You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

These are your exact words: If this is our experiment: 1. We roll a 2100-sided die 2. Sleeping Beauty is woken up over 2101 days if it rolls a 1 3. Sl...
November 27, 2025 at 19:50
It is a fact that if this is our experiment 1. We roll a 2100-sided die 2. Sleeping Beauty is woken up over 2101 days if it rolls a 1 3. Sleeping Beau...
November 27, 2025 at 17:33
I'm not. I'm saying that if this is our experiment: 1. We roll a 2100-sided die 2. Sleeping Beauty is woken up over 2101 days if it rolls a 1 3. Sleep...
November 27, 2025 at 16:43
One of the things I really like about PlushForums is that when I click on a discussion it takes me to the last comment I viewed, and not just the firs...
November 27, 2025 at 15:35
These were your exact words: This can be generalised as: Her credence when asked is {a}\over{b}, because of the i possible cells in the n \times m arr...
November 27, 2025 at 15:18
It's wrong because the expected returns aren't £33.333... if betting on heads or £66.666... if betting on tails. So then can you set out your calculat...
November 27, 2025 at 14:49
The Online Safety Act applies to all websites that are accessible in the UK, regardless of where the owners live/are incorporated or where the website...
November 26, 2025 at 19:38
I really don't understand what point you're trying to argue. The facts are that (a) if we are to continue to provide access to UK residents then we mu...
November 26, 2025 at 19:17
I think you have a misunderstanding of the Online Safety Act. If we don't comply then the Office of Communications (Ofcom) can fine us (up to £18 mill...
November 26, 2025 at 19:05
It wasn't a typo. Given a 2100-sided die there are 2100 rows, and given that there are 2101 days there are 2101 columns. That gives us a 2100 × 2101 m...
November 26, 2025 at 18:07
He was banned — probably for low post quality — but then he created a new account, so we banned him again, but then he created a new account, so we ba...
November 25, 2025 at 22:30
Are you asking about Marco? He's an annoying fucking twat, as elucidated with exceptional eloquence here. Suffice it to say he's the reason this forum...
November 25, 2025 at 22:10
Before https://thephilosophyforum.com there was another forum. The owner of the old forum sold it to a man named Eric Porat. Some of us had concerns a...
November 25, 2025 at 21:53
See here for an unbiased account of Marco.
November 25, 2025 at 21:36
@"Jamal" If Marco comes back I may have to burn the place to the ground.
November 25, 2025 at 21:27
As above, replace the coin with a 2100-sided die. If it lands on a 1 then you are woken up on 2101 days otherwise you are only woken up on one day. Af...
November 25, 2025 at 19:58
It's a false analogy because "not being woken up" is nothing like "playing football". It's a mistake to consider "Heads + Tuesday" at all. We can simp...
November 25, 2025 at 19:41
If she is interviewed before playing football her credence that the coin landed on tails is not 1, but if she is interviewed after playing football he...
November 25, 2025 at 17:33
If Monday is tennis and Tuesday is football then waking up and playing either tennis or football is new information that allows you to rule out one po...
November 24, 2025 at 18:47
This is such a nonsense claim.
November 21, 2025 at 17:15
I assume this means that the new site will use a new URL for a time? Because if the new site immediately uses https://thephilosophyforum.com then nobo...
November 21, 2025 at 12:02
In both cases one's credence in the outcome of the coin toss is 1\over2. We use this credence, in conjunction with the payout structure, to determine ...
November 17, 2025 at 20:19
I don't understand what you're saying here. Someone is wrong if they claim that God exists but they're not wrong if they claim that the word "God" mea...
October 17, 2025 at 14:45
Yes, I have tried to argue this point several times. A rational person's credence in the outcome of the coin toss is unrelated to the betting strategy...
October 17, 2025 at 11:05
What you literally said, and what I am replying to, was "the terms man and woman indicate a person's age and sex, not gender" and this is factually in...
October 17, 2025 at 10:55
I'm saying that words can have more than one meaning, and that one of the meanings of the word "man" is "someone whose gender is male". I'm not sure w...
October 17, 2025 at 10:45
To paraphrase Captain Barbossa, they're more what you'd call guidelines than actual rules. And, once again, natural languages just aren't the perfectl...
October 15, 2025 at 20:33
It's foolish to argue that words should or shouldn't mean something, or to deny the empirical fact that they are used to mean certain things. Well, th...
October 15, 2025 at 20:04
Not everyone uses the word "slay" to mean "impressive" (or whatever it means to youths these days), but that is nonetheless one of its meanings. If yo...
October 15, 2025 at 19:36
Again, there's not much sense in this so-called "pragmatically relevant" credence. Even before being put to sleep – and even before the die is rolled ...
October 15, 2025 at 19:13
I answered your question. Your opening post shows that you understand the distinction between sex and gender, given that you use the phrases "female w...
October 11, 2025 at 17:48
It doesn’t have just one meaning. It can refer to sex or it can refer to gender. This isn’t to say that it is equally likely to refer to gender as sex...
October 11, 2025 at 16:31
It's an umbrella term that includes cis men and trans men. A cis man is someone whose sex is male and gender is male. A trans man is someone whose sex...
October 11, 2025 at 16:24
No, I didn't. I said that the word "man" is used to refer to cis men and used to refer to trans men.
October 11, 2025 at 16:17
I didn't say that.
October 11, 2025 at 16:11
It doesn't increase her odds but it does increase her expected return in the long run. On this point it's worth considering an extreme example I provi...
October 11, 2025 at 16:06
It doesn't ignore it. I am simply explaining the empirical fact that your definition is inconsistent with how English speakers actually use the words....
October 11, 2025 at 15:50
No natural language is clear, unambiguous, and logical. Certainly not English. Maybe check out Loglan if that's your interest. There's nothing about l...
October 11, 2025 at 15:40
A word's meaning is determined by how its users use it. If a sufficient number of English speakers use the word "man" to refer to both trans men and c...
October 11, 2025 at 15:32
Words can mean more than one thing. The word "man" can also mean "human", and as a verb it refers to a certain kind of behaviour, e.g. in the phrase "...
October 11, 2025 at 15:19
You appear to be affirming the consequent. In this case, Tails is noticed twice as often because Tails is twice as likely to be noticed. It doesn't th...
October 11, 2025 at 14:54
Apologies for doing this as a second post. I did mean to include this earlier but miss-clicked. I think your comment sidestepped the issue I was raisi...
October 07, 2025 at 20:04
This, I think, shows the fallacy. You're equivocating, or at least begging the question. It's not that there is an increased proclivity to awaken in t...
October 07, 2025 at 18:59
The multiple bets structure is the misleading structure, and where one is betting on the least likely outcome. If you are offered the opportunity to p...
October 07, 2025 at 09:14
You seem to continue to conflate an outcome's expected return with its probability and assert that one's behaviour is only governed by one's credence ...
October 06, 2025 at 21:26
This is where I believe the mistake is made. The question she is asked after being woken up is the same question she is asked before being put to slee...
October 06, 2025 at 19:35
This makes no sense. There is only one kind of event; being woken up after a die roll. Her credence in the outcome of that die roll cannot be and is n...
October 06, 2025 at 17:01
It's not an arbitrary payout structure. A £100 reward is paid out at 6:00pm for any correct bet on the outcome of a die roll. Sleeping Beauty and Prin...
October 06, 2025 at 07:53
Correct. Her reasoning would be: A1. If I keep my bet and the die didn't land on a 6 then I will win £100 A2. If I change my bet and the die did land ...
October 05, 2025 at 23:21
That doesn't follow. It depends on the manner in which the door is chosen. Compare with a red bag containing 100 balls and a blue bag containing 50 ba...
October 05, 2025 at 22:56