You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

bongo fury

Comments

No worries.
March 25, 2021 at 22:36
Haha. No? Not a plausible reading of "the whole of math"?
March 25, 2021 at 22:18
Sure. I was assuming that by "the whole of math" Boolos meant simply the maximal (consistent) extension or union of all the systems you mention. There...
March 25, 2021 at 21:57
How?
March 25, 2021 at 21:01
Cool, although it didn't matter what he meant, so long as it was bigger than e.g. Robinson arithmetic, was my point.
March 25, 2021 at 15:28
Isn't he just ensuring that what 2 + 2 is equal to is being discussed with respect to a system big enough for the second theorem to apply? https://en....
March 25, 2021 at 10:37
No. Sorry. At (5) and (6), yes. But you have undertaken to follow the copious and kind advice of @"TonesInDeepFreeze", so you may be pleasantly surpri...
March 24, 2021 at 22:07
Godel's second incompleteness theorem explained in words of one syllable
March 24, 2021 at 16:43
And isn't that, in a very real sense, what we find when we look for the holy spirit of our lord Jesus Christ? Please turn now to Psalm 56 in your hymn...
March 24, 2021 at 15:56
I mean I doubt if there isn't a lack of inclination. Not that the inclination is a thing, haha. ... You did mean an inclination to avoid/reduce?
March 23, 2021 at 18:23
Amen to that. Sadly not...
March 23, 2021 at 18:08
In: Dreaming  — view comment
Dreaming is thinking about the real world, just off-line and hence fundamentally confused about physics (the walking in the air). On-line thought is f...
March 23, 2021 at 00:51
Well that makes everything perfectly clear.
March 21, 2021 at 16:08
Well this inspires me to actually getting around to browsing empirical research, rather than simply saying, in this case: doesn't everyone experience ...
March 21, 2021 at 14:18
Didn't Russell rather skewer that approach? (On Denoting.) Speaking literally, yes. This needs clarifying. Produces strings of alphabetic characters? ...
March 21, 2021 at 10:27
No, the premise I'm deciding to explicitly deny is that we have things called minds, except in a manner of speaking about our physical constitution an...
March 20, 2021 at 23:52
No, I said I suspect your argument is valid. It's about beliefs facing the tribunal of experience as a corpus. That's why I might be just as inclined ...
March 20, 2021 at 23:12
An animal.
March 20, 2021 at 22:50
The idea that we each have a mind, except in a manner of speaking about our physical constitution and behaviour. Partly because I suspect that argumen...
March 20, 2021 at 22:43
You have as a premise that we each have a "mind" (or "mental events"). Can you imagine a rational animal being like a robot in lacking a such a gift?
March 20, 2021 at 16:03
... An all-too-rarely credited nominalist insight, rather.
March 20, 2021 at 15:10
If only. Unfortunately they mostly can't resist taunting believers with a more subtle dance, wherein the beetle is supposed irrelevant, but not doubte...
March 19, 2021 at 12:43
With pattern-making?
March 18, 2021 at 15:34
Yep.
March 18, 2021 at 15:18
Sure it does, to the extent they do, which is grossly overstated. It's because they have been used successfully to express sadness. Path dependence. C...
March 18, 2021 at 13:52
Goodman explains "expression" as the metaphorical exemplification of properties. The chord expresses sadness in that it is a sample of metaphorically-...
March 18, 2021 at 13:37
That's the other thread, though.
March 18, 2021 at 13:10
For me too. And it was Goodman's actual point here: I might (later) edit in the continuation that explains how emotional analysis of music should lead...
March 18, 2021 at 11:29
https://books.google.com/books/about/Science_Without_Numbers.html?id=Exc1DQAAQBAJ
March 18, 2021 at 11:03
Haha, but is it disappointing that the connection isn't natural? I would be expecting to be accused of wishful thinking on this question. (Of denying ...
March 18, 2021 at 08:58
Happy to dismiss the relevance of any non-artistic/intellectual pleasures to aesthetic analysis or ethical analysis/design. (And preferring to analyse...
March 18, 2021 at 08:48
Prefer the other way around. ("Cognitivism"? Not that the label matters.)
March 18, 2021 at 08:16
Convention, complicated by path-dependent exploration of the infinite possibilities. Creating the illusion of a natural connection. Yuk, I know. Somet...
March 18, 2021 at 08:10
I'm finding this unineligible.
March 15, 2021 at 17:55
Ah, solving that question Brings the priest and the doctor In their long coats Running over the fields
March 15, 2021 at 08:53
In a frivolous mood I pasted the first 1000-odd words of B&T and PI into prowritingaid.com and learnt that the former has a readability grade of 13, a...
March 13, 2021 at 21:24
Well obviously it's a puzzle if we accept also the premise that calling a single grain a heap is absurd. If calling it a heap is tolerable then, as I ...
March 13, 2021 at 13:29
Sure, but does the distribution of personal thresholds of heap-recognition, and hence usage of "heap", extend all the way back to a single grain? If s...
March 13, 2021 at 11:01
Day 112. Ok so I guess I have entry level absolute pitch: I can now calibrate musical 'calculations' with respect to a core of mental images (mainly, ...
March 12, 2021 at 23:24
Yes, that is the problem. So... the answer to this question... ... would be? 5 million grains, say... isn't a heap, in your logical representation? No...
March 12, 2021 at 13:28
So... isn't a heap? Agreed. But what is the smallest number of grains that would need considering by speakers as a particular case? Is it 1?
March 12, 2021 at 11:47
A complete impasse, or a minimal impasse? :grin:
March 12, 2021 at 11:28
March 12, 2021 at 11:21
So you've pumped the required intuition, and a single grain is no longer merely the smallest heap?
March 12, 2021 at 11:18
Sure. Heap is a spectrum. No puzzle. A single grain is a minimal heap. A completely bald man is minimally hairy. Black is minimally white. The puzzle ...
March 12, 2021 at 11:09
So, 1?
March 12, 2021 at 10:52
Yes, but how many?
March 12, 2021 at 10:48
... leading to the conclusion (incompatible with a premise, or there's no puzzle) that a single grain is a heap. Does that happen also with your "infi...
March 12, 2021 at 10:34
Yeah, the objects are identical, not the names. Typo?
March 06, 2021 at 23:25