That's fine. But what does it mean to 'assume' a law of nature that isn't actually real? That's the crux of the problem of induction and the problem o...
Justify it? No. Not in the philosophical sense of the word justify. But you could justify it to yourself, and I don't know if most people really need ...
All nominalistic philosophies, to my mind, all lead to absolute skepticism, nihilism and basically Postmodernism. So I share this sentiment, that form...
I share this sentiment, but let me explain why it doesn't matter, whether you believe that or not. If you're not an aesthetic realist, if you are an a...
I like your idea, but I am an Idealist. Materiality has never been proven or demonstrated, just claimed. The only thing we have true access to in the ...
I am a qualified non-dualist. What that means is that there is, at once, both difference and nondifference. Duality and nonduality. How this can be ex...
It's definitely possible. There are two extremes. All positions are equally true and only seemingly different. (sort-of perennialism, universalism, pa...
Interesting. Well, I know emotivism because I once held that view. I don't know prescriptivism. If I did, that might shed some light on the answer. Bu...
Alright, science deals with particular sets of phenomena. Right? So, it deals with particular objects or things I see or perceive. For example, the ph...
" that my consciousness springs forth from and is contained within a deteriorating mass of biological complexity." Which is just an unproved assertion...
Well, in our tradition, there's no penultimate end to the world. Neither was there any true beginning to the world. It's just a cycle of things moving...
I don't see why. If there's no moral thing-in-itself than the number of positions you have on it are merely descriptions of a non-thing anyway. I'll p...
Comments