There's nowhere to go or hide from climate change. That's pure delusion. Helping elect Trump all but guarantees we're going over the edge. We have to ...
Yes. If other countries can do it, so can we. Corporations, no -- at least not the ones involved in fossil fuels, of course. And not governments that ...
You're too stupid to understand, but mobilizing hundreds of thousands of people is exactly what has changed the DNC, regardless of their robbing Berni...
Okay bud, you're right. Your expert adolescent analysis is too overwhelming. Let's teach those DNC guys a lesson they'll never forget and elect TRUMP ...
Everyone knows both parties are beholden to corporate interests. That goes without saying. What you continually ignore is the reality of differences b...
Lol. It's just a fact, actually: voting third party or sitting out helped elect Trump. That's not "gaslighting," and quite apart from blaming people. ...
Wonderful. It worked well last time, didn't it? This is true only for those who believe pushing a button every four years it the most important thing ...
No, electing Trump was tried in 2016. That actually happened, in no small degree thanks to those who sat out or voted third party (or even for Trump, ...
I would love to do that more than anyone. There's no proof that that works, and it was tried in 2016. We simply can't afford to do it again, because i...
As far as the OP -- I'm glad to see very few voting for Trump. But those voting third party or not voting, depending on the logic (safe state or not),...
You leave out the most important: climate change. It would be nice to have a planet in the future, I think. So yes, I value any chance of making that ...
No, he's being realistic. That's the unfortunate choice -- it'll be Biden or Trump. That's A or B. What requires delusion is voting for Donald Trump a...
In many ways, both those "marginal differences" in the most powerful country on Earth actually do make a difference. Although in this case, it's not a...
Right, so let's throw votes away and re-elect Trump. Because THAT'S what changed the DNC in 2016, of course -- not this silly "organizing and activism...
Or the environmental regulations being destroyed, the Paris Accords being scrapped, the climate change denial of the former oil lobbyists now running ...
This is your reasoning? Or 3: progressives elect Biden and continue to hold his feet to the flame -- something which is totally impossible with a Trum...
He's already made concessions. I mentioned some already. Is it more or less "delusional" than believing Trump will be swayed by pressure? Electing Tru...
Let me make it as simple as I can for you: It's precisely that we want to have an administration we can influence (we progressives), thus being the ex...
OK, this is actually a valid point. I would hardly say I'm "hurling abuse" though. All right -- yet one can hardly blame someone for getting frustrate...
He's already agreed to a $15 minimum wage, thanks to trying to court Bernie voters. He's much more open to progressive environmental policies than Tru...
We don't know if he raped her or not. But if he did, no one is saying that's right. He should be tried and convicted. There's also a thing called the ...
This is a very good point indeed, and the most important. It's completely ignored by the likes of "Baden" and others, who are determined to help Trump...
Yes, very simple: help re-elect Trump, clearly the most evil and most damaging. And why? Because a) it'll make you feel better about yourself, b) Bide...
Yes, by voting your conscience like you logically pure humanists. So admirable. Get Trump elected -- but that's beside the point. Biden is just as "ev...
"Won't adopt any of your ideas." Yeah, to political hobbyists like you, who do nothing except give your very deep political analysis (and thankful we ...
That point has hardly been "missed." No, it isn't. A vote for Biden is a vote to get Trump out of office. Then the work continues: not the analysis of...
Such righteous people, determined to vote their "conscience" yet again. Such pure convictions. Sure, Trump will be re-elected and continue destroying ...
I agree -- but no one is arguing that. Maybe. But perhaps not even that. It's not that scientists have to even understanding their sense of "being" (a...
I campaigned for Bernie, so I guess that makes me "progressive." I was and still am livid at the DNC's shenanigans (for the second time). I'm not alie...
I won't expect you to understand, since it's nuanced, but no I'm not. I don't like Biden at all, nor am I a "self-righteous Dem" -- I'm pointing out a...
No, as I've demonstrated over and over again -- from the OP onwards -- that the issue for analysis and discussion is phusis. "Elaborations on the Heid...
Which I explained. Take one example: the supposed opposition of Parmenides and Heraclitus. Heidegger rejects this. There was also no metaphysics in Ar...
"More being"? What does that mean? Dasein's existence is care, which gets re-interpreted later as temporality. Our thrown-ness, our falling, our proje...
There is no such "rule." But showing up just to announce you "don't think this thread is a good idea" is completely pointless. Generally grown adults ...
That's not what he's saying -- from my reading anyway. In fact "existence" is reserved for the being of human beings in Being and Time. To understand ...
Comments