You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

I'm not going to pretend to understand Berkeley.
June 22, 2021 at 21:57
Who, me?
June 22, 2021 at 21:42
The OP is pretty muddled, moving between sensing and force and existence without much clarity. But the rough idea seems to be a version of Stove's Gem...
June 22, 2021 at 21:40
In: Bannings  — view comment
Actually, since it's a private forum, they can do what they like. And I like what they do. Mostly. If anything I'd like to see more bannings. But if y...
June 22, 2021 at 03:13
In: Bannings  — view comment
It's not the opinion that earns the ban. That seems to be a point that is repeatedly missed.
June 22, 2021 at 00:59
In: Bannings  — view comment
:grin:
June 22, 2021 at 00:49
In: Bannings  — view comment
Except Baden. Get rid of him.
June 22, 2021 at 00:48
In: Bannings  — view comment
This isn't a fucking democracy. Most folk here can't recognise a decent argument when it's right in their faces. Putting mod powers in their hands wou...
June 22, 2021 at 00:47
Stove's Gem - again, again and again.
June 22, 2021 at 00:42
But I did engage - a direct criticism of your opening argument. Ah, fuck I did it again.
June 20, 2021 at 21:50
Here's a black swan that's white: ABC News
June 20, 2021 at 21:17
Too big for crows. And crows don't paddle around. You know, that recent comment of yours about only one post per week might have merit.
June 20, 2021 at 21:09
It becomes complicated. Belief is a second-order predicate, so there are four, not two, variations. a) One can believe that something is the case. b) ...
June 20, 2021 at 21:05
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
That's a much better articulation of your argument.
June 20, 2021 at 20:58
My bad. I should have take my own advice.
June 20, 2021 at 20:17
Well, I'd supposed that "private meaning" might be a marker for you - "here be dragons"; but that doesn't seem to be the case.
June 20, 2021 at 20:16
Since you asked, this: ...is wrong. Indeed, it's guileless. It is precisely the extent to which "our faculties of awareness" give us knowledge of what...
June 20, 2021 at 07:30
Yep.
June 20, 2021 at 07:08
Have a good close look at the last couple of posts from Bart and a think about his logical skills. Then decide if you really want to agree with his ar...
June 20, 2021 at 07:07
...you're really not helping yourself here...
June 20, 2021 at 06:58
June 20, 2021 at 06:54
We seem to be a long way off course - private meaning and so on.
June 20, 2021 at 06:49
Not at all sure what you are asking. What then are the different, not-publicly-agreed upon uses that different people try to use...?
June 20, 2021 at 05:59
No, there is information being exchanged. But that's a relatively small part of the interaction. The learning has perhaps more import. What is certain...
June 20, 2021 at 05:18
Such contortions. OK, so you place yourself alongside Bart in the irrational basket.
June 20, 2021 at 03:19
And not clever enoughto phrase the problem in a considered, respectful way.
June 20, 2021 at 03:16
Your making unsupported assertions. I'm recounting what I have seen. Folk are complicated. Let 'em work it out for themselves. They don't need middle ...
June 20, 2021 at 03:03
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
Yeah, that was the shared joke at the root of the creation of this thread from the other.
June 20, 2021 at 02:56
Do not pass what? Wind? I've worked with trans children and seen the difference that recognition makes to them. I don't pretend to understand transsex...
June 20, 2021 at 02:51
If it is inaccessible, then it's of no consequence. Contrive a possible world in which a contradiction occurs: in which both P and ~P are the case, in...
June 20, 2021 at 02:41
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
...and when put to the test, fails to give a satisfactory account.
June 20, 2021 at 02:35
A better question would be why the contents of other people's underpants cause folk such as you so much grief.
June 20, 2021 at 02:31
IF they recognise the patterns as telling them truths, they must by that very fact have an independent way of verifying the truth of the markings. Hen...
June 20, 2021 at 02:28
But does your little monkey brain enable you to understand what is possible and what is not? A contradiction is a problem with grammar, not with how t...
June 20, 2021 at 02:25
Well, you might agree that at least you and I are building a thread. Perhaps even a conversation? An argument? And these things we might be doing have...
June 20, 2021 at 02:17
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
A pretty ordinary response. Do many "regular guys" in your vicinity put their father on trial for murder? No, @"Fooloso4" has the point; your criticis...
June 20, 2021 at 02:11
We could continue your little game of posts-last-wins, if you like.
June 20, 2021 at 00:57
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
Yeah, you seem to be playing games. No, if I ask you if you think Euthyphro wise, it depends on what you mean by "wise"; which you are free to explain...
June 20, 2021 at 00:51
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
Why are you avoiding answering the question? Was Euthyphro wise? You implied that he might be. I'd like to understand how. Well, no.
June 20, 2021 at 00:35
Charged of psychologism contrast with charges of behaviourism. He can't consistently do both; and I think we ought grant him the benefit of the doubt ...
June 20, 2021 at 00:32
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
I'm asking what you think - not Gerson, Rabinowitz and many others. Do you think him wise? For my part, he is a buffoon, a clown, a puppet made to dan...
June 20, 2021 at 00:21
Oh, indeed. And the figure is wrong. Describing it in more detail doesn't help. Nothing - no thing - has been moved from one mind to another. Rather w...
June 20, 2021 at 00:15
In: Euthyphro  — view comment
Odd. So after reading the dialogue, do you think Euthyphro wise?
June 19, 2021 at 23:45
But the image is of a state of mind being moved form one head to another. And as soon as you say it you know its wrong.
June 19, 2021 at 23:17
So the thread would be just for me? How thoughtful. Indeed.
June 19, 2021 at 23:07
What? SO this had no real content? You've nothing?
June 19, 2021 at 23:04
Well, not most enjoy. But it's right up there.
June 19, 2021 at 23:02
yep. Just start a new thread. If you build it, they will come. But only if what you say is worthwhile.
June 19, 2021 at 22:59
It was inevitable, it seems, that this thread eventually fell to the base level of poorly done quantum mechanics - 'woo" seems to be the going term fo...
June 19, 2021 at 22:54
There's so much here that is questionable. What sort of thing is a state of mind? We use the term, say, when someone is furious or inconsolable; "they...
June 19, 2021 at 22:51