You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

You can believe what you like about the universe. That does not make it true. Deny a shared world and you have no basis for interpreting the utterance...
November 18, 2017 at 23:38
Feyerabend would disagree, suggesting that sometimes science might well progress because of such authoritarian stances. How could it not?
November 18, 2017 at 23:35
No, I don't. Statements can be true or false, regardless of someone's judgment. People believe things that are not true. Sure. And one can interpret a...
November 18, 2017 at 23:32
:D I've enjoyed your posts, Fire Drake. For the moment at least I am non-plussed. Think I might write a letter to my local member, though.
November 18, 2017 at 21:28
Davidson's triangulation - me, you and the truth. What you say might be the case in humanities, where what is the case is so much more dependent on so...
November 18, 2017 at 21:22
Cheerful in here, isn't it?
November 18, 2017 at 20:46
Then wouldn't it be appropriate for you to set out the atheistic arguments that are so poor, and show us the error of our ways? But you have not done ...
November 18, 2017 at 20:45
So again we just have to believe you.
November 18, 2017 at 20:35
So god hides himself, only allowing a few to know him, damning the others.
November 18, 2017 at 20:12
Said as much a few posts back. I also want to take care not to discard truth. And in bullshit? Truth does not enter into bullshit.
November 18, 2017 at 08:09
SIlence.
November 18, 2017 at 07:17
I wish you would not use that "thought/belief" construct; so ungainly. I find myself distracted by it. It leads to to the detriment of clarity in your...
November 18, 2017 at 07:14
Cheers. Wish I had writ it.
November 18, 2017 at 04:13
Since nobody understands Foucault, you should be used to that. O:)
November 18, 2017 at 04:12
So we just give in?
November 18, 2017 at 03:23
@"apokrisis" This is just to say that it is statements - sentences that make an assertion - that are true or false. That strikes me as a loaded questi...
November 18, 2017 at 03:09
It's bullshit. Lies used to sell a product that does nothing.
November 18, 2017 at 01:54
I agree - I don't see that the juxtaposition of objective agains subjective can be maintained. There are just true statements and false statements. El...
November 18, 2017 at 01:53
We charitably interpret the utterances of others so as to maximise the truth in what they say. The bullshitter derails this process by not caring abou...
November 18, 2017 at 01:44
What do you think of the suggestion that what has changed recently is not the existence of bullshit and lies, but the way they are received? Post-trut...
November 18, 2017 at 01:32
Yep. But that's not a paradox.
November 18, 2017 at 01:28
I've presented one several times, and you ignored it.
November 17, 2017 at 23:16
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"
November 17, 2017 at 23:08
The beauty of the OP is how clearly it shows the closed logic of certain thinking. That god exists is the premise on which the OP is constructed. No a...
November 17, 2017 at 07:57
Nor is that my intent. What I did do is show how your argument is self-serving, by demonstrating that in the hands of an atheist it serves to undermin...
November 17, 2017 at 03:42
Nor I. Why does God leave clues, like we are in an adventure game? Why not have "God Exists" inscribed in a different language each day over the risin...
November 17, 2017 at 03:33
Yeah, but it is entertaining. Watching Henri is like watching a contortionist.
November 17, 2017 at 02:46
that's not a bad question, either way. they don;t seem to be a good example of intelligent design.
November 16, 2017 at 23:56
That worked. Quietism wins.
November 16, 2017 at 20:06
So you don't understand how it works, but it does. Hm.
November 16, 2017 at 20:04
And therefore, Astrology? Seems to be something missing here.
November 16, 2017 at 20:02
Here's your horoscope for today: Astonishing, isn't it, how accurate it is!
November 16, 2017 at 19:58
Is that what Astrology is?
November 16, 2017 at 19:54
A fair point. I've noted how much effort is required in order to believe consistently that God can create a world with evil in it. Rather more effort ...
November 16, 2017 at 19:51
Hi, Time.
November 16, 2017 at 11:29
Hello. My name is Banno, and I am a recovering philosopher...
November 16, 2017 at 11:21
Why and how?
November 16, 2017 at 08:39
Inaccuracy We Trust. http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/astrology.html
November 16, 2017 at 08:30
Why belief in astrology is not a Good Thing - especially for women.
November 16, 2017 at 08:27
http://infobeautiful4.s3.amazonaws.com/2015/05/1276_horoscoped.png
November 16, 2017 at 08:16
Goodness, no. What on Earth are you suggesting?
November 16, 2017 at 04:22
But are we appreciated for our efforts? Not a bit.
November 16, 2017 at 03:40
Oh, I rather think it may be.
November 16, 2017 at 03:39
Well, thank you. Very kind. I do think that pain here and now is more pressing than the perfection of God's plan. Doubtless if I were a more thoughtfu...
November 16, 2017 at 03:37
Indeed, what's a few pointless, painful deaths in the big picture? Of course, we could flip your argument around, Reductio - style. Given that god exi...
November 15, 2017 at 22:43
I agree; you are quite right that if your premise is that God exists, then the existence of atheists is quite an extraordinary thing. Given the perfec...
November 15, 2017 at 21:56
This is exactly right. The argument in the Op is undeniable. Given the premise of there being a god, He must, by His divine nature, be evident in ever...
November 15, 2017 at 21:44
On a more practical note, will atheist organisations now be eligible for the same tax-free status as churches?
November 15, 2017 at 20:55
Presumably, since we atheists have fulfilled our part of His Devine Plan, we are bound for heaven.
November 15, 2017 at 20:38
@"VagabondSpectre", good to see you doing the Lord's work.
November 15, 2017 at 20:36