You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Follow your aptitudes.
January 21, 2017 at 21:31
Realpolitik is the day-to-day of political decision making, as opposed to the ideology and ethics behind it. Given the time he has spent as a senator,...
January 21, 2017 at 21:29
Yes; I did not deem it necessary to state the obvious.
January 21, 2017 at 21:15
...as if the US were entitled to premiership.
January 21, 2017 at 21:14
Hm. Of course I agree that truth has no location. But better to avoid the reification of truth altogether, rather than in just the circumstances of lo...
January 21, 2017 at 06:04
your observation amounted to "Grayling sucks". Hardly quality critique.
January 21, 2017 at 00:47
Hm. If the United States enters into a trade war with China, it will lose. It will fade into economic obscurity much as Britain has since the first Wa...
January 20, 2017 at 23:00
The shouts in here are long enough to make one hoarse.
January 20, 2017 at 22:28
This would be a reification of truth, rather than of conformity?
January 20, 2017 at 22:21
Well, it's a liberal meme in that, as I pointed out in the OP, post-truth dialogue is unsustainable, and so post-truth politics must eventually fail. ...
January 20, 2017 at 21:51
Prefixing objective only serves to bring in confusion. The distinction between objective and subjective truth is either incoherent or amounts to no mo...
January 20, 2017 at 21:37
That's two distinct approaches to justification, not two distinct uses of truth.
January 20, 2017 at 21:30
One fool will follow the other.
January 20, 2017 at 21:17
The post-truth era of Trump is just what Nietzsche predicted
January 20, 2017 at 21:16
January 20, 2017 at 21:00
Only if your convictions are indeed correct. But why should we think they are? You are not at all convincing.
January 20, 2017 at 20:56
Why should I share your conviction that you are right about everything?
January 20, 2017 at 20:52
Why?
January 20, 2017 at 20:49
Should I care about your conviction?
January 20, 2017 at 05:05
OK. "Where does truth exist?" looks like a question about truth. But is it? Try treating it as a question about how we use the words "truth" and "exis...
January 20, 2017 at 04:28
It might be preferable to think of education as seeking to bring forth the potential found in each individual. Individuals are embedded in a social co...
January 19, 2017 at 22:49
Grayling, on this topic:
January 19, 2017 at 22:00
Is it? Why would you think that? Time and space are intimately related, aren't they?
January 19, 2017 at 05:21
There it is - out there.
January 19, 2017 at 05:10
This seems to imply that you think there can only be one occurrence of a given concept. But it would seem that the same concept occurs both here and t...
January 19, 2017 at 05:09
A classic example of the wrong question leading one down the philosophical garden path.
January 19, 2017 at 04:59
The brain? There is only one?
January 19, 2017 at 04:57
And yet there it is, on the screen. Odd.
January 19, 2017 at 04:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqL77G2x61E
January 12, 2017 at 00:18
Just watching. But I think the USA is fucked.
January 11, 2017 at 22:26
Indeed; hence "post-truth" dynamics do not lead to Rorty's paradise, but to Trump.
January 03, 2017 at 22:43
...
January 02, 2017 at 23:45
Another neat summation. My reply to Rorty would be that if all we have is conversation "disembodied" from the world around us, then those with existin...
January 02, 2017 at 22:05
So do we roll dice?
January 02, 2017 at 07:41
Yes; hence: Stoic at war.
January 02, 2017 at 07:40
So your point is... what? That serious philosophy comes from Aristotle and Plato, hence all else is wind? Were Aristotle and Plato the only true Scots...
January 02, 2017 at 06:55
I'm agnostic on days with a "t". Atheist most other days So it being a Monday, I'll mention G.K. Chesterton.
January 02, 2017 at 05:29
That tells us more about Plotinus than Epicurus. "Epicurean in peace, Stoic at war".
January 02, 2017 at 05:15
Cute.
January 02, 2017 at 00:03
Then again, it is worth noting when history repeats itself.
January 02, 2017 at 00:01
Hm. Hitler was a Nazi. The emphasis is on the superiority of the imaginary 'Aryan' race. The state is there for the benefit of the race. Fascism, as t...
January 01, 2017 at 23:39
Interesting stuff, Mollie.
January 01, 2017 at 22:37
I was referring to the efficiency of the health system. This sort of thing: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Health_Expenditure_per...
January 01, 2017 at 09:19
You think? Even if so, 1/14.
January 01, 2017 at 00:06
I suspect it would have made little difference. The ethos is such that any form of communal ownership is treated as suspect; evidenced by their utter ...
December 31, 2016 at 23:48
I'm using the term after Umberto Eco's criteria; easily found on Google.
December 31, 2016 at 22:52
Was that addressed to me?
December 31, 2016 at 22:22
Good read, Sophisticat. Source?? Just interested.
December 31, 2016 at 22:22
A tertiary piece, then. It caught my eye because it predicted the result. Neat summation. How do you think Sanders would have changed the vote? His an...
December 31, 2016 at 22:19
I maintain that the spin doctor and the bullshitter are distinct, so: Spin doctor - That is the truth, but it means this... Liar - That is the truth, ...
December 31, 2016 at 22:14