You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Luke

Comments

Even if your bare assertion that people often act in ways outside of conventions and unspoken rules were true, people more often act in ways inside of...
February 07, 2021 at 01:40
No, you haven't. Conventions, unspoken rules, and the unwritten rules of baseball are not impossible to be followed. These are all relevant rules. Our...
February 06, 2021 at 23:13
I'm not defining "rule" in some other way. The Google definition is of a rule in the sense of "rule-following"; a rule which can be either explicit or...
February 06, 2021 at 13:08
I don't know about "repeatedly". You didn't say this until the previous page (page 11). Before that, you had made the absolute claims that "a rule mus...
February 06, 2021 at 05:08
There's a delicious irony here: you demonstrate that you have understood my point that a rule can be defined as either #1 or #2 - as explicit or under...
February 05, 2021 at 14:29
What purpose? There was no purpose. Instead, you made these absolute claims: You make no mention of context or purpose here. Instead, these are absolu...
February 05, 2021 at 04:45
That doesn't answer the question. You clearly disagree with the dictionary definition which states that a rule can be either "explicit or understood"....
February 04, 2021 at 05:59
I don't recall having this discussion.
February 03, 2021 at 04:38
Are you saying the dictionary definition is incorrect? Try these: Convention_(norm) Unspoken_rule Unwritten_rules_of_baseball :roll: This is meaningle...
February 03, 2021 at 04:34
Because nobody else wanted to be you.
February 01, 2021 at 23:00
Children are often corrected when they learn to talk, by parents, teachers and others. They may not be taught explicit rules - that's my point - but t...
February 01, 2021 at 05:29
How is language use any different to these sorts of rule-governed activities? Language use is itself an activity that we are taught how to do, with ru...
January 31, 2021 at 00:04
It's only a website link, so not sure why it wouldn't work for you, but here it is again: https://www.academia.edu/42996392/Wittgensteins_grammar_thro...
January 30, 2021 at 03:54
Do these "more animalistic" forms of communication have rules? It's a simple solution for you to claim that language is necessary for rules but rules ...
January 30, 2021 at 03:05
The article I linked to in this earlier post may help: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/493421
January 29, 2021 at 06:56
If communication is a pre-requisite to learning, as you claim, then a child without language should not be able to learn, right? But children - who st...
January 29, 2021 at 05:01
It's not so black-and-white. You have to allow for learning and intermediate stages of development and capability. Children can learn the rules of gra...
January 28, 2021 at 04:44
It might be better to say that grammar is not easily surveyable, as in, not able to be taken in at a glance. Wittgenstein doesn't say much about it, b...
January 27, 2021 at 08:52
Wittgenstein's metaphorical contrast of "rough ground" with "slippery ice" are both found on the ground (obviously). Wittgenstein advocates a return t...
January 26, 2021 at 02:04
I agree. I was probably insufficiently clear that I had traditional (pre-OLP) philosophy in mind in reference to this desire for something "higher"; t...
January 25, 2021 at 09:05
I question whether it is necessarily a fear (e.g. of doubt) that motivates all skepticism or all philosophy. I think the philosopher's desire for an u...
January 25, 2021 at 05:02
I think family resemblances are more about a contrast to essentialism rather than representationalism. Having said that, I am enjoying the ambitious d...
January 21, 2021 at 04:24
How do you expand access and opportunity? Redistribution of access and opportunity does not work? People have to expand their own access and opportuni...
January 15, 2021 at 04:56
Isn't fairness a zero sum game? How can you make things fairer without increasing the advantages of the disadvantaged and decreasing the advantages of...
January 14, 2021 at 06:29
I believe the relevant quote - or, at least, the one I am familiar with - is this: The above link gives the source as "Letter to Besso's family (March...
January 13, 2021 at 05:42
Then why attribute this view to Wittgenstein and say that he “did not have available to him other ways of conceiving ‘thinking’”? AFAIK, Wittgenstein ...
January 10, 2021 at 20:04
You stated - or, at least, strongly implied - that, for Wittgenstein, 'thinking' is a "classical reflective cognition" according to which "one consult...
January 10, 2021 at 02:24
You've got a lot of work to do to demonstrate that Wittgenstein was committed to this (narrow) view of thinking or understanding. I'm not sure where y...
January 09, 2021 at 03:56
To quote Wittgenstein:
January 06, 2021 at 06:31
There are English teachers. Your position must be that there is no such thing as an English, French or German language/speaker because each individual...
January 06, 2021 at 05:38
@"Joshs" - your OP seems to be more about one's "subjective understanding" of a public language, rather than about a private language, as per Wittgens...
January 06, 2021 at 04:50
You appear to collapse the distinction between a public and a private language such that all language is private. Against what “field, ensemble or ges...
January 06, 2021 at 01:44
If English is a private language, then what would a public language look like? Is a public language possible in your sense?
January 05, 2021 at 22:11
Sure, the model may have a use, but some people think it matters whether or not time actually flows when discussing the nature of time. Does the block...
January 05, 2021 at 04:48
Is it a language? If so, in what sense is it private and not a public language (such as English)?
January 05, 2021 at 04:13
:up:
January 03, 2021 at 04:16
@"Banno" doesn't recognise a distinction between the appearance of flow and actual flow, so he ends up logically excluding the possibility that the ap...
January 03, 2021 at 03:48
I've repeated it several times: "in the block universe model, time doesn't flow." Then time does flow. Huh?
January 03, 2021 at 03:12
Do you have any supporting evidence for this assertion?
January 03, 2021 at 02:45
Right, so you are logically excluding the possibility that time passing is an illusion. In other words, you are saying that time must actually pass. I...
January 03, 2021 at 02:26
The appearance of time flowing could be an illusion. Time actually flowing cannot be an illusion.
January 03, 2021 at 01:49
I do not agree with you that "time appearing to flow and time flowing are exactly the same", nor that time actually flows in a block universe.
January 03, 2021 at 01:40
The news article states that "in the block universe model, time doesn't flow", so any appearance of time flowing in the block universe can only be an ...
January 03, 2021 at 01:28
So the block universe model and the illusion of temporal flow are logically impossible?
January 03, 2021 at 01:07
Okay, but you are contradicted by the article which states: And you still haven't provided any support for your claim that time actually passes in a b...
January 03, 2021 at 00:50
It wouldn't look different. The only difference is that temporal passage is an illusion in a block universe. If the appearances may or may not be illu...
January 03, 2021 at 00:39
Obviously time appears to pass, whether illusion or not. But you seem to take this as some sort of evidence that we inhabit a block universe: It is al...
January 03, 2021 at 00:29
Yes, you said that already. What support do you have for your claim that: Pointing back to the article that states that "in the block universe model, ...
January 03, 2021 at 00:08