You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

Actually it kinda was. :grin:
May 25, 2020 at 05:11
This makes it no different from beliefs in general (reflected in our action or sayings). I can think of only two ways to interpret the idea that there...
May 25, 2020 at 03:04
I do, even here in the centre of a big city.
May 24, 2020 at 16:13
Interesting post Graeme.
May 24, 2020 at 12:19
But thanks for reading it @"Marchesk" :smile:
May 24, 2020 at 12:15
BTW, a lot of these criticisms are answered in the article or in the ensuing discussion that happened when it was first published years ago. I don't k...
May 24, 2020 at 12:15
Think about this some more, because it's the key to what I think is your misunderstanding. Of course, I deny the furniture in the head: there's just t...
May 24, 2020 at 12:07
That might work. You're welcome to send it in for us to see it.
May 24, 2020 at 07:55
That's very long.
May 24, 2020 at 07:24
Are you sure you read the article? :lol:
May 24, 2020 at 00:11
Thank you.
May 20, 2020 at 01:53
Quit trolling. If you have nothing to say about the topic, shut it.
May 20, 2020 at 01:50
:cry:
May 20, 2020 at 00:13
I can make a change to the template so that the copyright on articles shows the author instead of The Philosophy Forum as it does now. I'm not sure wh...
May 18, 2020 at 08:29
Yes. No.
May 15, 2020 at 19:13
Currently a rather pricey $53 from Amazon
May 14, 2020 at 14:12
Her book on On Certainty is very good too.
May 14, 2020 at 14:08
The best interpreter of Wittgenstein I've found.
May 14, 2020 at 14:05
The referendum was meant to be last month but it was pandemically postponed.
May 14, 2020 at 12:29
The German Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service, 1933, was an immoral law, no?
May 12, 2020 at 17:58
Love it. Nice analysis. https://images.theconversation.com/files/100924/original/image-20151105-16273-wcep3x.jpg
May 12, 2020 at 06:47
I voted yes, but it's paradoxical. In saying "we hold these Truths to be self-evident", we're making a choice. Natural rights are stipulated or assert...
May 12, 2020 at 06:36
Just ordered War and Peace.
May 11, 2020 at 09:46
Yeah, one of the first things they did in Antarctica was close all the bars and restaurants. As far as I can tell there's the untrustworthy authoritar...
May 10, 2020 at 06:34
They're outnumbered by Americans here and that seems to frustrate them. It's like when you corner a Tasmanian devil: even if you don't mean any harm, ...
May 10, 2020 at 05:54
It does grab me, because I've had the same thoughts, and my post was almost a reproach to my own tendency towards essentialism. This might be an unwel...
May 08, 2020 at 18:27
Taking this to its natural conclusion: we never listen to the entire piece. What then?
May 08, 2020 at 10:51
Well put.
May 08, 2020 at 10:48
The obvious question is: why is this important? What if you didn't hear the entire piece, and yet you loved it, you were able to analyze it and unders...
May 08, 2020 at 10:40
In: Brexit  — view comment
This is rubbish. Not only that but it weakens the case against the EU, as if the EU is only bad for the English, or that they're the only ones who can...
May 08, 2020 at 09:49
I haven't see it, but I heard about it recently when I saw this review by "ecomodernist" environmentalist Mark Lynas on Facebook: https://www.facebook...
May 08, 2020 at 09:29
Any time.
May 08, 2020 at 06:21
No problem. But I'm going to stand by my analysis until proven wrong :razz:
May 08, 2020 at 06:18
I wouldn't necessarily be against a "What Are You Into?" thread in the Lounge. Could be interesting (not that I'll be taking part).
May 08, 2020 at 06:14
Nobody cares, except for your sexual partners, and maybe some of your friends. This is what Baden was talking about: it's a sign of self-obsession tha...
May 08, 2020 at 06:09
Sure, but it doesn't follow that the way to persuade them is to follow the quoted advice, i.e., to use disclaimers and clarifications to remove all am...
May 07, 2020 at 18:07
Maybe I'm being too charitable.
May 07, 2020 at 16:17
:lol: :up:
May 07, 2020 at 15:49
You may be right, and I agree that aiming for clarity, concision, and logical comprehensiveness is not the recipe for a great work of philosophy. But ...
May 07, 2020 at 15:31
What's the problem? No, I don't think that's implied by what I said. But I don't really know what you mean. You're being too vague. Should we openly e...
May 07, 2020 at 15:12
Politics is public, sex is private (most of the time). The less private and sacred sex becomes, the less we are reticent to talk about it openly in pu...
May 07, 2020 at 14:57
@"boethius" Could it be that you have misunderstood this topic? It looks like it. The advice to assume your readers are stupid, lazy, and mean, is mer...
May 07, 2020 at 14:42
I think you're right. And in particular, fortifying your writing against mean readers can result in verbosity, with, as you say, "a fortress of discla...
May 07, 2020 at 11:15
Looks good. Added.
May 06, 2020 at 17:35
In: Bannings  — view comment
Because your benevolent overseers allow it.
May 06, 2020 at 15:56
In: Bannings  — view comment
In an unprecedented move, the staff has decided to unban @"Pfhorrest" after communicating with him by email. We're confident that the flaming was out ...
May 06, 2020 at 14:53
In: Bannings  — view comment
All right, I'm closing this now. Until the next time...
May 04, 2020 at 18:24
In: Bannings  — view comment
I see what you're saying, but I haven't seen flaming as bad as this for a very long time, perhaps never on this forum. The guidelines make it clear th...
May 04, 2020 at 14:39
In: Bannings  — view comment
Yes, it was about those comments. It was me who deleted them. And I did in fact give him a chance by first opting to warn him instead of banning insta...
May 04, 2020 at 13:00
In: Bannings  — view comment
@"Pfhorrest" was banned for some particularly deplorable flaming.
May 04, 2020 at 09:54