You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Is it open to a theologian to conclude that there is no god and remain a theologian? A philosopher may do so and remain a philosopher. As if blame wer...
July 22, 2025 at 22:42
Theology is not philosophy. Theology starts with a conclusion, and seeks to explain how it fits in with how things are. It seeks to make a given doctr...
July 22, 2025 at 22:25
Wouldn't a god that can interact with imperfect beings, and lead them to the light, be better than a god who cannot interact with imperfect beings? Bu...
July 22, 2025 at 22:13
The idea that children should be held responsible for the sins of their parents is also... problematic. Doubtless there are theological explanations. ...
July 22, 2025 at 22:08
We can agree on a dislike for the tone, to be sure. It was your suggestion to make use of it, and again you seem to renege when faced with the consequ...
July 22, 2025 at 21:57
Well, for my part, there appear to be issues of consistency that have been raised here that you and Tim have not yet addressed. Mind you, I haven't fi...
July 22, 2025 at 21:39
The premise here is that the aim of justice is punishment. Why should we accept that?
July 22, 2025 at 21:34
He said: So it seems your attempt to reach him was unsuccessful. Frank would not be the first name to come to mind hereabouts, as being "intellectuall...
July 22, 2025 at 10:34
:smile:
July 22, 2025 at 04:50
Conclusion. If "A picture captures a moment in a narrative", and some paintings do not capture moments in a narrative, then not all paintings are pict...
July 22, 2025 at 04:31
Yep. It looks like avoidance.
July 22, 2025 at 04:04
Is it? You asked what ChatGPT thought. It said: and proceeds to unpack a series of issues, ending with It might be helpful to at least recognise the d...
July 22, 2025 at 03:59
https://i.ibb.co/MxRx8FYL/image.png
July 22, 2025 at 01:47
Not so sure. But a discussion worth having. What might a Davidsonian aesthetic look like?
July 22, 2025 at 01:31
Oh, ok. You were just saying that the meaning of words is not fixed.
July 22, 2025 at 01:25
It might help if you were to explain what your case is... Here's mine: How does yours differ?
July 22, 2025 at 01:05
I'm looking forward to your doing so, then.
July 22, 2025 at 01:03
Oh, . it's just such a tidy koan.
July 22, 2025 at 00:44
Without an interpretation, how could the question have an answer?
July 22, 2025 at 00:38
Buggered if I know. See, perhaps, Encoding the Dreaming - A theoretical framework for the analysis ofrepresentational processes in Australian Aborigin...
July 22, 2025 at 00:35
You say Platonism is not needed, then launch immediately into an explication of platonism.
July 22, 2025 at 00:29
Trouble is, the custodians would not call it art. Art is an aesthetic judgement, an object detachable from it's surrounds, to be moved, sold or exhibi...
July 22, 2025 at 00:28
Ok.
July 22, 2025 at 00:08
Well, if you must. The idea that a black square only represents a black square looks a tad too platonic for my taste... it smells of perfect forms and...
July 22, 2025 at 00:07
Guess so.
July 21, 2025 at 23:17
Oh, perhaps Tim's engine will spin by itself. It's how it makes contact with the world that might make the difference. I don't see it gaining much tra...
July 21, 2025 at 23:13
Tim can't articulate your criticism in his terms, it seems.
July 21, 2025 at 23:10
Not really. It seems you think it consistent, but using a way of talking about consistency that is itself Thomist. Someone who thinks there is a diffe...
July 21, 2025 at 23:03
The artist's intention to create "a piece of art" will not suffice - They might be rubbish at their supposed profession. Being a piece of art is takin...
July 21, 2025 at 22:55
We're engaged in forming an "ontology", no? That amounts to sorting out what we are talking about. It seems useful to be able to distinguish a thing f...
July 21, 2025 at 22:36
The Op is satire. Frank asked "How does a person make sense of this?" You provide an answer in the sophistry of Thomism, which is quite unlikely to ap...
July 21, 2025 at 22:27
All of which just takes the Thomistic metaphysic as granted. An absurdity can seem internally consistent. This: may be as helpful as Summa Theologica.
July 21, 2025 at 22:14
Ok. In your first post you said a paining was a picture. Now you say that a picture need not be a picture of something, and so avoid the difficulty po...
July 21, 2025 at 22:00
Do you really think that there was a chance of @"frank" accepting Thomism as an answer to his questions? Wouldn't he simple see it as a more verbose e...
July 21, 2025 at 21:53
Thomism relies on divine simplicity. It understands god as pure and as simple. So mercy and justice are for god the very same. This is how Thomism res...
July 21, 2025 at 21:41
And you're happy to accept the Thomist metaphysics on which this account sits? A mediaeval logic? Nothing since then appeals more?
July 21, 2025 at 21:12
Interesting. So is art "intended"? If that were so, then the intent of the chap with the roller is what decides if the wall is art or not... We would ...
July 21, 2025 at 06:57
And this? https://www.thespruce.com/thmb/2QWeQ_k3TLK1l20SbMmpO76miOA=/750x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Stocksy_txpdc39b9790by0...
July 21, 2025 at 06:28
Is Rothko’s red rectangle a picture of a red rectangle? Or is it just… a red rectangle? https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/format:webp/1*5POrD...
July 21, 2025 at 05:28
Too far off topic.
July 21, 2025 at 03:33
Ontology is definition.
July 21, 2025 at 01:28
In: Assertion  — view comment
Well done. Yes, one of the take aways from all this is the separation of intent from meaning. Seeing how this works takes some effort. The idea that t...
July 21, 2025 at 00:08
:wink: Fair. So it comes down to what you value.
July 20, 2025 at 23:23
In: Assertion  — view comment
Good response. You've been reading his paper Intending? That's the topic there. There is no guarantee that our surmised intent is the correct one, no ...
July 20, 2025 at 23:21
Accepting that account requires accepting that Jesus is the son of god... it's in the first sentence. That's not philosophy.
July 20, 2025 at 22:21
They are not all pictures but can all count as pictures. Ok.
July 20, 2025 at 22:03
Can't say as I'd noticed.
July 20, 2025 at 03:06
Or fake it 'till you make it.
July 20, 2025 at 01:36
ChatGPT suggested that finely grated chocolate could be used to make a suspension in insulin, and perhaps an emulsion, providing the following recipe:
July 20, 2025 at 01:25
In: Assertion  — view comment
I don't disagree. Although asking someone to "dance the flamingo" need not be an intentional malapropism, and yet still be understood as a request to ...
July 20, 2025 at 00:42