And what an insightful point it is. Where do we rank Trump's character? Rape and pedophilia aside, what we do know for certain is this: "Climate chang...
Don't bother with these morally upstanding people helping to re-elect Trump. In their minds, if you vote Biden you're just as bad as Trump voters. It'...
You strike me as someone who has never seriously considered an idea outside of their own belief system in their lives. Of course Flynn is corrupt and ...
I see them as related. We simply don't consider most of our behavior reflectively, including sexual behavior (thoughts or actions). Any individual's p...
An interesting topic. Schopenhauer (and Freud of course) broke it wide open. The studies by Kinsey et al, Masters and Johnson, are worth looking into ...
We don't "all know" that, because that sentence itself has meaning. Does it or does it not mean anything? If it does, there's some meaning in the worl...
All of these things, as you well know, have been around for decades. But it's the degree to which they've been amped up. They don't even care about pr...
Getting discouraged is a surefire way to keep losing. Remember too: Even though 5 will vote for Trump, the large majority will vote for someone else (...
No I don't. I don't think most scientists think about or really care about the underlying philosophical assumptions or systems of beliefs that they ho...
It's a fair point, and if this were any other election (besides 2016) I might agree it would be worthwhile just to rile the population even more. This...
Appreciate the post, but I really don't know what you're asking me here. Perhaps you could be more straightforward. I think I've been fairly clear abo...
There's good evidence to suggest that, yes. The Sunrise Movement isn't based on Sanders as a leader. Nor was the Occupy Movement (in fact he was ridin...
No, it wasn't -- nor does any scientist believe that. Newton's theories are not "wrong," nor were "proven wrong." Yes, it's true that many simpletons ...
Getting back to the discussion after many digressions and diversions from the OP: _______________ Phusis is the basis of modern science. Why? Because ...
Who knows. Some say the younger voters just don't show up in the numbers that older voters do. I don't think it was manufactured either. There's a fil...
If it turns out he's guilty, and I hope he is, then maybe the DNC can prop up someone else. It'll never be Sanders, of course, but even Mayor Pete is ...
I don't hold them solely responsible. It's true that in South Carolina, for example, he did very well with Black voters, the elderly, etc. More of Ber...
Probability is the language of science. There is no proof; there are no absolute certainties. Scientists are always aware that new data may overturn o...
There was plenty of debate about Newton's theories, but the evidence was overwhelming. Nor was it proven "wrong" by Einstein or quantum theory. Not ev...
Ohhh, I see...tell me more! I'm interested in evidence which, in this case, is overwhelming. If you want to debate Keynesian economic policy and its e...
Sure there are plenty of unsolved problems and active debates in climate science. But if you look at the research papers coming out these days, the de...
Because climate science is "model based"? Global warming is not an output of computer models; it is a conclusion based on observations of a great many...
Good for you. I myself am agnostic about gravity and whether the Earth really is flat. Who knows? Things change. I'm also agnostic about God and the F...
No, I accept things that have overwhelming evidence -- like a spherical Earth, like that the holocaust happened, like evolution, like gravity, like cl...
I haven't what? Jesus you're a horrible writer. You've already given yourself away buddy. You've proven you only read fringe bullshit about climate ch...
Lol. Right, just like creationists have "one side" and "evolutionists" have another view. Or, better, flat-earthers have a view and NASA has another v...
And you definitely know, because you're so very informed. No, I've studied this for years actually. Yes, you've found two climate deniers who agree wi...
The IPCC is not the US government, it's a number of research institutes and thousands of scientists. Good to see you're very skeptical about things, y...
LOL. Oh, what a shocker. A well known (and well used by deniers) "skeptic." This is your example? Pathetic. Maybe read up on these people before spout...
One scientist who you don't remember. Can't read. Spinner of straw. Ridiculous claims without any evidence or sources. This last one is especially egr...
No, completely wrong. Saying the "only real good solid data" is embarrassing. There's a number of excellent sources of data on the climate, which you ...
Yes, really. No one -- not myself, not anything I've cited, is arguing CO2 is the only driver of climate change. It's a complete straw man. No, it isn...
Please do, and if you can point me to where he says we'll "easily survive." Lol. Right, and you know because you're a climatologist. Please explain wh...
No one is arguing this. Pure straw-man. Yes, methane is a more potent greenhouse gas, but doesn't last nearly as long as CO2. There's also plenty of o...
No, they won't "tell you" because there are a number of projections which depend on what we do now. If we do remain with the status quo -- we're toast...
I've changed my mind. "Organizing" and "activism" are stoopid. Better to be a political hobbyist. But make sure you don't vote Biden, because doing so...
Joe Biden's policies on the environment vs. Trumps: Eh, sounds good but could be just a bunch of nice words. Now Trump's climate change plan: "It's a ...
"If Trump is re-elected, it's an indescribable disaster. It means that the policies of the last four years, which have been extremely destructive to t...
That's why I said an authority that provides evidence which I could check. As I've shown repeatedly, that's not what I said. I mentioned someone once ...
Comments