You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

gurugeorge

Comments

It's sort of roughly contemporaneous with ancient Greek materialism (Leucippus was 5th century, and there are hints that Greek atomism may go back eve...
December 12, 2017 at 14:03
Personally, while I see the attraction of Theism (it neatly brings closure to rationality), I stick to agnostic rationalism. We just don't know enough...
December 12, 2017 at 13:53
Depends on what grain and standard you're using. If you're going down to the level of neuroscience, the actual "scanning" part of our sensory equipmen...
December 12, 2017 at 13:45
Hehe, I'm not being obtuse, I assure you. I used to be captivated by all this stuff myself, so I understand its attraction. A computer. Why would I de...
December 12, 2017 at 13:25
No, I proposed such a test in post 131625, and you even quoted it yourself en passant in a later post: "You can easily verify the existence of unperce...
December 11, 2017 at 17:39
I already told you: do something like take a picture while you have your eyes closed, and you will be able to verify that the object of your experienc...
December 10, 2017 at 22:25
I mean they're inaccessible to us in terms of being a shareable raw basis on which to build shared meaning. Obviously once we have shared meaning comi...
December 09, 2017 at 21:26
I didn't ignore it, I said that it's a flight of fancy you've given me no reason to take seriously. It's just a different definition of "doubt" from t...
December 09, 2017 at 14:09
Yeah but the similarities (as well as the differences) are inaccessible to us, all we have that we can share is the shared patterns of symbol use. IOW...
December 09, 2017 at 13:46
Yes, I think that's right. Early philosophers would have been (rightly) baffled by Cartesian scepticism.
December 09, 2017 at 02:26
Doubt is not suspension of judgement, it's the questioning of the truth or validity of something based on reasons (e.g. some anomaly). Suspension of j...
December 09, 2017 at 02:19
Slavery has always had its detractors, and even at worst, most societies that have had slaves have had rules about not mistreating them. It would be a...
December 09, 2017 at 01:47
I don't think the Wittgensteinian angle Banno's flying the flag for would deny this, in fact Wittgenstein's way of looking at things almost relies on ...
December 09, 2017 at 01:18
Any "why believe that?" question can be answered normally. Why believe there's a table in front of you? Because you can see it, it's got the functiona...
December 08, 2017 at 23:52
Yeah, exactly. Global scepticism is a dead end in thought. It looks tempting, and it's instructive to poke around, but ultimately it just doesn't make...
December 08, 2017 at 23:09
"Grounded in" isn't at all the same thing as "determined by." I'm not sure if I can explain my position any better than I already did in that last pos...
December 08, 2017 at 23:05
The problem with scepticism is that doubt only makes sense if it's limited, because doubt about one thing requires a reason to doubt, which presuppose...
December 08, 2017 at 19:05
There's nothing wrong with sharing your ideas with others, or recommending things to them, however bizarre, I think the line to cross would be if you ...
December 08, 2017 at 18:41
Moral codes aren't actually all that different depending on where you are. There are certainly some differences, and occasionally bizarre differences,...
December 08, 2017 at 16:37
Children aren't more informed, they have access to more information, those are different things. Children still don't have the nous that comes from ex...
December 08, 2017 at 16:30
Yeah, the question though is whether we ought to allow ourselves to be driven by anything that's not rationally verifiable, whether we should allow ou...
December 08, 2017 at 16:25
No it's not biological determinism, it's that human nature is like a tether - you have a fair bit room to wander over possible-social-rule space, some...
December 08, 2017 at 16:21
The problem is that you have a God-shaped hole :) To unpack that: we are born with "why"-asking machinery in our brains, and that machinery, which nor...
December 06, 2017 at 14:16
That would presuppose a standard for "good" that's outside what's good for humans. But that would only be a standard chosen by some humans (e.g. natur...
December 06, 2017 at 13:50
I don't think there are any moral changes, what happens is that the relatively stable features of human nature and the world are always juxtaposed aga...
December 06, 2017 at 13:33
If something doesn't have any effect on perception, then it makes no difference to us human beings whether it exists or not; there can be no evidence ...
December 06, 2017 at 13:24
I think ethics does presuppose a human nature, and also a nature-of-the-world. It presupposes that things and people have innate tendencies, innate pa...
December 04, 2017 at 08:17
Generally speaking, I think non-physical things that are real are mostly patterns, relatively stable patterns of behaviour, of interaction, etc., of p...
December 04, 2017 at 08:10
There are two aspects to this, the first is the two world wars and their respective aftermaths, the second is the more purely academic cults of Critic...
December 04, 2017 at 08:07
Strictly speaking, "designed" is really just a shorthand for the evolutionary explanation for the existence of organisms. Nothing is actually designed...
December 04, 2017 at 07:58
The general etymology seems to be related to "faith, faithfulness, fidelity, loyalty; veracity, quality of being true; pledge, covenant," from Germani...
May 15, 2017 at 19:20
I think we can cut through a whole lot of bullshit about belief and truth by looking at the etymology of "true". It has to do with trust. Belief is a ...
May 12, 2017 at 17:31
Yeah, I think this is one of the few settled things we can say in all this area. Things like Idealism and phenomenalism are actually incoherent, since...
May 12, 2017 at 17:12