You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Kenosha Kid

Comments

P.S. I happened across this entire book on arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02738 You would have thought that a book on the ontology of the wavefunct...
October 14, 2020 at 21:25
No objection to that, but using the same terminology to describe the response of an electron to a photon, say, is much like saying everything is a hor...
October 14, 2020 at 20:29
:heart: Well put. I'm gonna steal that.
October 14, 2020 at 13:49
I think you're doing okay without me, dude :D It's a good question. We certainly don't measure something as having a complex value, which could be a c...
October 14, 2020 at 13:38
That would be unnecessary according to the OP. It is sufficient that each particle knows where it is going. The statistical emergence of thermodynamic...
October 14, 2020 at 12:05
This is covered in the video. Local features may occur an infinite number of times. This is not what periodicity is, however. For something to be peri...
October 14, 2020 at 10:20
A problem completely avoided by not using terminology regarding psychological phenomena to describe non-psychological phenomena. Put it this way: a ho...
October 14, 2020 at 10:12
Quantum field theory is the most foundational theory we have, underpinning everything we know about except gravity. It might be that QFT can be genera...
October 14, 2020 at 07:03
Thanks. Then the answer is no, I think. It is illiberal to compel someone to give up their future liberty by exploiting their current desperation.
October 13, 2020 at 15:25
Just to clarify... Is the charity paying for the sterilisation or paying female drug addicts to get sterilised?
October 13, 2020 at 13:50
Again, I was not aiming to re-derive QM from scratch. If you want to know more about why individual electrons are waves, you can Google it.
October 13, 2020 at 11:41
Thank you for saying so :) In the simple symmetric Minkowski spacetime, yes, it is trivial, and I think that's fdrake's point too. If the idea isn't c...
October 13, 2020 at 11:33
Thanks jgill! Math is much harder, I think. My department didn't offer a general relativity course when I was an undergraduate, so I had to sit in on ...
October 13, 2020 at 06:39
The OP is not deriving QM, merely summarising it. Conversation would be pretty limited in scope if you have to re-derive from first principles everyth...
October 13, 2020 at 06:34
Something wherein electrons are not waves, i.e. something that is not quantum mechanics. And by all means, but elsewhere.
October 12, 2020 at 22:36
Visuals are not my strong suit, but I'm really trying :rofl: This is an oversimplified example of how, beyond the perfect symmetry of SR, retarded and...
October 12, 2020 at 20:31
You can still calculate invariant quantities for photons even if you cannot construct a rest frame for them. The proper time is an example. Literally ...
October 12, 2020 at 19:38
No, it's a good question. The first part of the answer is that they are both independently solutions to the relativistic wave equation. This is differ...
October 12, 2020 at 19:32
I propose a rejection of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Ideas about the nature of radiation that are different to quantum mechani...
October 12, 2020 at 16:44
The notion of duration and distance is meaningless for a photon, yes. While you can't choose a reference frame with a velocity of c, you can see that ...
October 12, 2020 at 16:31
Yes, but also the concepts of duration and distance. As the new Nobel laureate Sir Roger Penrose says, photons can't get bored.
October 12, 2020 at 15:46
As stated previously, the OP is regarding QM, and nothing outside that framework. Feel free to start a thread on the subject you'd obviously prefer to...
October 12, 2020 at 14:59
Maybe, but that does not fall within the scope of the OP, which concerns quantum mechanics, not alternative theories to quantum mechanics.
October 12, 2020 at 12:55
This is also treated in the OP. As I said, this is uncontroversial, and the purpose of the OP is not to compare QM with idiosyncratic theories. In QM,...
October 12, 2020 at 12:54
Ha! Ah, I see the misunderstanding. I meant it as a chronological voyage of discovery. We conclude the beam is a wave from the interference pattern. W...
October 12, 2020 at 10:29
I can see that you're keen to do so, but that is not a logical argument. The particular issue in question only occurs in one interpretation of QM, the...
October 12, 2020 at 05:48
Did he say it in a children's book?
October 11, 2020 at 22:08
That might well introduce some peculiar kind of meaning to the believing mind, although it's not in any sense shown here. But what you're talking abou...
October 11, 2020 at 19:16
I'm afraid not. If there are no other electrons to interfere with, and the electron does not interfere with itself, there is no possibility of interfe...
October 11, 2020 at 16:33
Inconceivable = untrue? How Cartesian!
October 11, 2020 at 16:29
I welcome identification of any deficiencies. However, the concepts in question are those of non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics, in w...
October 11, 2020 at 16:12
MWI is much more severe than Copenhagen in this respect. Entanglement of superposed terms always leads to branching in the former but does not necessa...
October 11, 2020 at 12:57
To expand on Cat's response, some orbitals have 'nodes' where the probability of finding the electron in that orbital is zero. However, the volume the...
October 11, 2020 at 12:21
Here's an idea... If you're going to go over-the-top on fake tan, do the backs of your hands as well. https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/a7b2b860b4ad6ab13...
October 11, 2020 at 12:04
Looks like the only way to keep going in pro-fascism America is to hire your own fascists. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/11/man-shot-de...
October 11, 2020 at 10:52
Mind blown. They keep this bit quiet. :heart:
October 11, 2020 at 09:53
Ah okay, so MWI-stylee.
October 10, 2020 at 22:00
Okay, I get it, I dig it, and I almost agree with it. This obviously isn't the case for the Higgs. For instance, the electron interacts with the Higgs...
October 10, 2020 at 19:24
Okay... So all elementary behaviours are then creation and annihilation events that, in the frame of reference of the thing being created and annihila...
October 10, 2020 at 18:52
Like the username 'ThePhilosopher'. Bet you were gutted!
October 10, 2020 at 18:17
This is what I mean by your seeming wilful misunderstanding. I did not say the choices were Copenhagen or MWI. I chose my words carefully, you simply ...
October 10, 2020 at 11:05
:fire: :100:
October 10, 2020 at 07:22
That is actually true. If you're citing Trump, you got nothing.
October 10, 2020 at 07:20
Falsification is a criterion of real science, i.e.the circular process of modelling, prediction and experiment.
October 10, 2020 at 07:13
Yes, obviously with the 'in principle' caveat: there are potentially possible modes of experience that we will, through localism, dumb luck, or techno...
October 09, 2020 at 19:18
Well, it's a cosmological model. The whole field is a little sketchy. But on the other hand it might be true, and the possibility must be accounted fo...
October 09, 2020 at 16:36
Doesn't this then reduce to good intentions? What we're really describing here is expectations. Part of making a moral choice is an expectation of an ...
October 09, 2020 at 16:28
Not at all. It is possible that determinism holds at a statistical level. As I've said a few times, if we ever devise a test to discern whether QM is ...
October 09, 2020 at 16:21
Let's put this in context: it's neither as amazing or alarming as a giant sky lord judging me for masturbating.
October 09, 2020 at 12:56
Oh yeah, it's not a popular interpretation of QM.
October 09, 2020 at 07:08