You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

The question makes little sense to my mind. Things can only disappear or appear for perceivers. Yes, but for the world to exist it doesn't need to app...
February 16, 2017 at 09:03
I don't personally understand the distinction you're specifying or why I am equivocating - I agree with Willow's response by and large.
February 16, 2017 at 08:50
Except what if there is nothing besides nature as it appears to us? Away with the noumenon/phenomenon distinction. The noumenon doesn't exist in the s...
February 15, 2017 at 22:05
I agree to this. I don't agree to this, and I think this is Spinoza's point with regards to absolute necessity - existence necessarily is creative. I ...
February 15, 2017 at 22:01
>:O >:O >:O >:O What does this mean? Does this mean that if I go in a straight like I will return ultimately to the point I started from? Yes it does....
February 15, 2017 at 20:20
Well I dislike movies and TV completely. I almost never watch. Movies are only fun if you watch them with someone you're close to - then it's like liv...
February 15, 2017 at 20:18
I think video-games for example aren't great (I don't play any myself), but they're preferable to doing a lot of other worse things. So a joke which e...
February 15, 2017 at 20:06
Okay, yeah, I had a look and quick read of that. Anything more? :s
February 15, 2017 at 20:05
Personally I don't think humour should be used in ways that encourages immoral behaviour... but to each his own.
February 15, 2017 at 20:02
Right, and playing video-games is certainly a bigger timewaste and more detrimental than: :-} :-d
February 15, 2017 at 19:59
You realise all these are nothing except useful fictions which we have invented in order to conceptualise our measurements, and create a system which ...
February 15, 2017 at 19:39
:-} http://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/54437#Post_54437
February 15, 2017 at 19:02
To add a bit more about this - I think some thinkers were fundamentally right - maybe not right in the details, but fundamentally right, regardless of...
February 15, 2017 at 18:20
Very strange, I was never warned about your message here at all. First time I see it was now, accidentally while browsing through. I've never said thi...
February 15, 2017 at 18:00
Ah I see, okay Well yes, objectively it doesn't matter. Imagine for a moment you are Bill Gates, you are so rich, you don't need to work for another d...
February 15, 2017 at 09:15
Well see, this is what I don't like about Hegel personally. I don't view history as having a direction - as being a dialectic headed somewhere. It's n...
February 14, 2017 at 22:15
I mean, especially if she has this Mojo... http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/powerpuff/images/c/c9/Mojo_jojo_aparincia2.png You don't really wanna m...
February 14, 2017 at 17:17
Are you purposefully playing dumb? :P I went to page 20 and saw talk about the practices, rituals and traditions of savages there.
February 14, 2017 at 12:29
Well I knew that progressives are actually reactionaries wanting to go back to our days as savages, only that I didn't want to say it ;)
February 14, 2017 at 12:17
So for being an idiot, he gets called a genius? :P Kant wasn't as revolutionary as you and Wayfarer make him sound like, I lean towards TGW here. Of c...
February 14, 2017 at 11:51
>:O Yes, just like Clinton will win by 4-5% points X-)
February 14, 2017 at 11:36
Same. Same. Same. Nope! X-) Yes. Yes! Nope! Guns are good, how else are folks gonna defend themselves? Same. Only that you're not very vocal about it....
February 14, 2017 at 11:35
I'm with him on this: http://i68.tinypic.com/motar.png Life is what you do while you're waiting to die. There's no point in suicide, because you're go...
February 14, 2017 at 11:25
Oh dear... :-O Im not sure I ever want to woo this real woman with a mojo ... Im not quite sure what that is supposed to mean to be quite honest >:O
February 14, 2017 at 07:20
This sounds much like the slave who, when his master decides to free him, cannot bear to be freed, and begs for the chains not to be taken off :P Pers...
February 13, 2017 at 19:57
Fuck it man, what's the reason not to go on living? What's the reason to quit life? Living is your default state. You need a reason to change somethin...
February 13, 2017 at 18:13
Oh my days Thorongil, I consider myself quite a literate person in philosophy, and I have never even heard of those two figures! :-O Thanks for the re...
February 13, 2017 at 16:24
BC's argument is like: you can take all your economic concerns, just give us our sexual concerns >:O
February 13, 2017 at 14:26
lol one of the few times I agree with what you say.
February 13, 2017 at 13:13
Suck it up Wayfarer - it's not about people being scared at all, it's just that some forms of social organisation ain't working. When I want to contro...
February 13, 2017 at 13:06
Yeah I don't agree with the "extra-mental" part, which is extra-rational, simply because it doesn't make much sense to me what that would be or could ...
February 13, 2017 at 08:52
If you work at a research institute, or know someone who does, you can pretty much get free access to any of them :P I agree with the rest of your poi...
February 13, 2017 at 08:45
How can you do that? :s I can never listen to philosophy while I do work - if I do that, then I don't understand anything of it. Is your work in the g...
February 12, 2017 at 22:05
I don't have much time now, but basically a few comments: That's an argumentum ad hominem - not an intellectual reason for disagreeing with Scholastic...
February 12, 2017 at 22:01
>:O you're not the first to tell me that
February 12, 2017 at 21:47
Sure, but you yourself educated me what he meant by that. Shall I remind you by searching for a quote? >:)
February 12, 2017 at 21:46
But philosophical history ended with Hegel, so then Chomsky is irrelevant. Not worth studying, according to Hegel himself. So to study him would indee...
February 12, 2017 at 21:41
No he can't. A Pyrrhonist doesn't doubt in the absence of reason(s). He must have reason for that doubt, the mere logical possibility of it isn't a re...
February 12, 2017 at 21:39
However, I suppose you being the smartass you so often are actually meant that as a way to mock my lack of knowledge with regards to Chomsky and my la...
February 12, 2017 at 21:37
True, but that we cannot even possibly understand how it could be otherwise is an indication that we have no reason to think it could be otherwise. Wh...
February 12, 2017 at 21:34
Well I take it to be a response to: Since that's where I am mentioning swimming, hence the idea of a pond in your response. If so, then what other mea...
February 12, 2017 at 21:31
Well I certainly prefer the smaller pond of reason, than the larger pond of bondage to lust, greed, etc. if that's what you mean :P
February 12, 2017 at 21:29
Yes I agree when you put it like this. By virtue of protecting yourself from inflation - ie participating in the economy - you aren't withdrawing it. ...
February 12, 2017 at 21:27
Yes he would obviously deny it, but he would have to provide additional argument for it. That's what it means when something isn't certain. Kant creat...
February 12, 2017 at 20:16
Can you please provide me with a citation for this? Has René shown that there is an unexperienced synthesis of self and world that occurs prior to exp...
February 12, 2017 at 20:07
Ok so on this view, causality is associated with the intelligibility of the world, not with its possibility - the world could possibly not be intellig...
February 12, 2017 at 20:00
Objects of perception are given in space. Space is a precondition of perception, and therefore cannot itself be perceived. You cannot hold space, touc...
February 12, 2017 at 19:40
Conditions of perception are not themselves perceived - the eye does not see itself. Therefore, you can say that objects of perception are ideal - whi...
February 12, 2017 at 19:10
The point is, whether you like it or not, that Kant's a priority of space, time, causality, etc. was an original stroke of genius, and I'm not a big f...
February 12, 2017 at 18:56
:-} Yes obviously. Nowhere did I claim that. For something perceived to be ideal doesn't require it to be a priori - and space isn't perceived - thing...
February 12, 2017 at 18:55