No, you're misunderstanding the definition. The article is even clearer in its opening paragraph: "The object is something that presumably exists inde...
I'm not being intellectually dishonest. I'm staying on topic. The definition of "objective thing" as given by the IEP is that of a thing that exists e...
"It exists when we're not aware of it" and "it exists as it is independent of any conscious awareness of it" mean the same thing. Therefore if it does...
It the thing pops out of existence when it isn't seen then it doesn't "exist as it is independent of any conscious awareness of it (via perception, th...
You're being ambiguous here. When you say "it disappears" are you just saying "it disappears from sight" or are you saying "it ceases to exist"? The f...
What? It's exactly the same thing. If a thing exists independently of any conscious awareness of it (via perception, thought, etc.) then it continues ...
It says exactly that. Objective things are things that exist independent of any conscious awareness of them (via perception, thought, etc.). And to sa...
I highly doubt that intrapersona is claiming that " is only ever an inference at best". Rather it seems that he's saying " is only ever an inference a...
What's the "etc."? An opposition to same sex marriage? An opposition to the theory of evolution (as given here)? Promoting Christian values? Promoting...
In the ordinary sense, i.e. the only sense that matters when making such a claim. The truth of the claim has nothing to do with what the Earth is doin...
But I believe it's the one that @"intrapersona" makes, and so (again) you're not addressing his claim; which is that that things continue to exist eve...
How do you observe that your Kindle is an objective thing (where an objective thing is a thing that exists even when it's not being observed)? You'd h...
No, I wouldn't. I don't see why you would think the movement of the Earth relevant. Do you not say of the statue "it's not moving"? I'm sure you do. I...
I wouldn't say that's a metaphor either. Because the movement of the Earth in space is irrelevant to the meaning (and so truth) of the statement. Cont...
It's not a metaphor. Just as it's not a metaphor when I (correctly) say "I'm not moving" while standing still, despite the fact that I'm hurtling thro...
This betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of language. You might as well take issue with the phrase "it's pissing it down" because nobody is urinati...
I haven't watched any of the debates, but from what I've read it seems that all they do is insult one another. Aren't they supposed to be explaining t...
I don't see why we need objective things to exist for the word "objective" to mean what it does (and so for the word "subjective" to mean what it does...
I don't see why this means that the sun doesn't rise. If I say that you're sitting to the left of someone else, is what I say false because, from some...
That's not how he justifies his claim. He starts with the fact that he's doubting and then argues that because doubt requires thought, he thinks. And ...
Descartes said "I think, therefore I am", not "I am, therefore I think", so this claim seems misplaced. You don't need to know how awareness emerges f...
The problem with the private sector is that it's up to the landlords to determine the rent and whether or not to accept people on benefits, and given ...
Yeah, outside of classes I didn't do much work but still managed a 2:1. Maybe my course was easy or maybe I'm just naturally suited to the subject. Or...
The exams were like the essays. I didn't do any formal logic. It was just questions on some notable philosopher or theory. Summarise the views, expoun...
Pretty much that, although there were also end-of-term exams, and a couple of the essays in the first year were only 1,500 words if I recall. I had be...
I don't know who defined it that way, but it's how the view is defined on the Wikipedia and the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy pages. And it cert...
Presumably that things have a red appearance even when not being seen. The traditional naive view is that things have a look even if they're not being...
I understand "visible" to mean "capable of being seen", as I said. I don't know what you mean by it, and simply saying "it's visible but you can't see...
The epistemological idealist and anti-realist will accept that account of being red even when not being seen. But that's not the naive realist view. T...
Comments