You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

I'm tempted to say that philosophy proper spans Plato - Hegel but that might be a bit contentious. But in any case, there's a sense of a vertical dime...
September 15, 2016 at 05:11
How could you know? Or rather, how could you tell someone else about it? 'One fine bright Sunday morning, a Catholic priest decided to sneak out and h...
September 15, 2016 at 03:58
Saying they are 'human words' is basically denying it. It is the science that says that only human beings are capable of forming an intention, that is...
September 15, 2016 at 03:43
But all of that overlooks the purported revelation of God in the Biblical tradition. I know there are plenty who will simply dismiss all of it, but I ...
September 15, 2016 at 03:22
That's what I'm saying - in ancient philosophy the primary distinction was been 'reality and appearance' - the 'ordinary people' (the hoi polloi) were...
September 15, 2016 at 01:35
Objectivity as a criterion of truth is very much associated with the rise of modern philosophy; it was never much considered by the medievals. I recal...
September 15, 2016 at 00:52
Regarding definition of exist - 'ex-', outside of, apart from; 'ist', to stand.
September 14, 2016 at 23:54
I would never have expected that from you. These are the basic attributes of the first cause, they're part of what the term means. Using words loosely...
September 14, 2016 at 23:44
It's just pointless wordplay ( this). It's not at all, it has a serious pedigree in neoplatonist and other Western philosophy. There were some seminal...
September 14, 2016 at 21:18
Anyway, everyone here should realize 'the uncaused cause' could not exist. All kinds of things exist - why, open any encyclopedia - but 'the uncaused ...
September 14, 2016 at 11:24
Who brought up 'the afterlife'? Anyway, I digress, the point was only about 'being a believer'.
September 14, 2016 at 11:14
But I wanted to know. I didn't want to believe in 'pie in the sky when you die'. I said there was a way of knowing about ultimate truths, not simply s...
September 14, 2016 at 10:33
There's a term that is encountered in comparative religion and philosophy, which is that of the 'sapiential traditions'. Sapience originally meant 'wi...
September 14, 2016 at 01:36
That's what's called 'empiricism'. A fundamental principle is that whatever is to be considered as a datum must be able to be observed by the senses (...
September 14, 2016 at 01:06
I want to raise a mild objection to this categorisation. I have always resisted 'belief' as such; there is something I don't like about 'people of fai...
September 14, 2016 at 00:08
Most in our secular world have put everything marked 'religion' in a box and sealed it. Then they're concerned that if anything prized the lid open, i...
September 13, 2016 at 10:33
'Miracles are not contrary to nature, but only contrary to what we know about nature' ~ Augustine The issue with reincarnation in particular is that i...
September 13, 2016 at 08:21
I rest my case ;-)
September 13, 2016 at 05:25
The other point that should be made is that I did bother to get one of Stevenson's books out of the library. It contains masses of data - literally hu...
September 13, 2016 at 03:39
I know the skeptics forum believes that it has discredited Stevenson's research. Stevenson always only claimed to present evidence that 'suggests the ...
September 13, 2016 at 03:24
Oh, I just got the impression, that when you asked for documentation of anything actually 'supernatural/magical', that you assumed that of course ther...
September 13, 2016 at 01:19
Where in the world can that happen? What are instances of that?
September 13, 2016 at 01:16
You clearly say that without any knowledge of Stevenson's research, which observed the same kinds of empirical protocols of any other social science r...
September 13, 2016 at 01:08
Thanks, those comments from Kojeve are illuminating (although I read somewhere recently that Kojeve has been outed as a KGB spy.) I had the idea this ...
September 12, 2016 at 23:54
I once had the idea 'you couldn't have a "theory of everything" because "the theory" would have to be included in the "everything" that is the subject...
September 12, 2016 at 10:55
Some examples of successful scientific explanations: Germ theory - explained epidemics and communicable diseases Copernican astronomy - explained the ...
September 12, 2016 at 08:49
It's probably un- or sub-conscious.
September 12, 2016 at 06:02
A book of note - Weapons of Math Destruction, Cathy O'Neill. In relation to 'technological rationality'.
September 12, 2016 at 01:37
Ian Stevenson's research on past-life memories has a large body of actual research, of the same kind you would find in support of epidemiological stud...
September 11, 2016 at 21:00
The many worlds hypothesis, and the multiverse hypothesis, are both supernatural (or metaphysical, means the same) because they're outside/beyond/supe...
September 11, 2016 at 13:19
Well, they would say they have, that it's in the Bible, that it is indeed big news, and that it's been disregarded by you. But the headline 'JornDoe d...
September 11, 2016 at 13:12
http://www.iep.utm.edu/substanc/#SH4a
September 11, 2016 at 12:24
Any arbitrary particle could be taken as an example of something with or without a starting point. Hey, thanks for clearing that up.
September 11, 2016 at 09:45
What are examples of things that don't begin to exist?
September 11, 2016 at 08:52
My point is relatively simple: the naive argument that the physical sciences have somehow eliminated the need to a 'supernatural' explanation, is not ...
September 11, 2016 at 07:51
The problem with panpsychism is that it 'objectifies' mind as some kind of essence or ethereal substance, which can be understood or viewed from the o...
September 10, 2016 at 22:36
The problem is JornDoe, that 'the beyond' has now become a necessary postulate for many modern cosmologists, in the form of the so-called 'mutlverse s...
September 10, 2016 at 21:49
How does the model allow for dark matter? Gotta know what it is to model it.
September 10, 2016 at 07:37
I really don't like the word 'spiritual for what I'm trying to describe, but we're stuck with it - google synonyms and you get 'religious' and 'sacred...
September 10, 2016 at 04:39
Duplicate post.
September 10, 2016 at 04:39
One answer is that all religion, art and science can do is point towards it; but it is never a 'that' for us, it is never an object of perception. But...
September 10, 2016 at 03:35
'Cartesian anxiety refers to the notion that, ever since René Descartes promulgated his influential form of body-mind dualism, Western civilization ha...
September 10, 2016 at 01:49
What about' What does 2 + 2 equal'? It sounds trite, but in that case, '4' is the terminus of explanation. There is no point asking 'why does 2+2=4'; ...
September 10, 2016 at 01:47
I think it is indutiably true that everything we know and experience is a 'brain state', to use that inelegant expression. (On the one hand, neural re...
September 10, 2016 at 01:40
Hitler had strong convictions.
September 09, 2016 at 12:24
Generally speaking, I have found this forum to be congenial and the moderating pretty light. Most of what annoys me, is either my fault, or the softwa...
September 09, 2016 at 09:49
But are Newton's laws of motion derived from more general laws? I think not. Certainly it has been found that the classical laws of motion don't apply...
September 09, 2016 at 06:52
Excellent points. I also recall a blog post I read a few years back to the effect that Aquinas' 'five proofs' were never intended as apologetic argume...
September 09, 2016 at 04:45
It's not about chemistry, it's about what makes chemistry possible. That is the sense in which it is related to the cosmological argument. Scientific ...
September 09, 2016 at 04:15
I was going to say that, but I didn't want to muddy the waters, and besides I agreed with the sentiment. But the idea that Buddhists reside in a kind ...
September 09, 2016 at 02:30