You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Srap Tasmaner

Comments

What about the person who just knows they have the winning ticket? Have you ever seen the game show "Deal or No Deal?" Fascinating exercise in probabi...
March 29, 2018 at 15:30
Wait -- does it? I think in this case, it's that the inference that would preserve justification is faulty. (You just can't go from "each individually...
March 28, 2018 at 18:47
Right, I had forgotten about this. My hot take is still that this is a muddle that arises from ambiguity over what constitutes a trial. The closure pr...
March 28, 2018 at 16:24
Hmmmm. 1. Is there a hidden premise here that some ticket will win? Because the way the big lotteries work here in the States, it's quite common for n...
March 28, 2018 at 15:38
In: Belief  — view comment
No it isn't.
March 26, 2018 at 22:47
In: Belief  — view comment
"Trust that ..." sounds pretty close to "expectation that ..." I think this is all to the good, Javra. Fits comfortably with my ridiculous chair that ...
March 26, 2018 at 15:46
What about just the premise? Is it possible (whatever you mean by "possible") for me to believe that your claim is reasonable but wrong?
March 26, 2018 at 15:40
In: Belief  — view comment
I'm deeply sympathetic to this view, Banno. I'm not sure though that I'd want to say beliefs are not real, or that concepts aren't real. They're just ...
March 26, 2018 at 05:43
Just the usual. I think Gettier actually talks about "entailment" but it's not clear whether he means something special by that. We can come back to t...
March 26, 2018 at 03:09
He doesn't argue for this position; he asks us to accept it as a premise. You don't. The word "justified" is really not particularly important here --...
March 25, 2018 at 16:36
Hmmm. Here's another way to look at the issue. The word "reason" is ambiguous in an interesting way: we reason from our knowledge of effects to their ...
March 24, 2018 at 14:37
"She looks twenty," is indeed a reason to believe she's of the age of consent, but maybe not a very good reason.
March 24, 2018 at 03:21
It's a soundness/validity kind of thing. Reasons that actually support the conclusion, if imperfectly, are what we want, not just any old stuff. We di...
March 24, 2018 at 03:13
Honored to be on that list, but we both know I learned more from you than you did from me.
March 05, 2018 at 19:15
I hoist a flag that means "three-masted ship". You see the flag and write down "three-masted ship". Because i can convey the idea of a three-masted sh...
October 28, 2017 at 20:27
There's all this "grasping" in your approach, as if this explains things. Grasping is what you do to an object. I'm saying there's no immaterial objec...
October 26, 2017 at 23:42
If I ask you to draw a house, I'm asking you to draw a picture of a house. (Only Harold can draw an actual house.) If you draw a triangle, are you act...
October 26, 2017 at 23:14
Got it. I believe I am following you, and sometime tomorrow I will move on to thinking about it.
October 24, 2017 at 07:42
Why would I dismiss semantics? What does that even mean? I think it's safe to say you have misunderstood. Maybe this would we a good point for us to t...
October 24, 2017 at 06:29
Are you even reading my posts?
October 24, 2017 at 05:48
I think it does. I think the shadow means hawk to them in the same way it would mean hawk to us, and that the sense (!) in which the word "hawk" means...
October 24, 2017 at 05:23
https://youtu.be/rGA8z3ycKcE
October 24, 2017 at 03:38
I will speak unguardedly for a moment: Semantics seems to be the big mystery. How do we symbolize? How can something mean something? And there's a vie...
October 24, 2017 at 02:11
I wasn't just talking about communication. Animals of all sorts clearly respond to types of things. You don't flee a predator because it's Shere Kahn,...
October 23, 2017 at 23:30
Bees like certain types of flowers, not particular individual flowers. Vervet monkeys make a certain type of a call when they spot a certain type of p...
October 23, 2017 at 22:22
I think the first quote there makes it difficult for some of us to understand what approach is suggested by the second quote. You seem to rule out exa...
October 23, 2017 at 20:13
As a matter of logic, sure, but this is not really in the spirit of the enterprise, is it? We want to avoid claims that could only be falsified by obs...
October 23, 2017 at 11:10
"Some mammals lay eggs" might count as an observation rather than a theory. It would be an observation that falsifies the universal claim "No mammals ...
October 23, 2017 at 10:36
I'd now say what I was groping for was just a market rather than an auction, which in retrospect is obvious. I can see a case for all sorts of things,...
October 20, 2017 at 22:41
My old favorite: A man posts a vague and somewhat mysterious advertisement for a job opening. Three applicants show up for interviews: a mathematician...
October 20, 2017 at 15:49
Thanks for the reference to color constancy. Don't know if I had ever seen this stuff before and it is way cool.
October 18, 2017 at 19:42
Then you know this one: What were the redneck's last words?
October 18, 2017 at 17:49
It's relative, not absolute purpose. For a phenotypic variation to be differentially replicated,* it must provide some survival or reproductive advant...
October 18, 2017 at 17:30
Here's another way to characterize the competition among theories that makes more sense in some ways: Competing theories offer for sale comparable pro...
October 18, 2017 at 16:36
I got halfway through it. It's ignorant horse hockey.
October 18, 2017 at 03:18
Ockham's razor is about competition among theories. One form such competition might take is an auction, and it occurred to me that philosophers do som...
October 18, 2017 at 03:06
It was meant as a gesture toward what a theory of concepts might look like. Suppose instead of some ideal abstract triangle, you had instead a rule ab...
October 18, 2017 at 02:56
Those phenomena, and those cognitive capacities-- it's all about information. It was fun, Wayfarer! Let's do this again sometime.
October 18, 2017 at 02:32
? The way an object absorbs or reflects light is determined by its structure and composition, no mind needed. When that tree falls in that forest, a w...
October 17, 2017 at 22:57
But there is a structure-preserving map from the actors on set to the digitally encoded signal that is transmitted to my TV. That signal carries infor...
October 17, 2017 at 21:00
Lots of other thoughts about my little model, so here's one more. How is payment made? By committing to uphold what you bid. Suppose "having explained...
October 17, 2017 at 05:01
That is just about the nicest thing you could say to me.
October 17, 2017 at 03:30
I think I understand what your overall position is, and the specific claim you're advancing in this specific thread, and I know in a vague way they go...
October 17, 2017 at 03:14
No.
October 17, 2017 at 02:52
So was your answer that once hominins are language users, from then on information is not physical for them? Was it physical before? Or did they just ...
October 17, 2017 at 01:10
Yeah, sorry. Should've been clearer.
October 17, 2017 at 00:11
Sorry. Trying to address you and Wayfarer simultaneously, and that's bound to be confusing! Instead of responding directly to your last post about com...
October 17, 2017 at 00:10
That question wasn't for you.
October 16, 2017 at 23:52
I hope you don't think I was claiming there's no difference between animal signaling and human language. The question is whether language has a monopo...
October 16, 2017 at 23:45
You are of course free to bid 0, but there's a chance your bid will not be taken seriously.
October 16, 2017 at 23:32