You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

:up: That depends on what "they" meant by "material".
June 09, 2022 at 04:04
I still prefer Tristan Tzara's playful dada to vaporous "deconstuctionism". More a radical relativist than (philosophical) "skeptic", Derrida's 'rheto...
June 09, 2022 at 03:53
Apophatic clarity.
June 08, 2022 at 19:23
:smirk: :up: :zip: :fire: Cite an example. :chin: "Testable" in what way/s?
June 08, 2022 at 19:06
Without question. :smirk: A question is an expression that consists of a variable? :eyes:
June 08, 2022 at 18:45
June 08, 2022 at 06:47
Evolutionary processes (e.g. chrysalis) are prodigeously wasteful – entropic. We're either fit enough to survive 'becoming an extraterrestrial species...
June 08, 2022 at 06:22
What do you mean by "worldview" in contrast to (a) metaphysics?
June 08, 2022 at 00:46
Leucippus (contra Parmenides et al) millennia before Hegel: "there is only atoms swirling in the void". And donut holes.
June 07, 2022 at 22:53
:up:
June 07, 2022 at 22:28
:smirk: :up: My point exactly. You stand corrected, sir. Again. :wink:
June 07, 2022 at 01:42
Surely; however, my point is that cognitive / psychological biases (e.g. procreative – survival – instincts) are biological facts, not "assumptions", ...
June 07, 2022 at 01:40
No metaphysics (archai) before Plato? But "Platonism" developed out of – in response to – Thales, Anaximander, Pythagorus, Permenides, Heraclitus, Dem...
June 07, 2022 at 00:57
Ditto. :up:
June 07, 2022 at 00:35
:groan: No. No. Categorical reasoning is hypothetical reasoning? :sweat:
June 06, 2022 at 20:26
Well, they're all variations on so there's no need to address any but this (re-quoted) representative example.
June 06, 2022 at 20:11
Okay "scientific" as you're using the term corresponds to what I call 'pre-modern theoria' (i.e. contemplativa). Still, Moliere, this is literary – no...
June 06, 2022 at 20:06
Are you suggesting that 'Kant's philosophy' is "scientific"? Which do you mean – pre-modern theoria or modern hypothetico-deduction? "Scientific" in a...
June 06, 2022 at 18:11
:nerd: :up:
June 06, 2022 at 17:55
https://youtu.be/aBQIAWh3YBs "Glass Onion" (2:18) The Beatles, 1968 writers, Lennon-McCartney performers, The Beatles
June 06, 2022 at 15:39
:up:
June 06, 2022 at 14:33
That's an observation about folk psychology (i.e. cognitive bias), not about a reasoned 'ethical position' or 'existential commitment'.
June 06, 2022 at 14:30
Thanks for the link. Here's a reminder (to myself to bug the Moderators) https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/641059
June 06, 2022 at 14:12
Where did you get this from? In other words, natural scientists (as opposed to "fringe" pseudo-scientists) working on fundamental physics, thermodynam...
June 06, 2022 at 14:05
... the more virus-like it is.
June 06, 2022 at 07:36
Generically, a question is an expression that consists of a variable.
June 06, 2022 at 04:27
This "question" makes no sense.
June 06, 2022 at 04:19
De nada, señor. :wink:
June 06, 2022 at 02:48
It seems to me, Derrida (ironically?) calls his own texts (with all others) into question first and foremost ... like, for instance, a version of the ...
June 06, 2022 at 02:45
Well, that's the wrong question, right? And a scientific (explanatory) problem, in fact, not a philosophical (descriptive, interpretive) question? :ch...
June 06, 2022 at 02:38
I advocate intellectual and moral courage (i.e. ataraxia, ekstasis, non serviam, carpe diem, sapere aude, ...) Whether or not this makes me a 'fatalis...
June 06, 2022 at 02:19
As fsr as I know, most physicalist philosophers and cognitive neuroscientists take the position that there is not – never has been – a "hard problem",...
June 06, 2022 at 00:08
:sweat: :up:
June 05, 2022 at 23:59
Decadent tripe. Nothing is "justified", existence doesn't require "justification" (e.g. Zapffe, Camus, Cioran, Rosset) – being here now is gratuitous....
June 05, 2022 at 22:59
In: Pantheism  — view comment
:rofl:
June 05, 2022 at 22:54
"We suffer, therefore I am." (A Levinasian moment.) This is inconsistent with my understanding and life experience, Smith. Suffering entails solicitud...
June 05, 2022 at 22:51
In: Pantheism  — view comment
I fail to see a non-trivial (woo-free) difference between "Enformationism" and the synopsis of "digitalism" featured in this 2002 Wired magazine artic...
June 05, 2022 at 21:52
More precisely, IME: Epistemology concerns criteria for deciding how to formulate theoretical models and perform experiments which test theoretical mo...
June 05, 2022 at 21:06
"It may have been".
June 05, 2022 at 20:40
Futilitarianism, Neil Vallelly :up: Not evident, however, to incorrigible "beginners"...
June 05, 2022 at 15:55
I don't think metaphysics is theoretical or contributes to the content of natural science; thus, I think, it only reflects on ("the nature" of) theore...
June 05, 2022 at 15:44
Suffering is not a "problem" – hard or easy – to be "solved" but a reality (i.e. our facticity) to which, to degrees, we are adapted / maladapted (acc...
June 05, 2022 at 15:35
¡Si! :point:
June 05, 2022 at 15:07
My proposal isn't just "neti neti" ... Take the red pill, mi amigo, and see how deep the rabbit holes – my links – go. :cool:
June 05, 2022 at 14:54
I've tried to – I think we must – with this approach (last paragraph) :point: .
June 05, 2022 at 12:19
:chin: (These embedded links are questions, no?)
June 05, 2022 at 12:13
That's epistemology and logic to me. IME, Smith, 'knowledge-ignorance' occurs before 'reflections on knowledge-ignorance' (i.e. the latter only clarif...
June 05, 2022 at 12:00
As an antitheist, I'm only agnostic about (nontheistic) pandeism & acosmism
June 05, 2022 at 11:42