His definition seems a little vague because it potentially applies to an inexplicably special anything. An anthropologist would likely emphasize some ...
May I ask, what's your view of mathematics? Do you think it has adequate descriptive power? When you talk about the possibility of interlevel relation...
With the above criticism in mind I'd like to commend you for having the courage to systematize your thoughts. Everyone has a personal ontology and mak...
Yeah, norms change which is why surveys may be repeated. Ideally maybe like once a year. Until then I'm afraid the concept of "morality" is likely to ...
Of course. Science is about discovering what is the case, not what should be the case. Obviously it's not perfect. But it's at least empirical. To my ...
Interesting topic. I notice the issue of practicality has been raised. I wonder how people feel about a hypothetical global human survey which somehow...
In my view the so-called "theory of everything" is slightly hyperbolic. I think the interdisciplinary problem you've identified is a major one. I unde...
It's fairer to say this is an issue about individual people doing science, not scientists as a species. There are already a number of ethical codes in...
I don't know. But I can offer a psychological perspective. I maintain a lot of things boil down to personality, but that area of research is currently...
If you're okay with a semi-serious answer, I'd venture our collective human ignorance will always present the appearance of genuine choice, which I'm ...
Hi. Excuse me if this is somewhat obvious but it may be worth remembering "science" isn’t a single entity to be analyzed using identical systems follo...
Comments