You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Isn't that what we call "corruption"?
February 23, 2023 at 00:48
So you want to say something like that the source of the concept "the rock is hard" is not a predication but an identity? That seems to me to be just ...
February 22, 2023 at 23:08
Ok. So what is "identical"? Aristotelian logic failed to clearly differentiate "=", ? " and the "is" of predication. Returning to those ambiguities is...
February 22, 2023 at 22:33
That doesn't seem to help. "the rock is hard" sure looks like a predication, despite your protests to the contrary. The upshot is that your reversion ...
February 22, 2023 at 22:26
Thanks. There's very little difference across the filters. Even Continental Europe scores 75% realist, 7% idealist.
February 22, 2023 at 21:58
Damn filters. 76.37% for all regions and all respondents, "endorsed this answer exclusively (excluding multiple-answer endorsements)" 77.92% chose rea...
February 22, 2023 at 21:33
...hence meaning is not a discrete, individual entity passed from speaker to hearer.
February 22, 2023 at 21:30
In the PhilPapers survey, one might choose more than one option. That was not possible with the Forum survey tool. Setting the filters to all response...
February 22, 2023 at 21:23
Yep. It's too early to claim that the "Standard Model" fails. In addition, going back to Aristotle doesn't look much like a way forward. "The rock is ...
February 22, 2023 at 21:11
Not at all. The issue here is the difference in frequency of certain esoteric metaphysical views in the population of this forum compared to other com...
February 22, 2023 at 19:59
IT was apparently , being the contrarian's contrarian.
February 22, 2023 at 06:00
Is it necessary to point out that what is legal and what is ethical are two quite different things?
February 22, 2023 at 04:46
As I agreed, it is not enough for a statistical analysis. There are some differences I find interesting, though. Again, it gives some perspective to t...
February 22, 2023 at 04:15
:grin: Thank you.
February 22, 2023 at 03:18
Ok, but I'm not sure what we might conclude from that. Again, this thread was simply to reinforce the point that the forums are not representative of ...
February 22, 2023 at 03:09
Keep the aspidistra flying. Why? The longitudinal results are there, too, for the PhilPapers survey, showing a tiny swing since 2009 away from idealis...
February 22, 2023 at 02:46
Interesting that folk seem to feel the need to address themselves to me, personally, rather than the topic at hand.
February 22, 2023 at 02:20
The argument you presented for your existing cannot be utterly private without losing all meaning. Membership of a community is implied by your use of...
February 22, 2023 at 02:19
The ethical issue isn't so much to do with the consequence, as with the act of breaching the social convention of property. The community in which a h...
February 22, 2023 at 02:15
Doubtless. And it is apparent that my prejudices are not as uncommon as it might seem, were one the think of the folk hereabouts as "normal". Very dro...
February 22, 2023 at 02:06
Twenty four responses. That might be enough to make some observations. The obvious one is that the number of folk advocating realism is half that of t...
February 22, 2023 at 01:26
Hostage takers demand ransom in exchange for release of Australian professor kidnapped in PNG
February 21, 2023 at 06:29
Then I am content.
February 21, 2023 at 06:06
My preference; https://www.africanmiddleeasternvariety.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/DONE-Dark-Roast-Negrita-The-Original-Middle-Eastern-Style-Cof...
February 21, 2023 at 05:59
I'm perfecting the art of denigrating them obliquely.
February 21, 2023 at 05:31
Your first problem would be finding secondary sources. The best thing about TPF is, nobody cares. We have brought forth wind, and that the offspring o...
February 21, 2023 at 04:58
Good luck with meeting the notability criteria. Rude. I'd never mistake you for a philosopher. - i've read some of your posts.
February 21, 2023 at 04:36
AN article relevant to this topic in Philosophy Now: One Logic, Or Many?
February 21, 2023 at 04:31
Oh, sure. It's just that if you take as your criteria for a thing's existing that it's listed in wikipedia, and if this forum is not listed on wikiped...
February 21, 2023 at 03:39
Yep. ...cis white hetro middle class males... Mark apparently can't see the joke.
February 21, 2023 at 03:04
I gather it's like the Trinity. Not anything to do with number.
February 21, 2023 at 01:48
There's a problem there...
February 21, 2023 at 00:48
Cheers. :grimace:
February 19, 2023 at 23:13
You've made a pretty puzzle for yourself. Seems you can't tell that this post from me is a post from me - just by seeing this post, "one cannot know, ...
February 19, 2023 at 22:34
When they stop doing philosophy and pick up the pruning saw, things are presumably different. They have no trouble with only being to cut a branch ind...
February 19, 2023 at 22:15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APZEhv-3xDw
February 19, 2023 at 04:16
The varieties of bad Stoicism
February 19, 2023 at 04:05
Oh, that's good. Should save plenty of paper, then.
February 19, 2023 at 01:54
Only one?
February 19, 2023 at 01:25
I'll try one more time to show how this is a mischaracterisation of realism. Realism holds that the sentence "the tree has leaves" is about the tree, ...
February 19, 2023 at 01:24
We've discussed previously how I share a disquiet with much of the scientism assumed in analytic philosophy. But we part ways in that, if I've underst...
February 19, 2023 at 01:12
Fair enough. For my part I could apply the first few sentences of the Searle article to myself. That's mighty unfair on the likes of Midgley, Anscombe...
February 19, 2023 at 00:48
There's the misrepresentation of realism again. Yep. The pretence is that our only choice is between a direct realism that does not recognise a causal...
February 19, 2023 at 00:38
I'll take your word for it.
February 19, 2023 at 00:25
Yours is pretty ordinary at the moment.
February 18, 2023 at 23:12
The point is methodological. The view of and is oddly passive. This becomes very clear when one starts to talk about our interactions with the things ...
February 18, 2023 at 23:09
This:
February 18, 2023 at 22:55
:wink: Presumably I can only prune the light from the tree and not the tree-in-itself...?
February 18, 2023 at 22:44
It's not @"NOS4A2" who has the fundamental misunderstanding.
February 18, 2023 at 22:43
"Only"? No, we see the tree. We see the tree as a result of the reflected light, sure. But we do not see the reflected light. Your statement was wrong...
February 18, 2023 at 22:42