You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

:100: :up: :up: :up: @"Wayfarer"
December 26, 2025 at 16:47
:100: :smirk:
December 26, 2025 at 02:22
:up: :up: Yes, and therefore disembodied ("immaterial") consciousness doesn't make any sense – is just wishful / magical thinking. It means 'the map(m...
December 25, 2025 at 22:23
:100: Yes ... Merry Xmas.
December 25, 2025 at 12:07
'Tis the season ... https://youtu.be/c33cW44EVc4?si=QkZfa_Za6YJiIPws "Within You Without You" (5:05) Sergeant Pepper's ..., 1967 writer George Harriso...
December 24, 2025 at 00:21
"You are not a drop in the ocean; you are the entire ocean in a drop." ~Rumi :roll: Advaita vedanta contemplates nonduality (atman = brahman). Spinoza...
December 23, 2025 at 18:24
:roll: :rofl:
December 23, 2025 at 17:00
:up: :up: An emotional – arbitrary – "justification" for e.g. betrayal or cruelty or rape. Lazy. :mask:
December 22, 2025 at 14:37
:up: Your appeal to popularity here seems quite lazy. Given that everyone is (all sentient creatures are) vulnerable to "harming" (i.e. involuntary pa...
December 22, 2025 at 01:40
Amen! :fire:
December 20, 2025 at 01:14
:100: :100: Amen!
December 20, 2025 at 01:09
:eyes: Incorrigibly wrong as always.
December 19, 2025 at 21:06
https://youtu.be/zpngjPNXnAM?si=gNdiDG1F9_unx2Iy "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that." :nerd: (2022) https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussio...
December 19, 2025 at 03:30
So you didn't read (or understand) the articles on self-organizing machines I provided in my previous post ...
December 18, 2025 at 22:18
:up: So in what sense is your "moral thinking" moral?
December 18, 2025 at 21:18
:up: :up: Really? :chin: Consider these articles: https://wyss.harvard.edu/news/a-self-organizing-thousand-robot-swarm/ https://direct.mit.edu/books/m...
December 18, 2025 at 12:31
False. I've neither claimed nor implied such nonsense. No, that's sophistry¹ (e.g. "enformer"-woo-of-the-gaps) from sophos ("wisdom"). Rather philosop...
December 17, 2025 at 23:06
This is not a position I hold or have ever proposed; I agree that any form of innatism "is not tenable". My response to @"Tom Storm"'s OP is found her...
December 17, 2025 at 21:18
... logic, mathematics, computation are mind-independent – subject/pov/language/gauge-invariant – algorithmic constraints on nature (i.e. the intellig...
December 16, 2025 at 17:51
:mask: E.g. a "transwoman" (typical XY) is a gender dysmorphic, modified (mutilated) adult male in drag and not a woman (typical XX). Afaik, "she" is ...
December 16, 2025 at 00:30
:up:
December 15, 2025 at 23:57
:roll: ... which is, in fact, science and not philosoohy.
December 15, 2025 at 20:01
False. Bivalence, or law of the excluded middle, is an axiom of classical logic (indispensable for determining many formal and informal fallacies) as ...
December 15, 2025 at 00:44
"To know" is a cognitive function of "a living body" which all evidence suggests one is (nondualism ~Spinoza, Epicurus) and not "in"(side of) like a s...
December 14, 2025 at 01:05
How does "quantum physics" – the most precise description of 'matter' (i.e. physicality / nature) – do this? Well, the aspects of "reality" which are ...
December 13, 2025 at 18:32
:100: :up: Me too.
December 13, 2025 at 18:01
Having an affinity for "modern Aristotleanism" (e.g. hylomorphism), as you have said you do, Wayf, I'm sure, for consistency's sake, you agree with th...
December 13, 2025 at 12:43
:razz: :up:
December 12, 2025 at 23:37
:100: :100:
December 12, 2025 at 20:12
:up: :up:
December 12, 2025 at 18:21
:smirk: :sparkle:
December 12, 2025 at 18:16
Yes, that's the gist. .
December 12, 2025 at 07:43
Exactly. .
December 12, 2025 at 01:07
Do you believe that "materialism" entails "nihilism" or vice verse? If not, why group them together? :up: :up: As a moral naturalist: insofar as needl...
December 11, 2025 at 21:18
:cool:
December 11, 2025 at 00:47
Apologies if I've given the impression of "substance dualism" in mentions of Spinoza. In the Ethics he adamantly opposes "substance dualism" (such as ...
December 10, 2025 at 22:37
Gracias, homie. :cool: I've listened to several, including his most acclaimed records: "That Nigger's Crazy" "...Is It Something I said?" "Bicentennia...
December 10, 2025 at 22:24
Well, you had claimed "atheism opposes spirituality" and the examples I've provided show that your claim is not true. I also don't see what quantum ph...
December 10, 2025 at 02:04
. So what do you make of The Little Book of Atheist Spirituality by André Comte-Sponville or nontheistic religions such as Advaita Vedantism, Jainism,...
December 09, 2025 at 04:19
Resist every temptation to not think.
December 09, 2025 at 04:08
The original sin: creating a being self-aware of having been created ... https://youtu.be/HU70rxvJFRE?si=03u5vQ97KO168Aka
December 09, 2025 at 03:58
No. "Sapience" seems quite rare (i.e. an evolutionary fluke), probably much more so than it is on Earth, if only because it is a feature of life that ...
December 08, 2025 at 22:27
My "Fermi Paradox" (why I think we are not alone) speculations from a 2019 thread ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/380306 :nerd:
December 08, 2025 at 19:09
... just because you can doesn't mean you should ... :vomit: https://youtu.be/Nge12IFdqjM?si=aTgSNq2o3gk7_V2y "Free As A Bird, 1968" AI version (wtf) ...
December 07, 2025 at 22:07
Addendum to https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/1024764 https://youtu.be/wi_DoCC1XC4?si=V0tZup_58Ze3fhoO Welcome to Zarathustra's 'Motle...
December 07, 2025 at 20:22
https://youtu.be/J36z7AnhvOM?si=TnzmXc5Pm8q208Px "Can Take My Eyes Off You" (3:34) A-side single, 1967 writers B. Crewe & B. Gaudio performer Frankie ...
December 07, 2025 at 02:52
:fire: (Ammonius Saccas / Plotinus ... 3rd century CE)
December 06, 2025 at 17:44
By which you mean exactly what? (I ask because you've unjustifably opposed 'mind-independence' (ontology) which you've conflating with a caricature of...
December 03, 2025 at 18:27
:100: :up: ... and as if 'mind' itself is not physical (i.e. not a mind-independent property). .
December 03, 2025 at 01:18
Well, I was responding to this ...
December 01, 2025 at 20:37