You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Antony Nickles

Comments

But this is different in that we have a known issue, a clear view of the interests, and are just debating what to do. And yes, we do need to also cond...
July 29, 2025 at 08:33
@"Number2018" @"NOS4A2" I knew this was going to get sticky. I am not arguing for activism as a means of persuasion, nor am I even arguing that activi...
July 29, 2025 at 07:38
Again, without having any actual knowledge of what “woke” is, couldn’t our current culture—our interests in the judgments we share, what matters, even...
July 29, 2025 at 07:10
@"Joshs" @"Leontiskos" @"Fire Ologist" @"Number2018" This is going to be tricky so grant me some leeway (if I haven’t asked enough for philosophers no...
July 29, 2025 at 05:10
@"Joshs" @"Number2018" A breath of fresh air to have actual political philosophy come up (even if peripherally). Mill, Emerson, and Rousseau (even Nie...
July 29, 2025 at 04:22
Another rejection is in limiting what counts as “rational” “argumentation”. Wittgenstein points out that there is not one standard but that each pract...
July 29, 2025 at 03:38
@"Number2018"@"Joshs"@"Leontiskos" Thus the importance, which I discussed above here and here, of our making the other’s claim as intelligible as poss...
July 28, 2025 at 22:31
What I meant was that an individual can make a moral claim that is legitimate, in the sense of intelligible, able to be defended, worthy of being take...
July 28, 2025 at 08:36
If we are going to call these both means of discourse, they are not competing, opposing methods, as if, for power, or at the expense of the other. The...
July 28, 2025 at 03:15
@"Joshs"@"Leontiskos"@"frank"@"Tom Storm" Obviously the criteria for judging the credibility of a witness can come off at first glance as…. vague, inc...
July 27, 2025 at 10:01
@"Joshs" @"Leontiskos" @"Tom Storm" @"frank" You may be wishing to qualify your argument with the above somehow (it’s not “emotion” but power), but a ...
July 27, 2025 at 02:38
Scrub
July 27, 2025 at 02:35
I realized that you actually have done some work in coming up with some theories about what is important in judging these claims (whatever they actual...
July 26, 2025 at 10:40
If I grant you there are real concerns about mere performance and whether a claim is an expression of a person’s actual interests (on top of social me...
July 26, 2025 at 00:05
But if we agree as to what moral discourse is, we can differentiate it from simply moralizing, which, as you say above to @"180 Proof", leads to self-...
July 25, 2025 at 08:00
Just philosophically speaking, we may be mixing a few things together. Presumably, we want to have a discussion about something on which we might all ...
July 24, 2025 at 18:08
@"J" @"Moliere" @"Hanover" Well, there’s a few maybe unexamined premises here. I take one to be that morality works based on predetermined standards t...
July 22, 2025 at 08:11
It’s not the view that we are to overcome, not the form of answer, but letting go of the desire for the outcome.
July 20, 2025 at 00:02
We appear to agree that the “local”/“absolute” framework needs to be set aside, I would say because it is merely a wish, a desire, a manufactured dich...
July 18, 2025 at 23:54
@"Banno" @"Wayfarer" @"Joshs" @"Fire Ologist" @"Leontiskos" Sure: knowing, understanding, thinking, seeing, being just, but they all have (specific) w...
July 17, 2025 at 08:19
Tank
July 17, 2025 at 08:16
@"Banno" @"Wayfarer" @"Leontiskos" This seems to be generalizing a sense there is relativism in any practice where the requirement for certainty (auth...
July 16, 2025 at 05:02
Flub
July 16, 2025 at 04:57
@"Banno" @"Wayfarer" Additional criteria would be completeness (encompassing all variables and outcomes); infallibility or predictability; being right...
July 14, 2025 at 22:06
I think we are pushing a few things together maybe. I took the “view from nowhere” as the requirement of a criteria of certainty (which I take Descart...
July 14, 2025 at 03:47
@"Banno" Without a full and exhaustive (-ing), discussion of what “knowledge” is, let’s assume we are all pretty much right that our desire for certai...
July 13, 2025 at 04:15
@"J" “We have agreed . . . that we would need some reasonable idea of what such a conception would be like, but we have not agreed that if we have tha...
July 13, 2025 at 01:11
The idea of “reality” was created by philosophy and is not what scientific practice produces, thus one reason why philosophy is “larger” than science ...
July 13, 2025 at 00:56
I am not arguing that we do not cooperate (even, fundamentally), nor even that this is a “fact” (biologically/socially universal; say, formative of ou...
July 10, 2025 at 07:39
Stepping in only having read your OP, I would agree that cooperation of a kind is necessary in a moral situation (not everything is a moral moment). I...
July 09, 2025 at 07:23
That would be the sense that “You can’t be serious!” (Not, denying the fact, but questioning my experience). But I could say, “You should have seen th...
June 14, 2025 at 23:10
@"J" @"I like sushi" Yeah I worded that poorly, making it sound like belief has no relation to the world, which of course is putting too much mustard ...
June 14, 2025 at 06:55
Turnt
June 14, 2025 at 06:55
@"Banno" @"I like sushi" @"J" Looking at the diagram of associated concepts made me think more on the assertion of a claim of knowledge compared to a ...
June 13, 2025 at 17:06
@"J" I’ve learned in this thread that belief does have more involved than I thought. Even though emotion seems to be an accompaniment (and not essenti...
June 13, 2025 at 07:43
Grk
June 13, 2025 at 07:42
@"Banno" I’ve been trying to argue that this “what we do” is our individual responsibility, and not anything like “what’s actually going on” that we c...
June 13, 2025 at 05:42
@"Banno" I of course acknowledge that we have that experience, even would call it a feeling, but, yes, it is not understanding (see PI #323 et seq “No...
June 12, 2025 at 21:24
I don’t like the word either. But maybe it is that we are disposed to fulfill the requirements (criteria) associated with what we believe (or claim to...
June 12, 2025 at 08:29
I’m not exactly clear what this is meant to distinguish; certainly there are distinct cases. I can front (lie, bluster… purport) that I understand wit...
June 12, 2025 at 06:53
@"Banno" Sure; only to say that what is important about understanding, how it matters to us, is not any process of the brain, as if an internal abilit...
June 12, 2025 at 00:39
Shank
June 12, 2025 at 00:38
@"Banno" @"Hanover" @"J" I think you’ve gotten at the crux of the matter. I suggest that a better term for this “feeling-about-something” is our “inte...
June 12, 2025 at 00:07
@"Banno" Well I would hope we can agree that, out of everything we do, not all of it we know why. And, even if we do consider something beforehand, as...
June 11, 2025 at 06:37
Granted; but the nomenclature is misleading (behind what?). The circumstances for a belief are in the world, at a time, and may define who I am. Also,...
June 11, 2025 at 03:24
All I meant was its nature is the desire to determine what is right ahead of time, so it has no use for how we mop up afterwards when the rules are no...
June 11, 2025 at 02:49
@"Banno" @"Hanover" There is no need for a background. I could say a fundamental part of who I am is my belief in Jesus, but that doesn’t mean there i...
June 11, 2025 at 02:13
Lurp
June 11, 2025 at 02:11
I would extract “disposition” farther away from anything like a sensation, emotion, or internal predilection. I would look at it as a circumstance (PI...
June 10, 2025 at 19:08
@"Banno" @"Hanover" As I said up here, the category of dispositions are not judged prior to an act, and so do not “affect” them, say, in a causal way....
June 10, 2025 at 04:40