You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pinprick

Comments

The answer to this really depends on how easily influenced the general population is, which itself somewhat depends on how charismatic the president i...
August 08, 2020 at 05:24
I think “embracing death” is fuzzy as to what that actually means. Accepting it as opposed to resisting it or being in denial of it? Finding comfort i...
August 07, 2020 at 15:04
It’s worse than that where I live. I’d estimate it to be about 50/50..on a good day. There have been several occasions where I was the only person in ...
August 06, 2020 at 22:32
Also in Christianity, where things “of the flesh” or “of the world” are regarded as negative or sinful, and matters of the soul considered positive, a...
August 06, 2020 at 21:57
@"TheMadFool" I think every person becoming “enlightened” would essentially be heaven on Earth. Also, if you’re interested, this conclusion is somewha...
August 06, 2020 at 21:52
Gotcha. So you could be ethical, but also amoral in your distinction.
August 05, 2020 at 13:17
Not necessarily. It doesn’t have to. It can be primarily concerned with how my actions affect me. If the broad goal of ethics is to live the good life...
August 04, 2020 at 04:29
But should we have a preference at all? If our galaxy was all that existed, should we feel more significant than we do now?
August 03, 2020 at 17:47
Thanks for the replies, but to clarify I guess I was interested in the feeling of insignificance. Often it seems that when people realize how much big...
August 03, 2020 at 17:38
Maybe hypothetically, but it’s realistically impossible to know. It’s not like someone behaves a certain way, then obtains a high IQ, and begins behav...
August 03, 2020 at 04:53
Community standards aren’t objective. Otherwise they would be universally applied.
August 02, 2020 at 22:02
The result of being cursed is the occurrence of a negative experience. Philosophy doesn’t necessarily lead to something negative.
August 02, 2020 at 21:43
Not exclusively, or absolutely. Why pick out this one value out many others?
August 02, 2020 at 21:28
Why?
August 02, 2020 at 00:45
I’m not arguing with this, I’m interested to see what you think about harming X in order to reduce Y’s harm. Or, Harming X in order to prevent future ...
August 02, 2020 at 00:35
Allowing bad acts to occur when you could have prevented it is morally judged as what in your opinion? Good, bad, or neutral? It seems to me that the ...
August 02, 2020 at 00:12
Not having a child involves the certainty that some will suffer as a result. The uncertainty is the amount of good the unborn person would have brough...
July 27, 2020 at 22:35
Fine. But the unborn child’s “protection” from harm is also predicated on the harm of others. As a third party, you must at least allow the harm of ot...
July 27, 2020 at 22:25
What types of suffering are necessary? Explain what you mean by necessary. It was necessary to stop her in order to prevent her from being injured, an...
July 27, 2020 at 16:40
You can’t experience pleasure if you’re dead. Suicide reduces suffering, but can’t increase pleasure.
July 27, 2020 at 06:02
You’re right. I was looking at it from the wrong angle. Maybe, maybe not. Personally, I don’t like strict negative utilitarianism. I’m not so quick to...
July 27, 2020 at 06:01
Always? If a nurse takes pleasure in vaccinating people it’s bad? Forcing my daughter to not jump out the window because I desire her safety is immora...
July 27, 2020 at 05:44
Suicide.
July 27, 2020 at 05:14
So possible, or potential suffering is worse than actual suffering that is occurring? Also, part of your critique of procreation is the expectation fo...
July 27, 2020 at 04:53
So using fertilization treatment to relieve the suffering of being unable to have children is permissible in your view?
July 27, 2020 at 03:23
I get it. But if that is the case, how do you explain so many people that judge life to be enjoyable or pleasant? Or, in a word, worth living? I don’t...
July 24, 2020 at 22:05
I would say just because a community truly believes they are doing what they believe to be in the best interests of human flourishing, doesn’t mean th...
July 24, 2020 at 21:46
I’m not really trying to present an argument. Antinatalism being good or bad seems to me to be a matter of opinion. It focuses on reducing harm, but t...
July 24, 2020 at 21:38
Yeah, I think I agree, but I’m not sure what point your trying to make.
July 24, 2020 at 21:04
Others acting unethically is also beyond one’s control. But the statement is still true nonetheless, right? If not, how would you answer the question ...
July 24, 2020 at 20:59
I guess technically that’s true, but it seems very unlikely that someone would never exhibit an ethical act. Besides, even if my offspring doesn’t tur...
July 24, 2020 at 04:49
You could just as easily flip this and say that procreation is ethical because it’s the only way to guarantee ethical actions.
July 24, 2020 at 04:28
Are you still you after you die and cease to experience?
July 24, 2020 at 04:25
Using this metric, I fail to see how the Shakers flourished... Had they flourished, they would still be around. Instead, they intentionally did the op...
July 24, 2020 at 04:20
I agree, but could it then be said that our intuition is to flourish? Perhaps the post hoc justification that occurs is just a recognition of this fac...
July 24, 2020 at 03:07
Well, I wouldn’t consider simply spending eternity in heaven flourishing. To me flourishing implies advancing, or progressing in some way; not just ex...
July 24, 2020 at 03:03
I think antinatalism fits this. For a particular community, consider the Shakers.
July 23, 2020 at 23:06
What are your reasons for wanting a philosophy degree? Are you wanting to start a career in the field? Pursuing a degree solely because of the reputat...
July 21, 2020 at 18:34
I don’t think that the need or desire to justify our values, etc. diminishes simply by believing nihilism. Intellectually, the nihilist is aware of th...
July 18, 2020 at 16:28
Largely for the sake of argument I took the position that it was possible to have the concept “me” without necessarily needing the concept “not me.” I...
July 18, 2020 at 16:08
:100: The outcome of this tension is a life of voluntary deception. It’s hopeless to try to universally logically justify our values, attachments, or ...
July 17, 2020 at 19:07
Sure. Go ahead and avoid critiquing any arguments I present... :roll:
July 17, 2020 at 19:02
I don’t know what the correct place to start would be. Assume I do because I’m a human, and humans have similar biology and experiences, or that I don...
July 16, 2020 at 19:47
That’s not what I mean. I mean that you cannot possibly know my thoughts, or lack thereof, unless I communicate them to you, and you cannot infer by m...
July 15, 2020 at 23:40
Ok. How are “thoughts” assessed? Being entirely private, it seems that thoughts would be inaccessible to someone that lacks the ability to communicate...
July 15, 2020 at 23:21
They can debate the validity of assumptions. Nihilism is usually a consequence of debate, or discourse. It is the conclusion that is drawn from the in...
July 15, 2020 at 23:16
You don’t have to. Doesn’t Nihilism do precisely this; reject all assumptions?
July 15, 2020 at 21:41
I’m not sure. Suppose I had been born entirely senseless; without vision, hearing, taste, smelling, or sense of touch. I have no way to consciously ex...
July 15, 2020 at 21:39
Agree means sharing a certain belief with others. I would say that there are levels of acceptance. Consider the person who “accepts” a certain law, bu...
July 13, 2020 at 04:20
I assume you are referring to an external world or objects (things to think about). I was meaning that to be included in “somewhere,” but I’m not enti...
July 12, 2020 at 05:21