You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

BlueBanana

Comments

Don't get me wrong, I totally agree that self-awareness (or I'd maybe rather say sentience) causes suffering, but it's just worth it.
May 16, 2018 at 17:15
If they have memory, they can learn, and therefore they can be in a sense programmed through conditioning. So, do they have memory? Is memory a proper...
May 16, 2018 at 11:15
It would need the information the concept of cupness holds - or, some of that information. It doesn't need to compose all this knowledge into this abs...
May 16, 2018 at 10:57
Maybe so, but it's also the cause of joy and well-being, the positive feelings, which also with the negative feelings cause and allow the existence of...
May 16, 2018 at 09:40
Is the converse true? I think a robot works, although in a simplified way, like a human, making it possible for it to replicate the actions of conscio...
May 16, 2018 at 09:26
I wonder how Descartes would react to Siri :D anyway, I don't think the Turing test is a good method for detecting thinking process. A robot, or a zom...
May 16, 2018 at 09:08
It's your opinion that answer is sufficient.
May 15, 2018 at 10:12
So why isn't self-awareness needed for joy then? I'm eating, I'm relaxed, I'm in the company of my loved ones are all expressions of self-awareness ju...
May 14, 2018 at 17:03
It's also incorrect as it does not describe what the term "consciousness" refers to. As I stated, purposeful-responsiveness doesn't imply consciousnes...
May 13, 2018 at 22:23
No, it does those things through causality causing it to do those things. Doing those things does not imply consciousness being involved. Where is the...
May 13, 2018 at 19:52
More of "y should (appear to) be x". Sure the zombie would not have self-awareness in the sense that it wouldn't exactly have any knowledge at all, al...
May 13, 2018 at 18:52
I could agree with either that self-awareness isn't required for neither joy nor sorrow, or that non-human animals have enough self-awareness to be ca...
May 13, 2018 at 18:22
I'm aware, but to be used as a thought experiment, the concept should make sense. Furthermore, although the term isn't used in that context, when a sc...
May 13, 2018 at 18:13
Good question, as a thought experiment I think one could think of a conscious being losing their consciousness, thus having knowledge of the nature of...
May 13, 2018 at 14:27
As a counter-example, robots lack conscious visual experience but manage to react accordingly to information transferred by photons.
May 13, 2018 at 11:52
I don't see how the opposite is possible. How would a theist believe we are in a simulation? Why would someone make a simulation work seemingly fully ...
May 05, 2018 at 13:44
The economy only has an instrumental value. If the economic net gain also resulted in net gain in the happiness of people, slavery would then be moral...
April 12, 2018 at 12:59
Sex outside marriage is not necessarily cheating. One could have an open relationship.
April 10, 2018 at 14:41
Can you find a philosophical side to that?
April 09, 2018 at 21:52
In: Belief  — view comment
You've got it backwards. We don't use belief. That statement is a belief. That doesn't answer anything. That explanation is a usage of belief, not its...
April 09, 2018 at 09:36
Depends on the case. Could be anything. Well-being, happiness, money, health, etc. etc. But the distribution of money isn't equal. I see how the outco...
April 08, 2018 at 22:38
Only a centimeter? You've seen nothing. Speaking of which, I need to build myself a new house. Can anyone lend me some money?
April 04, 2018 at 20:33
It doesn't matter. You're the one experiencing the thought, and that's the relevant part. You can prove the existence of the experience to yourself by...
April 04, 2018 at 20:27
No, it's merely a means to an end, the end being the benefit, not the equality itself. If you could give 1€ to two poor people each, or 5€ for one of ...
April 04, 2018 at 14:44
It's also not enough to make it a non-moral issue. Can we apply the same to murdering people?
April 02, 2018 at 19:48
How would it not be? The question would be about evaluating one's own life against another sentient being's. Is deciding who lives and who dies not a ...
April 02, 2018 at 14:42
All the premises are justified, but that doesn't mean they're true. You forgot P(n+1). One of the P(1,2,...,n) is false.
April 02, 2018 at 09:16
You're free to believe whatever action is morally right but don't assume everyone agrees with you, or is grateful of your actions. I don't see the con...
April 02, 2018 at 07:50
It would still be a moral issue, although the conclusion would be different.
April 02, 2018 at 06:05
True, I'll rephrase that as "demanding justice for the sake of it". No, I base it on intended results, which in that example happened to be the same a...
April 01, 2018 at 08:12
The question can be rephrased as "for any given colour, do you believe it is that colour or not?". Whether the options are binary is not relevant, you...
March 31, 2018 at 16:54
What colour do you believe the shirt I am wearing right now is? No. They can't.
March 31, 2018 at 16:33
No. His work resulted in net gain. I would use neither of those definitions. I'd maybe define mercy as an act or decision of not punishing (even if th...
March 29, 2018 at 08:18
What's really the difference? How do they matter? Smith justifiedly believes in one outcome and the other one happens.
March 29, 2018 at 07:44
Nitpicking, the case is practically the same.
March 28, 2018 at 16:30
No, the reason for a is not specified in the example, although iirc, the example was given of the employer telling Smith that they're going to hire Jo...
March 27, 2018 at 22:39
In Gettier's original example, a person called Smith is applying for a job. Another person, Jones, whom is known to have 10 coins in his pocket, is ap...
March 27, 2018 at 22:03
Interesting. Can the same be said about anything that's alive? Body parts? The implication doesn't work the other way around.
March 27, 2018 at 21:55
We can't but in the absence of reasonable theories supporting one claim, the opposite can be called knowledge in practice imo.
March 27, 2018 at 20:13
Oh ffs not this again, it has been made clear what OP meant and that you're for some reason blatantly misinterpreting what has been said. So now you c...
March 27, 2018 at 20:10
I'm not sure whether you're saying that they do have consciousness or there was a misunderstanding, but I said "unless". Now if the former is the case...
March 27, 2018 at 20:07
Not correct, unless you claim bacteria,plants, individual cells have consciousness. You're just describing it by attributing the property of not being...
March 27, 2018 at 20:00
... according to your subjective opinion on the matter.
March 26, 2018 at 14:00
Because the only rational reason to demand for justice is the fear of being the one that is in the worse situation. If one wants altruistic good, they...
March 26, 2018 at 13:58
For that belief to exist one would have to exist to believe it. Similarly in Descartes' argument, it's not the cause of the thought that is relevant. ...
March 24, 2018 at 16:18
There's always a possibility of being wrong, so can you claim that your belief is justified if that claim isn't justified? Then you couldn't make that...
March 24, 2018 at 14:18
So we can never state that any belief is justified or reasonable because we can't be sure about hwhether they are true or not?
March 24, 2018 at 07:21
I'd say that depends on the situation, there are some specific cases of individual holding infallible knowledge. Generally speaking I see what you mea...
March 23, 2018 at 20:58
Not always: one can always know their own existence. Mathematics and logic can also be argued on. I also think the context matters, as some informatio...
March 23, 2018 at 20:10
Being reasonable isn't the same thing as having reasons. Earlier you agreed though that in the medieval times it was reasonable with the given evidenc...
March 23, 2018 at 18:20