You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Daemon

Comments

We've been slightly at cross purposes @"T Clark", no worries.
May 10, 2021 at 15:58
Ostensive definition From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia An ostensive definition conveys the meaning of a term by pointing out examples. This type o...
May 10, 2021 at 15:16
What does probabilistically (located) mean in this context?
May 10, 2021 at 14:44
Hi @"Possibility", Perhaps I should have said "affect" rather than "emotion". I was speaking quite loosely and I did put "emotion" in scare quotes. Wo...
May 10, 2021 at 11:38
Can you say why you don't buy the "hard problem" thing? In a new thread if you think that's best.
May 10, 2021 at 08:58
My definition of ostensive definition wasn't a non-standard definition of ostensive definition. HTH.
May 10, 2021 at 08:52
His take is that "emotion" is primary, and is located in the brain stem, a more "primitive" part of the brain. We've been looking in the wrong place. ...
May 10, 2021 at 08:50
No, there isn't a single correct definition, so it's a waste of time looking for that. I think you have to state your own working definition, in the s...
May 09, 2021 at 13:56
Thank you, I have enrolled.
May 09, 2021 at 13:44
I have been very struck by this recent video lecture by Mark Solms, who is both a neuroscientist and a psychiatrist: https://youtu.be/CmuYrnOVmfk He d...
May 09, 2021 at 13:09
I don't agree with you there Apollodorus. In the present context the way the word has been used for centuries is irrelevant. OP wants to know how we a...
May 09, 2021 at 12:53
I have a degree in Linguistics, and my teacher in the area of definitions was Professor Noel Ossleton, who was at that time President of the Internati...
May 09, 2021 at 12:11
Do you have a page reference please?
April 29, 2021 at 12:35
What exactly does Searle say about intentionality and background abilities?
April 29, 2021 at 11:37
I've found if you ask two Buddhists about Buddhism you get 3 contradictory answers,
April 26, 2021 at 16:25
"Abstract: Neuroscience investigates how neuronal processing circuits work, but it has problems explaining experiences this way." But "fields" doesn't...
April 24, 2021 at 20:00
Those who speak don't know. Those who know don't speak — Laozi He said that did he?
April 17, 2021 at 19:45
I did have in mind things that could never be seen, but not in the way your examples suggest. It would be better to say "could never be experienced " ...
January 02, 2021 at 11:15
Thanks for all the thoughtful posts, I've had a minor medical emergency, I will respond soon (I'm getting treatment).
December 26, 2020 at 22:23
Hi Coben, I'm working towards an understanding.
December 24, 2020 at 16:50
Has that happened yet?
December 23, 2020 at 11:42
I remember how I mashed my finger in a door when I was seven. I still have the scar. The memories are in my brain, nobody else's, the scar is on my fi...
December 23, 2020 at 10:27
How do you identify what is entering into relation with what? Those two asteroids are where they are because of Jupiter's gravitational effect, Jupite...
December 23, 2020 at 00:08
Thanks Andrew. Perhaps the words are being used in a technical sense but I feel there's something jarring about "ideal" and "transcends" here. Could w...
December 22, 2020 at 23:53
The local dialect where I come from, Tyneside, North East England, is certainly among the most extreme accents of British English, and we say "ya kna"...
December 22, 2020 at 18:18
Thank you. So do you think aspects can enter into relations with other aspects, let's say an asteroid hits another asteroid?
December 22, 2020 at 18:09
Where did you get that pronunciation from Olivier?
December 22, 2020 at 10:06
My interest was initially piqued by Andrew M's suggestion that we can see the world as it is, and his subsequent acknowledgement that colour-blind peo...
December 22, 2020 at 10:04
How did Austin deal with it?
December 22, 2020 at 00:20
There are also the unknown unknowns.
December 22, 2020 at 00:00
So if there aren't any creatures about, there isn't a way things are?
December 21, 2020 at 23:57
My thought was that we can tell from the robin and the tetrachromats that there are aspects of the world that are inaccessible to us.
December 21, 2020 at 23:47
Hi Banno, I was picking up Andrew M's suggestion about colour-blind people (see quote in my first post) and running with it. I don't have very clear v...
December 21, 2020 at 11:07
Hi Mww, I don't see why the mere arrival of the observer should change the way the world is in the way you suggest, so that it is now dependent on his...
December 19, 2020 at 22:27
I'm working off @Andrew M 's idea (or acceptance) that colour-blind people can't see the world as it is. Fish and birds can see into the ultra violet,...
December 19, 2020 at 18:28
You got a candidate something that we can see as it is?
December 19, 2020 at 18:00
I found it quite difficult to read beyond Chalmers' description of functional organisation and his announcement that he would defend it. It's absurdly...
December 19, 2020 at 00:39
Yes. But anyway it's not just patterns of behaviour?
December 18, 2020 at 23:25
I don't mind if you want to expound on that, but that wasn't what I was asking. I was trying to get clarity about whether you had said that a belief i...
December 18, 2020 at 22:09
I was under the impression you were saying a belief was a thing in your own mind. I asked if a belief was a thing in your own mind, or just a pattern ...
December 18, 2020 at 21:31
Don't want essays, just enough to go on. It seemed to me that you were saying that a belief was a thing in your own mind, which puzzled me.
December 18, 2020 at 21:17
You responded that it would have to be both. So I sought clarification: But you said that was very badly expressed. I'd just like to know what I got w...
December 18, 2020 at 20:57
I would like to know what you meant Banno.
December 18, 2020 at 18:07
Hi Andrew M, I'm seeking to apply the Principle of Charity But your response here seems like irremediable bollocks. Were you serious? Are you really s...
December 18, 2020 at 14:25
Is a colourblind person capable of seeing things as they are?
December 17, 2020 at 22:53
In case there's any doubt, I was straightforwardly asking Janus if he or she knew of a school of Ontological Pluralists. As for your question, surely ...
December 17, 2020 at 22:48
Do you know of any philosophers who espouse(d) OntPlu? I'm interested to know where that forms/constitutions terminology comes from. "Fundamental" is ...
December 17, 2020 at 22:27
I wasn’t really aware that Pluralism is a recognised school of thought. I’m not sure how I feel personally about ‘fundamental’ categories, so there’s ...
December 17, 2020 at 00:28
Does it matter whether we say that "physical" or not? "Everything is x" doesn't explain anything.
December 17, 2020 at 00:01
Or "pluralism"? There are lots of different kinds of things in the world. Not just two, not just one.
December 16, 2020 at 23:54