You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

I’m sure the point a materialist would make is that perspectives are also part of the illusion that the brain generates; ‘a perspective’ as such can’t...
November 24, 2017 at 08:15
Another point - all kinds of conditions can occur in brains, but illusions can only occur in cognitive systems. Illusions are mistaken judgements. I c...
November 24, 2017 at 06:08
The issue that QM made inescapable was that reality could not be that well-defined; when you get down to the nitty-gritty, the uncertainty principle c...
November 24, 2017 at 04:22
Except for in this case, it wouldn't have been an honest response. That is already a well-trodden path, in the form of 'logical atomism', one of the m...
November 24, 2017 at 02:36
What do you mean by "I mean"? Do you really "mean" something, or is that just a kind of neurological reflex, that is causing you to say that?
November 24, 2017 at 02:34
It means what it says. Your brain - the most complex single known natural phenomenon in the entire universe - consumes a large proportion of your body...
November 24, 2017 at 02:07
'Reality itself' eh? Philosophy as a discipline is based on questioning our innate sense of the reality of common experience. There is a fundamental s...
November 24, 2017 at 01:50
Could you elaborate on the use of "care" in this context? I get that they make a difference, or are bounds, or whatever, but I don't see how that adds...
November 24, 2017 at 00:40
As I’ve said that Dennett’s project is preposterous, then I had better explain it. The preposterousness of Dennett’s philosophical project is not hard...
November 23, 2017 at 23:13
But it starts from an idea. A building is a possibility that is realized physically.
November 23, 2017 at 05:12
On whose part?
November 23, 2017 at 01:18
I am of the view that Dennett's work is so preposterously mistaken that it ought not to warrant serious consideration. But that's also why I've said, ...
November 22, 2017 at 22:12
Thomas Nagel is Praised by Creationists Where Thomas Nagel Went Wrong (I do wonder if it's the only recorded accusation of being 'a teleologist'.) Fro...
November 22, 2017 at 22:08
All the things you've 'pointed out to me' over the years, amount to your explaining your point of view. We agree on some things, and disagree on many ...
November 22, 2017 at 20:45
I actually meant, by revealed truth, documents including The Bible. The ‘domain of discourse’ is about more than ‘feelings’, as it also describes alle...
November 22, 2017 at 09:42
That does leave something out, namely, the idea of there being a revealed truth. I mean, aside from what is felt about it, there is a domain of discou...
November 22, 2017 at 09:00
emanator, I would have thought, i.e. 'existence' emanates from this, not vice versa.
November 22, 2017 at 05:20
Checked, no problem here. Must be at the other end. ;-) (not *your* end...)
November 22, 2017 at 03:22
Or, orbiting teapots, or the flying spaghetti monster, or.... To discuss it under the heading 'philosophy of religion'? Perhaps it's really 'the uncon...
November 22, 2017 at 02:53
I reckon that seals it for once and for all. Wasn't even that difficult.
November 22, 2017 at 02:29
I can't honestly claim to know that details. It's the subject that Edward Feser is expert in. The nearest I could find is this: The modern concept of ...
November 21, 2017 at 23:28
Here, let's say 'A means: how to bake banana bread'. Ingredients 2 to 3 very ripe bananas, peeled. 1/3 cup melted butter. 1 teaspoon baking soda. Pinc...
November 21, 2017 at 23:16
Most of what you've argued in this thread is that the law of identity means that the meaning of 'the same' is not actually 'the same'; or that A doesn...
November 21, 2017 at 20:11
But it’s just not true., The nature or existence of purpose, design, intention - none of these are scientific questions at al. Certainly naturalism pu...
November 21, 2017 at 19:53
Well, beg to differ. I've worked an eight-hour day all my life (although currently I'm between contracts). There are times when I don't seem connected...
November 21, 2017 at 10:54
Ordinary life can be the theatre of practice, but it takes work.
November 21, 2017 at 10:16
'That' meaning...?
November 21, 2017 at 10:13
The key is ‘the way of negation’. That is something known in both Christian and Buddhist philosophy. It sounds very complicated when you try and artic...
November 21, 2017 at 09:49
Not an easy distinction to explain, I will admit.
November 21, 2017 at 08:56
I wasn’t meaning to patronize, but not a lot of people get that there can be ‘non-empirical beings’. I think the idea that the world is a gratuitous c...
November 21, 2017 at 08:15
There was a passage I found on an Aquinas-related site which I thought laid it out pretty well - it’s here. Worth reading carefully, I think - it real...
November 21, 2017 at 05:01
No, he doesn't say the opposite at all. In The God Delusion, he presents an elaborate argument along the lines that 'life only had to start once' and ...
November 21, 2017 at 02:11
Only to turn it upside down. The distinction being made here is between 'being' and 'existing'. You might say of 'the first principle', that it IS, bu...
November 21, 2017 at 02:01
Many, over the years. But that's *not* ad hominem, 'attacking the person' - it says, Dennett is a great person (which I'm sure he is) but NOT because ...
November 21, 2017 at 01:45
Because you’re saying, I don’t have any argument or reasoned criticism, but just a ‘condemnation’, when I make an effort to present reasons for my vie...
November 20, 2017 at 23:28
I've created a separate thread on this topic as it is far from the OP.
November 20, 2017 at 23:01
If you would like to argue specifics, rather than just throw lazy ad homs, I would be more than happy to participate.
November 20, 2017 at 22:46
I stand by all of them. Again, my criticism of Dawkins, Dennett, and their ilk is purely on the grounds of their scientific materialism for which they...
November 20, 2017 at 20:36
Your ‘ideal world’ would inevitably be a totalitarian autocracy. Why? Because it’s based on one person’s ideal, and assumes that all would agree; ther...
November 20, 2017 at 20:26
Oh yeah I do remember that exchange now you mention it. I had assumed all the little tweaks and features, like ‘internal replies’, would have meant cu...
November 20, 2017 at 19:42
I think your take on Aristotle is far too concretised, as I have said. In Aristotle, there are degrees of reality - things can be more or less real. T...
November 20, 2017 at 09:21
Doesn't this say that there is a photon prior to it being measured? That is exactly what is at issue in all of this. Whereas the Aristotelian view tha...
November 20, 2017 at 03:16
There's an article by Robert M. Wallace, Hegel's God, although some of it is pretty murky, in my opinion. But it is introduced with the statement that...
November 20, 2017 at 02:12
I always thought it was a simple cock-up. They couldn’t maintain the code, which had been very heavily customised over many years, so when it broke an...
November 20, 2017 at 01:18
If you read the OP that this thread starts off with, it does highlight that aspect of his character. But the problem I then have is distinguishing thi...
November 20, 2017 at 00:44
I would think that the solution proposed in that paper would obviate the requirement for Everett’s theory, but you’re right, we shouldn’t let Schrödin...
November 20, 2017 at 00:37
it’s a philosophical issue not strictly speaking a question of physics. That’s what makes it both relevant and interesting. And it is being proposed s...
November 20, 2017 at 00:10
The problem is the word ‘objective’. That word didn’t come into use until around the 18th century. But the Ideas of Plato were not simply in individua...
November 19, 2017 at 23:25
You mean, this question: Because it is impossible to demonstrate that there is anything answering to the description of ‘spirit’ that is ‘imminently b...
November 19, 2017 at 23:18
Have a look at this article which discusses Aristotelian ‘potentia’ in relation to physics. (Ironic, considering. Even mentions acorns.)
November 19, 2017 at 23:04