You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

They're not. Whether you want to say "all statements are false" is false or "all statements are false" is neither true nor false, it is still the case...
October 07, 2017 at 10:51
It's alright. I have at least 500 with a score of 10, so the other 3,500 don't need to be good.
October 06, 2017 at 13:32
Let's say that a perfect score is 10 and that every one of your posts is perfect. Your quantity × quality score is 5,000. My posts would only need to ...
October 06, 2017 at 13:29
Again, Kant disagreed. From the The Critique of Practical Reason: You're interpreting Kant's words according to your own views on morality and freedom...
October 06, 2017 at 11:49
This is debatable. Some (e.g. non-cognitivists) would understand the sentence "You should love everyone" as the command "love everyone". Commands aren...
October 06, 2017 at 11:37
You're saying that one is only obligated to obey the categorical imperative if one has free will (in a weak sense, where ordinary coercion negates fre...
October 06, 2017 at 11:00
And that work entailed the duty to not lie to the murderer, as Constant recognised, hence his objection. Your suggested "out" seems to be a misunderst...
October 06, 2017 at 10:57
Given that Kant disagreed, I'm confident in claiming that you're wrong.
October 06, 2017 at 10:52
In fact, he even says "What else then can freedom of the will be but autonomy, that is the property of the will to be a law to itself? But the proposi...
October 06, 2017 at 10:52
That's just him arguing that we have free will. It doesn't provide him with an excuse to lie to the murderer.
October 06, 2017 at 10:45
It was entailed by his earlier work, which is why Constant brought it up. This later article didn't change his system; it reaffirmed it in light of th...
October 06, 2017 at 10:31
Kant disagrees:
October 06, 2017 at 10:05
You can still search for members. Just can't read any posts. Actually, you can search for posts too. You just can't click through to read the whole di...
October 06, 2017 at 08:46
Alright, I'll add the 12,382 from the old site, giving me 16,566. You had 3,236 at the old site, giving you 10,533. Tiff has the most with 17,682 + 99...
October 06, 2017 at 08:36
This is my 4,183rd.
October 06, 2017 at 08:02
The rest of my post. The part(s) you didn't respond to.
October 06, 2017 at 06:34
I have training in defending against knife attacks. I don't have training in dodging bullets. I think any sane person would rather a would-be attacker...
October 05, 2017 at 22:36
On its own it wouldn't do anything (as I've said previously). But it would give the federal and state governments greater freedom to put in place stri...
October 05, 2017 at 22:10
I proposed an idea: repeal the second amendment.
October 05, 2017 at 21:21
And you're still wrong. According to Kant, one's duty doesn't depend on others being dutiful. It is wrong for me to lie even if others lie. It is wron...
October 05, 2017 at 17:35
The second premise is false when we include the term "imaginable". Am I stronger than Superman because I exist, or is he stronger than me because he's...
October 05, 2017 at 16:28
Your "solution" is wrong. Kant specifically says that one is duty-bound to lie to a would-be murderer. So you can either accept this as a reductio ad ...
October 05, 2017 at 16:24
The first part of Person B's claim is actually Person A's claim: Person A: I don't think more gun control would have stopped the recent mass shooting....
October 05, 2017 at 15:09
Nirvana fallacy Although looking at it now, the related perfect solution fallacy is the better term: "an argument assumes that a perfect solution exis...
October 05, 2017 at 14:14
Then I must be dense, because I don't see it. Not only do I fail to see how current advertising affects your rights, I also fail to see how a change i...
October 05, 2017 at 14:05
Which seems to me to be a type of nirvana fallacy. Someone who would commit murder were they to have a gun. If we took their gun away, would they find...
October 05, 2017 at 13:53
I'm not exactly sure what the content of advertising has to do with your rights.
October 05, 2017 at 13:30
And that people want to molest children will not be nipped in the bud by not letting them work in schools. They'll find other places. But it's still a...
October 05, 2017 at 13:22
Do you have a study to back this up? According to this, regarding the International Sexuality Description Project, led by David P. Schmitt, PhD, which...
October 05, 2017 at 12:50
The Philosophy Forum - this may all be pointless OK, that's our tag line.
October 05, 2017 at 11:49
I wasn't actually arguing that this reasoning is correct. I'm only arguing that my reasoning is the same as Hanover's. My ulterior motive is to have H...
October 05, 2017 at 11:43
I've given it. In Hanover's case the set is The Philosophy Forum and in my case the set is Michael. The former set isn't numerous enough to make a dif...
October 05, 2017 at 11:37
There is no disconnect. We're both saying that if a particular set (a set that may include just one member) is too small to make a difference then the...
October 05, 2017 at 11:35
This makes no sense. You might as well respond to Hanover's comment with "but if those of you in America fight for gun control than you can make a dif...
October 05, 2017 at 11:27
You seem to have missed the point. Hanover is saying that the members of this forum bear no responsibility (for gun deaths) because our advocacy is in...
October 05, 2017 at 11:18
I'll try to make it clearer. 1. God is defined as the greatest being imaginable 2. The greatest being imaginable is imagined to have the properties of...
October 05, 2017 at 11:14
Huh? I'm saying I don't vote because my vote wouldn't make a difference. What are you saying?
October 05, 2017 at 11:04
My vote wouldn't make a difference (well, almost always; in 1910 the Conservatives won the Exeter constituency by 1 vote).
October 05, 2017 at 10:59
That's why I don't vote.
October 05, 2017 at 10:50
I agree. Obviously the military and the police force's armed response units can have guns.
October 05, 2017 at 10:09
Golden. :D
October 05, 2017 at 10:07
Omnipotent, omnibenevolent, omniscient, and sexy. That, of course, proves that God must be a woman. As I said before, this term "greater" is so unclea...
October 05, 2017 at 10:02
I believe the rationale is that it's in the child's best interests, and the child's best interests are more important than the interests of the parent...
October 05, 2017 at 08:05
Did you know that "wosret" is an ancient Sumerian antonym of "stoic"?
October 04, 2017 at 20:06
Thanks. I put a lot of work into it. The focus group was very positive.
October 04, 2017 at 19:25
What I was trying to explain is that "people will find other ways" isn't a good defence against a ban.
October 04, 2017 at 19:10
The point I'm making is that "people will find other ways" isn't a good defence against a ban. We need to talk about Kevin Wosret.
October 04, 2017 at 18:17
Here's a nice extreme example: Child molesters will likely find a way to molest children even if we ban them from working in schools. Therefore, there...
October 04, 2017 at 18:00
I don't even know what you mean by blind trust, nor why such a thing is required to forgo the right to bear arms. If you're really concerned about the...
October 04, 2017 at 15:56
We're saying that the second amendment should be repealed so that better gun control laws can be put in place. So this response makes no sense in cont...
October 04, 2017 at 15:48