. I'm wearing it right now, as it happens. I save my giant balls for your mother. The cap would get in the way.
Me: (yawn)
S: (queef)
Later, shitting vagina.
Can I nominate this thread for the best duet piece of bullshit on a philosophy form of the year award?
I have already done some research to find the ideal trophy.
This is perfect in how it represents the participation of the members. Always putting their feet in it.
If @Baden said that about me, then he can eat a dick.
And to what, pray tell, are you referring?
That you have to work really fucking if you want to live a productive and purposeful life.
There were a few other things that she said that have been show to be true, but it was so long ago that I read her works that I don't remember. She is on the list of books to re-read when i have time.
No, actually I came to make fun of you.
Do you think that the trophy should be made of bronze? Or should we give it its real value and used recycled plastic trash?
:cool:
Bronze. That way it'll do more damage when I bash you over the head with it.
If he's cool, which he definitely isn't, it's only because he has a sharp tongue like me.
Did you notice that HE never denied having tits? :gasp:
Maybe we should re-think what we have surmised about other members of the forum. :chin:
Thanks. I really don’t know why @S hates me so much. I thought for a minute a few weeks back that we bonded over “Rick and Mortie”, but that didn’t last. I know he despises people who believe in God, but I’m not judgmental about his atheism, so I don’t know what his problem is.
Ah jeez, Rick. I thought that you understood that this was just a bit of fun. Chin up, wipe those tears from your vagina. @Hanover would have known. Why can't you be more like Hanover?
It is always a shame when people can't be more like me.
For clarification, is having a vagina a bad thing?
It’s a perfectly fine thing. Vaginas are actually tougher than testicles, but telling a male chauvinist they have a vagina is like using their own gun against them. It’s poetic justice.
I can have fun just as well as the next bloke, but it got to a point where I wasn’t sure if this was pure fun or if you really harbored animosity towards me. I can get [belch] shwifty, too. Wubba lubba dub dub.
It's the Lounge. That is all.
Yep, that is where you can sit around and watch people talk all kinds of shit. :cool:
You should hear the jabs between me and my 18 year-old son. We take shit-talking to whole new levels. I love that shit-head! Love you, William, pussy that you are! :heart:
There was a lounge when I left. It wasn't as if it was a /hum/ sub that would make even the dirtbag left feel like maybe they've been immature long enough and should start looking for a job with a good 401k.
Fair enough. I guess the old TPF always lacked containment boards. :confused:
It's one discussion out of hundreds in the Lounge. Just ignore it like most of the rest of us do.
There was the un-modded section back at TPF, and that used to get some serious flaming going on it.
Yeah, that's right. :wink:
Quoting Baden
I had been going to ignore this whole immature rant. Including stuff like:
Quoting S
Quoting Sir2u
The title itself I simply rolled my eyes at and felt utter contempt at such expression.
However, given that someone has raised an objection I feel obliged to add my thoughts. I expect more object but can't be bothered complaining, given the attitude of the moderator(s).
It might just be one out of many, and it is in the Lounge where apparently anything goes but really, this is an abomination. It can't be ignored if this is still to be considered a quality site.
A 'Lounge' indeed. More like a stinking hellhole of cesspit filled with outpourings from the sexist and the disturbed who think themselves hilarious.
Quoting Baden
Why not ?
One discussion out of hundreds does not a stinking hellhole cesspit make. If every discussion, or even a significant minority of discussions here, were like this, we might have a problem. As it is, I don't see any reason to give it attention or to get upset by it.
Quoting Amity
We can and might. It was a joke.
You are right. I was referring to the thread but you know how shit spreads...or how one rotten apple spoils the whole barrel...
Quoting Baden
Fair enough. Do other moderators hold the same view about this kind of 'discussion' ?
It is not about being upset, it is about challenging online behaviour.
Quoting Baden
A joke ?
In what sense ?
You'll have to ask them. But in general, we all try to walk the line between being permissive and illiberal, and someone will always be unhappy.
I appreciate the fine line and degree of tolerance required, especially in a philosophy forum.
I have said all that I needed to.
Ok, that's fair enough.
Anyone who would stick up for someone as purely evil as Ayn Rand is no friend of mine. Besides, the title of the thread was directed at Ron Johnson’s clan more so than the evil witch herself. If you only knew what I’ve been through in the 15 years since leaving his factory and the eight years since he became a US senator, then you might begin to understand.
Am I disturbed? Probably but that’s besides the point.
In case you haven't noticed, I'm not here to be friends with anyone. I don't even use any 'foes and friends' function where it exists on other forums. I ignore or not, as I will. I had ignored this thread until I decided to support someone else's objection.
At times you need to speak your mind. We all have our own ways.
Clearly, the Lounge is a safe place to let rip. The question is: can people be bothered to challenge, or not.
Sometimes I do. For better or worse...
Like I said to Baden, I am done.
Good for you! Just letting you know where you and I stand.
Not you though. Admit it, you love rolling around in the muck with the bad kids, so long as you can maintain some semblance of being above the fray. :grin:
:snicker:
Or one rotten killjoy ruins the fun. Yep, certainly wouldn't want that to spread.
Quoting Amity
Ladies and gentleman, I believe we have ourselves a white knight.
Sweet! Alrighty then, let's continue. :party:
Now, where were we...? I think when we left off, @Noah Te Stroete was wiping the tears from his vagina. Are you done crying, yet?
[I]Some[/I]times? :brow:
I was being charitable. (My left brain is yelling at my right brain right now.) You’re still a dick. :kiss:
Ergh! How revolting. Kill it with fire.
Quoting Noah Te Stroete
Come now, we all know you don't have a brain.
Quoting Noah Te Stroete
That's more like it. You had me worried for a second there.
I have more than one, but at least mine aren’t up my ass! :lol:
It's quality, not quantity. You could have a hundred, but you'll never be as smart as me.
Smartass
Thank you.
But you could not resist coming to see what was happening could you. :brow:
Well, yes I did resist.And had dismissed it from mind, even if there was a niggling doubt that it should be challenged. Just as Baden has advised others, it was ignored. Rightly or wrongly.
However, someone contacted me about the 'wits' on TPF and how a poster had complained to no apparent avail; the moderator response being that it is the Lounge. He also pointed out the interesting difference in moderation and tolerance levels between the main philo forums.
On OPC this 'discussion' would have been deleted and those involved given warnings or worse. It might be seen as oppressive, although plenty games are played there too. Fun for some to find a clever form of words which draw others to the limit and then stand back and smile as the poor manipulated sods cross over and get banned.
On PN hardly anything gets deleted. It might be seen as a place which has deteriorated in quality in direct contrast to its physical presence as The Philosophy Now magazine.
I think TPF has the Goldilocks effect. The principle of getting it just right - not too hot or cold - with a team of active and caring moderators. This forum is the best of the bunch, as far as my experience goes. So, thanks to all who keep it going.
Quoting S
Just as you are given freedom of expression, so I enjoy mine. My comments were never likely to kill joy.
Indeed, the very opposite has happened. Just as expected. It didn't take long for the buddies in arms to link up.
Someone earlier talked about respect for some and not others. So, some criteria of rightness or wrongness is carried along. My own view is that I respect all living beings as sentient creatures. I am no 'white knight' ( ladies and gentlemen :roll: ) but I will sometimes call out the behaviour and expressions of others.
I support those brave enough to stick their heads above the parapet and acknowledge a certain wisdom in those who choose to ignore.
That's all. Gotta go check my halo is sitting right :halo:
I dunno... sounds kinda white knight-ey to me.
What do you mean by 'white knight' ?
There are various definitions:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=White Knight
Also the way you used the term originally in an appeal to your 'audience' :
"Ladies and gentleman, I believe we have ourselves a white knight."
Sounded...I dunno...kinda like a persuasive rhetoric designed to capture a sense of ridicule and sway feelings against the alleged 'white knight'.
A kinda bully boy tactic.
Oh, that. You noticed? I thought that you might have been too busy gallantly riding in on your high horse to save the day, with your noble armour of pure brilliant white glistening in the dazzling sun, a reflection of your saintly nature and inestimable virtue.
When you go to bed tonight, this expression will haunt your dreams.
You don't deny the bully boy tactic, then ?
You’re a bully, too. That’s the thing. Even bullies have bullies. No one is innocent in this world, and nobody asked you to stick your nose in.
No. That I am not. However, those that bully generally have been bullied.
I recognise that.
If I am guilty of anything it is in disrupting the flow of this immature rant.
It is not bullying to raise an objection to unacceptable behaviour or expression.
It is bullying to try and stifle any such objection by ganging up and poking fun.
To make it so that the next person who has an objection is put off.
I understand why others wisely ignore - who needs a target painted on their back.
Nobody asked me to get involved - nobody has to. I am an independent thinker.
That is what philosophy is about. In my eyes.
I will say no more.