You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Virgo Avalytikh

['Member']Joined: July 26, 2019 at 21:03Last active: May 17, 2025 at 12:343 discussions175 comments

Discussions (3)

Comments

ew
November 03, 2020 at 13:02
'Male' and 'female' are genetic classifications, determined (in humans) by the presence or absence of the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome is the male-m...
February 07, 2020 at 19:39
A frequent defence of the State's legitimacy is that its legitimacy derives from the consent of the governed. There are a number of problems with such...
February 01, 2020 at 15:28
Governments, in essence, are tax farms, which claim for themselves the unique prerogative to initiate force and invade private property, and use their...
February 01, 2020 at 11:12
The university standard text is Jonathan Wolff, An Introduction to Political Philosophy. It is a good starting point, though not nearly as comprehensi...
January 31, 2020 at 13:50
Alright, well have fun doing whatever this is you're doing.
January 30, 2020 at 16:42
Why are you making your objections here? If you want to debate the principles of libertarianism, do it in a libertarianism thread. I am happy to respo...
January 30, 2020 at 14:03
I don't understand what you are trying to say. Are you suggesting that I am incapable of responding to the latest objections which my thread's dialogu...
January 30, 2020 at 13:08
fdrake and I have exchanged many thousands of words, and we both think that it is has been quite productive so far. The suggestion that I have 'walked...
January 30, 2020 at 11:41
I am not sure what this is referring to. I have defended libertarianism at length and in depth elsewhere. I have also challenged and rebutted the sugg...
January 30, 2020 at 11:05
I am by no means the first person to point this out, but the 'left-right' divide is not fit for purpose, for all sorts of reasons. That is not to say ...
January 30, 2020 at 10:03
How on earth do you get from here to here ? For one thing, there is no such thing as abolishing 'inheritance'. The only in way in which inheritance wo...
January 29, 2020 at 18:58
Codex Quaerentis is what you want, then.
January 27, 2020 at 20:08
Or maybe quaerentis.
January 27, 2020 at 20:05
Codex Quarendae - just looks a little pretentious to me. The subtitle is good though. Also, I don't believe this is grammatical, since codex is mascul...
January 27, 2020 at 20:02
The title looks a bit pretentious.
January 27, 2020 at 19:50
Because in 'hypothesis' the accent is on the second syllable, but in 'hyphen' the accent is on the first. At least the way I pronounce them.
January 25, 2020 at 22:07
https://images.ladbible.com/thumbnail?type=webp&url=http://beta.ems.ladbiblegroup.com/s3/content/7d0a20905d8edc4c08a222496d12eec5.png&quality=70&width...
January 25, 2020 at 11:31
I don't understand the question.
January 25, 2020 at 10:24
Presumably, it would mean that you don't use 'an' with one-syllable words, like 'house'.
January 24, 2020 at 18:58
The way I learned it, when I was leaning English, is that 'an' is correct, in British English, before a word beginning with 'h', if the accent lies on...
January 24, 2020 at 10:57
One of the problems we are having here is the fact that you are making unwarranted assumptions, and taking for granted that for which you have not off...
January 23, 2020 at 16:25
This is not true. In my original post, I cited an article of David Friedman’s, ‘A Positive Account of Property Rights’, in which he argues – convincin...
January 22, 2020 at 17:32
I have to confess some disappointment with how little you have engaged with the argument I presented. I have denied precisely the identification which...
January 22, 2020 at 11:09
https://i.imgur.com/bF9bhxc.png
January 20, 2020 at 22:28
On the understanding that that which is expropriated by taxation is the rightful property of her who is taxed, taxation would indeed be coercive, for ...
January 20, 2020 at 19:36
The main problem is that you are hypostatising or reifying the free market, as though it were presented as a kind of subsistent ‘thing’. But it does n...
January 20, 2020 at 13:45
Well, it's a shame. I thought we were having a good discussion.
January 19, 2020 at 19:15
Should I take it that we're not using arguments anymore? Is that what this is?
January 19, 2020 at 19:06
It's not inevitable. Nuclear States might eliminate the human race before it happens. It is 'natural', in the sense that there is a tendency for poore...
January 19, 2020 at 18:28
There is no need to 'start over'. When you successfully repel a thief from your home, or incapacitate a mugger, you needn't step back and ask yourself...
January 19, 2020 at 18:15
You haven't understood the point I was making. My point is that the source of (at least this particular kind of) inequality is the State itself. 'Down...
January 19, 2020 at 18:02
Ancap = anarcho-capitalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism Should I be taking this as a threat?
January 19, 2020 at 17:58
Society is not the State. States, as coercive institutions, are precisely anti-social in their working. The fact is, those whom you identify as 'downt...
January 19, 2020 at 17:50
This is not to engage at all with the argument which I have presented, but simply to ignore it. The assumptions you make in this argument are precisel...
January 19, 2020 at 17:37
Where I come from, arguments are considered the stuff of philosophy.
January 19, 2020 at 16:43
I think we are talking past each other. This was my initial statement with which you took issue: we must never fall into the trap of thinking that 'St...
January 19, 2020 at 16:15
What
January 19, 2020 at 15:15
Yes.
January 19, 2020 at 14:54
What's funny is that Christians and atheists would both answer 'No'.
January 19, 2020 at 14:46
The distinction I have made is simply that between human activity which involves the initiation of force and the invasion of private property, and tha...
January 19, 2020 at 14:22
Just write like a human being. English is not my first language, and I'm not going to take the time to read something that's purposefully obscure. But...
January 19, 2020 at 12:09
Do you do any philosophy here, or do you just say things like this?
January 19, 2020 at 11:18
This is not correct. A State is a particular kind of human association, one which holds a monopoly on physical force over a given territory. It is not...
January 19, 2020 at 11:17
I have defined ‘State’ in a way that is quite conventional in political theory. There are alternative definitions, but they don’t alter my analysis in...
January 19, 2020 at 11:13
Currency certainly would not function as it does now, in the world of central banks, fiat currencies and periodic financial crises. But this does not ...
January 19, 2020 at 11:07