Jeremiah

You have some aspects right and others wrong. The definition of probability is the frequency of possible outcomes of repeated random events (random in...

All possible odds, if something is not possible or becomes not possible then it is no longer a question of odds. May seem like an obvious point but pe...

Playing poker for one million years means the probability of a given hand approches its true value for all players involved, this removes the influenc...

In that time frame the impact of a winning streak is not significant.

Infinity is a number too large to be measured that means any relative odds are unknown, but they would in theroy approch certainty. Which is problemat...

It is far more likely that you are not aware that you are dreaming and can not recall the dream.

When I am aware that I am dreaming, which is rare, I do not enjoy it.

I found "philosophy" to be too shallow. I mean actual philosophy would be vast and deep, but their are so few actual philosophers left, and they are n...

Then you should fit in around here.

Like most people, you have a horrible understanding of what probability is. Probability is the frequency of possible outcomes. Whether or not that is ...

I always feel good when I help others, maybe you are broken.

If anything human action is always a combination of things rather than moved by a single influence. I think it is a bit dumb to try and reduce it to o...

Human action is a byproduct of several factors, like for example gravity.

"You] want them to be happy. . ." Sounds self serving to me.

So let me get this straight: You found out that you can change your own behavior? Quick someone get this guy a Nobel Prize!

In academic settings if you don't use formal grammar then they don't read your paper, they just throw it in the trash. If you are a student then you'l...

There are people who do not capitalize thier name. If you want to be one just do it: it is not a big deal. If you like get it changed legally to all l...

Relative. I am sure there are a lot of things you miss.

You have yet to show a real contradiction; all you did was babble your misunderstanding of the semantics.

"So, no meds for the delusions?" I don't have delusions anymore, the episodes are triggered by some variable yet to be officially identified. I inheri...

When I got out I dropped all the anxiety and depression medication I was on, they didn't help they just made me feel slightly stoned, and I didn't lik...

I was institutionalized against my will for having paranoid delusional schizophrenia and was diagnosed with severe depression with suicidal ideation. ...

I got the joke I just didn't think it was funny.

It was not Wells Fargo and I can't say which bank on any type of social media. However, if you are implying that the fact he was blind caused him to g...

At my last job working service for small business banking one of my coworkers was blind.

You, as I certainly don't see what you are describing. In the respects of what is natural, I see no difference between my computer screen and the tree...

There is no logical fallacy that I am aware of; however, observation does not prove causation, especially if you expect there are confounding variable...

You can neither prove or disprove unfalsiable claims.

You are tripping up on the semantics. Unconditional is the condition needed to call it unconditional, and not a condition of how that love is expresse...

To do stuff and things so I can do my stuff and things.

Show me one person who does not have some knowledge of something, is not ignorant of something, or is not confused about something. They are worthless...

That is a weak straw-man. I never said they didn't exist, I said several times that they are too broad to be of any use. I said it directly, more than...

I don't care about your categories, I thought I made that abundantly clear. I think they are worthless. Also you have yet to demonstrate any cause/eff...

Well two of your "epistemic states" are really the same thing, and your categories are so broad they are useless, plus you are just making up crap off...

It would also be a challenge to find a person who doesn't fit into all three. I think you need to reconsider your inquiry, it is very ineffective. If ...

I am sorry, but when did you establish this, and the validity of your limited and grossly oversimplified categories?

Already did.

Sorry, but I lost interest.

It does not matter that you are using numbers, it is still an arbitrary ranking with labels. You need to ditch this idea that quantitative = numbers, ...

If all the reasons to end life are emotional and subjective, than what gives them prior over the emotional and subjective reasons to continue living?

When was the last time you or any one measured an infinite quantity?

There is no meaningful measurement there; I can't say the 2nd Batman is 5 meters better than the 3rd Batman, as that would be gibberish. There is no w...

I got this crazy idea, instead of debating the difference between the two here in this thread, how about people get a book from a reliable source and ...

You are not even looking at the variable of interest any more. You are looking at the proportion and not the observation, you can't pull our a ruler a...

Simply because you arbitrarily assigned numbers to groups or the elements in those groups that does not mean the observations themselves are quantitat...

That is not how quantitative works and there can be categorical comparisons. Example: "How I thought that movie was great! What did you think?" "I tho...

Any number can be defined as a categorical (aka qualitative) term, even infinity.

No, it does't, and death is not a "change in life". Life is not changing, life ends. I know that is colloquial semantics, but it implies death is life...

You are either dead or you are alive and you can only experience life. To be honest even saying, "you are dead" is an odd phrase that does not reflect...

Because people are stupid and it causes them to believe stupid things.