You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jeremiah

Comments

I never said you did, but not that you mention it, it is implied when you label them "positive" and "negative", as that implication is inherit in the ...
September 25, 2017 at 15:22
It is still very much black and white, a limited frame that is way too binary. It is also overly simplistic and ridged to be significantly shaped to l...
September 25, 2017 at 14:56
The entire OP is a waste of words.
September 25, 2017 at 14:45
Zero is a number too small to be measured or the absences of.
September 25, 2017 at 14:08
Too black and white.
September 25, 2017 at 14:00
Choice is empirically demonstrable, while hard determinism is an unfalsifiable claim. You are grasping at straws, and looking for an excuse to avoid t...
September 24, 2017 at 16:08
Also, I entirety encourage everyone to learn more math.
September 24, 2017 at 04:01
You are gonna have to drop that thoughtless 50/50 notion.
September 24, 2017 at 03:54
I didn't realize you thought so highly of me, I am flattered.
September 24, 2017 at 03:53
Don't like it when people pick on your imaginary friend?
September 23, 2017 at 21:53
I think someone needs to learn how to read.
September 23, 2017 at 21:45
Why on Earth would it be 50/50?
September 23, 2017 at 14:26
Then we agree, all that stupid nonsense about it being certain is stupid nonsense, since the conditions are always changing.
September 23, 2017 at 14:17
I think the problem is that too many of you think of probability in an linear fashion but it doesn't work like that. Probability is a vast tangled con...
September 23, 2017 at 14:15
I saw what you said but I said over an infinite amount of time, which does not require my presence. It is not my fault if you can't read. Regardless t...
September 23, 2017 at 14:08
I could die this very day, and at the very least I am going to die of old age. You can't use use empty variables to explain everything, they have to b...
September 23, 2017 at 13:56
I'll refer you to the question I asked Tim.
September 23, 2017 at 13:31
All of science is about attempting to make predictive models including statistics.
September 23, 2017 at 13:28
Whose death?
September 23, 2017 at 01:49
It is the interaction of the two.
September 23, 2017 at 00:15
I am aware and ready to live with the outcome of my actions. That is the only way to have true freedom.
September 22, 2017 at 23:08
I never promised to be reasonable.
September 22, 2017 at 23:05
As far as I am aware statistics was created by humans. I guess I could be wrong maybe a magical statistics fairy zapped it into existence.
September 22, 2017 at 23:00
Here, let me show you how I solve people who repeatedly engage in such misdirection.
September 22, 2017 at 22:48
I can clearly see you are now playing a game. You are not that slick.
September 22, 2017 at 22:47
Ya, I am not playing. What is the difference between choosing and making? Really? Even a non-statistician knows their differences between the two. You...
September 22, 2017 at 22:44
Ya, I am not buying that act at all. Unless you think a null distribution is divinely supplied by the god of statistics.
September 22, 2017 at 22:25
This is rapidly getting very tedious, and now I feel you are just purposely being obtuse.
September 22, 2017 at 22:12
There is a difference between choosing and making.
September 22, 2017 at 22:09
As I said, off the mark.
September 22, 2017 at 21:49
Yet my question was not how to choose a distribution.
September 22, 2017 at 21:44
Personally I don't think you are making the connection here, I mean at certain points you are in agreement with me and I don't think you realize that....
September 22, 2017 at 21:10
So over an infinite amount of time, do you think there is a chance I might adopt a poor diet and as a result become overweight?
September 22, 2017 at 20:55
I You are and have been avoiding my question.
September 22, 2017 at 20:37
Tell me, how do you plan on making your probability distribution without data?
September 22, 2017 at 20:06
Btw, for those looking in repeated random events are the actual data.
September 22, 2017 at 19:04
Even Monte Carlo depends on repeated random events. All of statistics does.
September 22, 2017 at 19:02
Wait I am getting a new reading from my crystal ball, the mean is definitely 13.
September 22, 2017 at 17:46
Do you plan to just guess your numbers? I think the mean is 12, yep 12 just feels right.
September 22, 2017 at 17:41
Btw, I would very much like to know how you plan to do statistics without repeated random events.
September 22, 2017 at 17:25
I probably won't respond. This thread is about chance, and our discussion is relative to that. I see no reason to start another thread.
September 22, 2017 at 17:00
The repeated is how we approximate the true value.
September 22, 2017 at 16:57
Personally, I just think writing is not your strong suit. Tell me, how is this: Not the same thing I said? When I said:
September 22, 2017 at 16:49
Thanks for the reply, I'll have to examine it later when I have time for a response.
September 22, 2017 at 16:25
I treat everyone the same, I equally dislike everyone, you are not special to me, therefore I see no reason to treat you any differently. Also, I am n...
September 22, 2017 at 16:09
I have taken some probability mathematics and still have more to go. However, probability was defined in intro to stats, and has been echoed through a...
September 22, 2017 at 15:39
I am a 4th year statistic major, and to me it sounds like you are talking about deviation and not a probability distribution.
September 22, 2017 at 15:27
And what are your qualifications for making such an assessment?
September 22, 2017 at 15:23
I actually asked you if you wrote it or quoted it.
September 22, 2017 at 15:21
This sounds more like deviation. Did you quote that from somewhere or are those your own words?
September 22, 2017 at 15:07