You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

Allegedly for Narco-Terrorism Conspiracy, Cocaine Importation Conspiracy, Possession of Machineguns and Destructive Devices, and Conspiracy to Possess...
January 03, 2026 at 15:19
The most recent news article I can find is from a few weeks ago: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgmd132ge4o
January 03, 2026 at 15:12
The US attacked Venezuela and abducted their President, and Trump has repeatedly talked about wanting to annex Greenland, which is an autonomous terri...
January 03, 2026 at 15:00
Just a quibble but you're misusing the term "brute facts", at least as used by Anscombe and Searle. For Anscombe, a brute fact is a fact that cannot b...
January 01, 2026 at 15:11
Even if you don't mean to be racist a discussion like this is going to bring out the racists, and I'd rather not have to deal with that fallout. I won...
December 18, 2025 at 18:16
Proof of indirect realism and subjectivism and all that stuff obviously
December 18, 2025 at 14:43
Strange, for me the number under your name says 29.9k. /uploads/resized/files/ym/j1vlqiflnack5w2i.png
December 18, 2025 at 09:59
Well, the English language as it currently exists didn't exist in ancient times, so it's no surprise that many of the words we use today didn't exist ...
December 15, 2025 at 16:25
I haven't abandoned anything. I am explaining that you are misrepresenting your opponents' beliefs. These are different arguments: 1. a) only those wh...
December 11, 2025 at 10:47
It looks like your justification for (3) is this argument: P1. Those who say that trans women are women say that because of this trans women ought be ...
December 10, 2025 at 19:48
I don't quite understand what (3) means, but it doesn't seem to follow from (1). So even if (3) and (4) are false, it is still the case that (1) is tr...
December 10, 2025 at 19:16
(2) doesn't follow from (1)?
December 10, 2025 at 19:03
Sure, but the question is: should we continue with this historical separation, or ought our modern society introduce a new separation based instead on...
December 10, 2025 at 18:55
Yes, I alluded to this in that second post above. Given these terms: man1 = male sex man2 = male gender woman1 = female sex woman2 = female gender It ...
December 10, 2025 at 18:50
Well I certainly don't think that anyone who says "trans men are men" means to say "anyone who self-identifies as a man has XY chromosomes and a penis...
December 10, 2025 at 18:41
Carrying on from the above, it's worth pointing out that those in favour of trans rights are also often guilty of equivocation. Take the following cla...
December 10, 2025 at 18:37
The claim is that there is a distinction between sex and gender and that the English words "man" and "woman" are polysemic, referring either to sex or...
December 10, 2025 at 18:07
Here are two different claims: 1. Trans men are men 2. Under this Act, it is illegal to refuse entry to men The phrase "are men" in (1) is unambiguous...
December 09, 2025 at 19:12
You are misunderstanding me again. I'll try to be even clearer: P1. Michael says "trans men are men". C1. Therefore, Michael is saying (and believes) ...
December 09, 2025 at 18:46
With respect to "male" and "female" brains, the notion is that most biological men have a broadly similar brain structure, that most biological women ...
December 09, 2025 at 18:20
Is this your reasoning? P1. Men are humans with XY chromosomes, testes, a penis, etc. P2. Women are humans with XX chromosomes, ovaries, a vagina, etc...
December 09, 2025 at 17:43
If a phrase could possibly mean one of two things, but one of those things is utterly absurd, then unless you believe that the person who said it is s...
December 09, 2025 at 17:01
That's not what I've said. What I've said is that if I say "trans men are men" and you think to yourself "Michael believes that humans with XX chromos...
December 09, 2025 at 16:42
I suspect that for all phrases there is at least one person who has used a different interpretation to what is ordinary, but that doesn't mean that al...
December 09, 2025 at 16:29
So let's take an incredibly reductive approach and say that a biological man is a human with a penis and a biological woman is a human with a vagina. ...
December 09, 2025 at 16:09
The first three studies in a Google search disagree. Brain Sex in Transgender Women Is Shifted towards Gender Identity Transgender individuals (TIs) s...
December 09, 2025 at 16:00
It's really not. No person who says "trans men are men" is saying "biological women who identify as men are biological men". That the sentence starts ...
December 09, 2025 at 15:01
I don't understand the point of your question, but to explain why NotAristotle is wrong, let's consider all possible permutations of two coin tosses a...
December 04, 2025 at 21:25
In: Bannings  — view comment
That’s a terrible analogy. A more appropriate one is the gambling addict who asks to be banned from a casino.
December 04, 2025 at 18:23
No, that’s the gambler’s fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy
December 04, 2025 at 17:52
In: Bannings  — view comment
Proof that he's an adult or proof that he told us that he wants to be banned? This is the proof that he told us that he wants to be banned, from the d...
December 03, 2025 at 20:12
In: Bannings  — view comment
He's an adult who told us what he wanted. I'm not going to infantilise him.
December 03, 2025 at 19:09
In: Bannings  — view comment
Banned @"ProtagoranSocratist" because he asked us to: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/16297/i-dont-think-the-site-overall-is-very-well-desig...
December 03, 2025 at 18:21
As a programmer this is the only feature of Cursor that I use. I've never once asked it to generate code for me. I'm stubbornly old-fashioned.
December 03, 2025 at 17:27
I get the extra fiery version from time to time. Gotta love a good burn.
December 03, 2025 at 16:44
It's not idiotic to believe that the word "men" only means "biological men". But if a very large number of people say things like "trans men are men" ...
December 01, 2025 at 20:32
Yes, some people aren't fluent in English or might not understand the distinction between sex and gender, but Philosophim isn't one of those people. H...
December 01, 2025 at 18:47
The sentence "trans men are men" isn't ambiguous, just as the sentences "bats are flying mammals" and "bats are used in baseball" are not ambiguous. A...
December 01, 2025 at 18:06
It’s very simple. Nobody who says “trans men are men” believes that biological women who identify as men are biological men. It’s absurd that this nee...
November 30, 2025 at 15:05
It’s common sense that there is no widespread mass psychosis about the sex organs of transgender people. This is most obvious given that these people ...
November 30, 2025 at 14:40
That some people suffer from psychosis does not justify your position. Common sense is sufficient to understand that most people aren’t suffering from...
November 30, 2025 at 13:41
Again, if you interpret the phrase “trans men are men” as “trans men are biologically male” then that’s on you. Do you honestly believe that people wh...
November 30, 2025 at 13:22
I think that if you interpret the phrase “trans men are men” as “trans men are biologically male” then that’s on you. Given that the sentence starts w...
November 30, 2025 at 12:58
I don’t think it’s anything so complicated. It’s just people thinking that words have some singular meaning. The English words “man” and “woman” can r...
November 30, 2025 at 12:19
A 3-sided die is rolled. If it rolls a 1 then she is woken once on Tuesday. If it rolls a 2 then she is woken once on Monday. If it rolls a 3 then she...
November 28, 2025 at 10:13
These are clearly different experiments: 1. If a D3 rolls a 1 then she is woken once on Tuesday, else she is woken once on Monday. 2. If a D2100 rolls...
November 28, 2025 at 09:25
I don't know if it's quite comparable but it reminds me of the Boltzmann brain paradox. Although the probability of a Boltzmann brain forming is vanis...
November 27, 2025 at 21:24
Which is true. But I believe the step from this to "therefore, my credence that this is a 1-awakening is 2\over3" is a non sequitur. This extreme exam...
November 27, 2025 at 21:12
So then what is this calculation using pounds and pence? I disagree that there's any ambiguity. This is an "n-sided die rolled a 1" awakening if and o...
November 27, 2025 at 20:19
So you're willing to commit to the conclusion that Sleeping Beauty's credence that the 2100-sided die rolled a 1 is \approx {2\over3}, i.e. she should...
November 27, 2025 at 19:57