He sets up the following, after Dawkins and Aquinas There is a god: Knowledge Conviction Guess Doubt Guess Conviction Knowledge There is not god. ...t...
So to the notion of faith, which I take to be the core of the new material in the article. Knowledge is justified, true and believed. This provides th...
You might find this interesting: How to deal with the Craig Kelly in your life: a guide to tackling coronavirus contrarians I'm proud to have been del...
Yes - I will happily add that I read out loud when proofreading difficult paragraphs or when there is considerable background noise or other distracti...
But much of the article is straight forward. Take: The conclusion Kenny is working towards is agnosticism. But with this piece, from the second page, ...
The anthropic principle. At the top of p. 389 there's some curious stuff differentiating metaphysical necessity from epistemological necessity. There'...
Yeah - that's right; these events took place the night before the trial. But I understand that the Apology was written before the Theaetetus. Correct ...
At p.387 Kenny offers three things that might not be explainable by evolution. The first of these is language. Since language is essentially a social ...
And so to Aquinas’ fifth. Here it is: Kenny's response is to question the very notion that god might have a mind at all similar to our own: "It is not...
Quarantine workers are first in line for immunisation - which hasn't commenced yet... The issue I foresee is a relaxation of restrictions during the l...
... so the conclusion is that God does not exist in every possible world... But next is the first real disagreement I have with Kenny. Possible World ...
I don't see anything too controversial in the first few pages. A fairly standard discussion of knowledge and belief. Some hereabouts will perhaps not ...
All good stuff. Cheers. Here's a thing to keep in mind: it's the laws of particular countries that are wrong, not the clothing they command. Sometimes...
I keep finding myself back there. Like a broken tooth, I can't stop poking it. I suppose I must admit an interest in the topic; one that is frustrated...
ah. so the discrepancy will go away if we do not talk about it. Shhh, folks; you're upsetting Gus. ...that goes for sexism, too. Black Women Confronti...
It's talk of an individual, not of people per se, Yes. However the assumption that in order to talk about some thing we first need to understand its e...
Not too sure what you are asking. I think the argument is cogent. However, there are things built in to it that show it to be a bit over the top. The ...
The better explanation is from Sartre. It's about people, rather than things. You find yourself here in the world, but without an identity, without an...
The phrase is supported by an argument; Descartes systematically doubts as many of his beliefs as he can until he finds something that he cannot doubt...
Ah, another lost catholic soul. There are more than a few of us around here. Spinoza. Anthony Kenny. But it's not that I am in disagreement with theis...
Actually, it's not seeing the issue that is the problem. At best, "...shouldn't..." But demonstrably, it does. That's a topic worthy of discussion. Wh...
Comments