You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

...we should take some pains to distinguish constructivism from intuitionism. As I've suggested, I don't see how constructivism is committed to finiti...
April 23, 2020 at 01:14
Oops. Too many open windows.
April 23, 2020 at 01:14
...we should take some pains to distinguish constructivism from intuitionism. As I've suggested, I don't see how constructivism is committed to finiti...
April 23, 2020 at 00:32
Nor am I, yet the article rang true. Nos' reaction will be more about Nos than about 'merica.
April 23, 2020 at 00:26
I'm flummoxed that Wittgenstein's argument might be so artless. And so, I'm asking for something more. So we have him baulking at the the diagonal and...
April 23, 2020 at 00:24
Yeah, I noticed that.
April 22, 2020 at 23:38
In: Logic  — view comment
So much the better for logic, then.
April 22, 2020 at 23:37
Evolution does not have a goal.
April 22, 2020 at 23:35
Perhaps - but it is so difficult to articulate.
April 22, 2020 at 23:03
But you can start anywhere... and you get the same number.
April 22, 2020 at 23:02
But one of the things we do, is to talk. And we can talk about our talk. Every few years I set up a forum game in which players take it in turns to ad...
April 22, 2020 at 23:00
Hm. We can choose to include or exclude whichever laws of logic we like, so long as we live with the consequences. Hence, Well, that is up to you. If ...
April 22, 2020 at 22:57
What?
April 22, 2020 at 22:52
I've pretty much given up on Harry. Too hard to make sense of his posts.
April 22, 2020 at 22:51
Their rejection of abstract entities remains unexplained - an intuition. I hope I explained - in outline at least - that abstract entities come form o...
April 22, 2020 at 22:49
Yep.
April 22, 2020 at 22:43
Thanks. Yep.
April 22, 2020 at 22:43
Thank you. I'm picturing this as direction of fit, as in Anscombe. That the number of things in the box is 3 is something we do; the direction of fit ...
April 22, 2020 at 22:42
For @"NOS4A2": We Are Living in a Failed State
April 22, 2020 at 22:01
:up:
April 22, 2020 at 10:03
Folk seem to be missing the point: why does Wittgenstein's constructivism lead to finitism?
April 22, 2020 at 10:01
Cheers. Reading.
April 22, 2020 at 06:50
Charity.
April 22, 2020 at 06:49
This... https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/12/1/1/2823712 ?
April 22, 2020 at 05:54
But hence the remainder of my post...
April 22, 2020 at 05:27
Cheers. And my apologies for baiting you with the OP. I needed a mathematician who might disagree with a constructivist approach to mathematics; the r...
April 22, 2020 at 05:05
From The Stanford article: Why finite sets? This seems an idiomatic use; and I;m not sure if it comes from Wittgenstein or Rodych Well, yes - if one a...
April 22, 2020 at 05:03
No, it doesn't. It doesn't refer to anything.
April 22, 2020 at 04:58
I've sympathy for that. I think it more like doing proper grammar than like metal detecting.
April 22, 2020 at 04:56
So you are well placed to help me. Would you be able to take a look at 2.2 Wittgenstein’s Intermediate Finitism? Can you follow the discussion of exte...
April 22, 2020 at 04:49
Yes, that. And mathematical Platonism is wrong.
April 22, 2020 at 04:46
That's not what I'm after here. What you have constructed is a contradiction; they can't both claim to be adding in the way we do and that 2+2=5; we s...
April 22, 2020 at 04:44
Yeah, but "StreetlightX" refers to StreetlightX in a way that "1" does not refer to 1. That is, whole there (presumably) is a StreetlightX, there is n...
April 22, 2020 at 04:41
Not this time. Trying to read Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics but I'm stuck on the way Rodych uses intension and extension. So the extension ...
April 22, 2020 at 04:39
Maybe. It comes from Wittgenstein. Do you think him naive? This thread is a branch from @"Sam26"'s Summary of the Tractatus.
April 22, 2020 at 04:23
Some one else put it there.
April 22, 2020 at 04:19
If set the task of describing the motion of drops of water on a window pane, we might well make use of 1+1=1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAvLtVXz...
April 22, 2020 at 04:14
You can get pills for that.
April 22, 2020 at 01:48
As do garbagemen.
April 22, 2020 at 01:43
No, they aren't.
April 22, 2020 at 01:38
Yeah, i read it. It is just an assertion. So it's of no use.
April 22, 2020 at 01:05
OK. I'll have a think about an appropriate thread; perhaps a more general question about mathematical extension.
April 22, 2020 at 00:54
You do understand that Wittgenstein overwhelmingly rejected Platonism...? (I know I will regret asking).
April 22, 2020 at 00:52
Is it of interest to you? I'm no mathematician; but of course I have opinions. Seems to me that mathematics is a built thing. So in that regard I'm wi...
April 22, 2020 at 00:36
That's good. I was worried you might realise he was a finitist, even as you seem to be, and come back with something cogent.
April 22, 2020 at 00:28
Not quite. I'm saying that one might do either, that the choice of to flip or stand is not rational. The body of the thesis was an explanation of how ...
April 21, 2020 at 23:10
Seems to be a theme here this morning. My Master's thesis was about organisational decision making; it made the obvious observation that organisations...
April 21, 2020 at 23:02
The trouble I have with this excellent analysis is that I'm not at al sure what a concept is. So I might just note that concepts, if they are anything...
April 21, 2020 at 22:55
Sure, you could find a solution - but would it be the right one? Would it set out what we ought to do? If you agree with the mooted solution, you woul...
April 21, 2020 at 22:43