You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Thorongil

Comments

Expand on this statement.
June 19, 2016 at 02:40
Ah, good to hear.
June 19, 2016 at 02:40
My claims are gibberish? I've made no claims to such an effect in the first place. That's my whole point, apparently lost on you. I can't give advice ...
June 19, 2016 at 02:30
You literally just admitted that it didn't.....................
June 19, 2016 at 02:27
The will in its essence (the phrase you used) I took to mean the will in and of itself, which you said doesn't change. I agree that it doesn't change ...
June 19, 2016 at 01:52
The word mind usually connotes the brain functions that give rise to consciousness. To state that it is an illusion would be to state that one is cons...
June 18, 2016 at 23:22
This would be unwarranted.
June 18, 2016 at 23:10
A strange distinction. There is no essence of the will.
June 18, 2016 at 23:07
Yes, representations are not caused by the will, since causality obtains only within the world as representation, even while they are simultaneously i...
June 18, 2016 at 23:06
Being convinced that life is neither worth continuing nor worth ending, you will notice, practically results in continuing to live. It would be the sa...
June 18, 2016 at 23:02
June 18, 2016 at 22:53
It probably was good advice. My lack of knowledge about European cars would have disabled me from giving it, just as it disables me from giving it abo...
June 18, 2016 at 22:52
The one to which I originally responded. :|
June 18, 2016 at 22:43
It sounds like you've now answered your own query to me.
June 18, 2016 at 22:38
Apologies, but there is no advice to give, for there is no duty to live nor one to die that the young person could fulfill.
June 18, 2016 at 22:33
A simple answer: it doesn't (change, evolve, etc)
June 18, 2016 at 22:20
Representation is not atemporal, though.
June 18, 2016 at 22:17
I still see a "should," so you haven't gotten rid of what I object to.
June 18, 2016 at 22:15
Life has no moral worth period, so the question is incoherent and unanswerable.
June 18, 2016 at 22:08
I seem to recall seeing surveys done of professional philosophers that showed that most of them are moral realists, or at least a majority of them are...
June 18, 2016 at 12:41
A thoroughly unhelpful and patronizing post. You should do me a favor and not post like that again.
June 14, 2016 at 23:18
Who does this? If there are such people making such absurd sweeping generalizations, then they are ignored and small in number, as one ought to expect...
May 10, 2016 at 18:47
I'm coming into this a bit late, but the OP reminded me of something I thought I'd share about the topic referenced in the quote by Schopenhauer. Here...
May 09, 2016 at 21:45
Yeah meng.
May 09, 2016 at 20:27
What a social Darwinian crock. And sometimes, the "other" is exactly all three of these things. Race doesn't exist as a biological concept, so they we...
May 09, 2016 at 16:04
Not the best translation though.
May 09, 2016 at 01:46
Who were they?
April 27, 2016 at 00:54
I've always been acquainted with the Latin phrase "Tanta stultitia mortalium est," but forgot Shakespeare used it too.
April 27, 2016 at 00:52
In: Genius  — view comment
I'll take 5 of each. Keep the change.
April 27, 2016 at 00:50
Alternatively, you could petition him to sign it in order to hasten the cannibalistic self-destruction of modern capitalism, thus in turn hastening th...
April 27, 2016 at 00:49
I'll take that as a no.
April 24, 2016 at 00:24
See my about page.
April 23, 2016 at 21:07
And a totally unremarkable red herring uttered by you. Here's an easy yes or no question: Do you or do you not still stand by your original argument? ...
April 23, 2016 at 20:08
So as of now, you still haven't argued that AN is false, nor that having children is justifiable. Well done.
April 23, 2016 at 14:52
Whoop-de-fucking-do. This isn't an argument about anything.
April 23, 2016 at 03:20
They should be granted temporary asylum, provided "they" are actually refugees. The problem no one likes to talk about is that well more than half of ...
April 19, 2016 at 14:20
The title of your thread and the wording of your poll are not quite the same. I would agree that one has the right to have sex, but I would not agree ...
April 19, 2016 at 14:11
Is this like Kant's distinction between the empirical and intelligible self?
April 19, 2016 at 14:08
Okay, sure. It's a reason, but it's still not a good one or a moral one.
April 19, 2016 at 14:07
I'm not familiar with such a distinction, or at least with how you have worded it.
April 18, 2016 at 00:16
Touche. It is the individualized self that is dissolved when being compassionate. ;)
April 17, 2016 at 18:33
If one has the opportunity to survive without eating meat, there is no reason, moral or otherwise, to eat it.
April 17, 2016 at 18:11
True, I am more drawn to mystical apotheosis than I am to scientific inquiry, though I do not wish to denigrate the latter. :P I added a couple other ...
April 17, 2016 at 18:09
I voted for Plato. One perhaps unconscious reason for siding with him is that he has much more of an effect on me due to the quality of his writing. A...
April 17, 2016 at 17:50
You said: "Being non-existent, strictly speaking, they don't get a say in the matter, nor are they entitled to one, nor are they missing out or being ...
April 17, 2016 at 17:39
A most salient admission. I'll take it as proof that my objection to you was correct after all.
April 13, 2016 at 16:48
I think you answer your own question here.
April 11, 2016 at 14:25
Excellent post. However, I think at least in moral matters, human beings have always ever been fallen, for we now know that there never was an idyllic...
April 11, 2016 at 14:19
The labels "liberal" and "conservative" are almost meaningless. Using your own labels as an example, being opposed to the death penalty and in favor o...
April 10, 2016 at 18:37
The very definition thereof.
April 03, 2016 at 16:31