You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Streetlight

Comments

You're like the Trump of philosophy. Ignoring all available evidence to shore up your terrible understanding of it.
January 04, 2020 at 11:30
Haha, no, it's a multi-course meal. From the Latin word gustus meaning taste. The same root word from which dis-gusting comes from.
January 04, 2020 at 10:31
Ha, I was just talking about something similar with a mate today - we figured the worst torture would be taking something you enjoyed and turning it a...
January 04, 2020 at 10:16
This isn't up for debate. Amateur etymology is no substitute for 2000 years of philosophical tradition because you want to push a moonshine philosophy...
January 04, 2020 at 09:18
To be fair, the distinction between 'being' and 'existence' is a well founded one that has its roots in Aquinas and alot of medieval Christian philoso...
January 04, 2020 at 06:12
"Feminists"? Name at least two who have written and published on this.
January 04, 2020 at 03:08
Those options are not particularly specific to the situation. Two far more relevant ones might be that both the Saudis and the Isrealis, for their own...
January 04, 2020 at 01:26
Can you please stop this. No one in philosophy limits the use of 'beings' to humans. This is just your idiosyncratic rubbish that no one but you spout...
January 04, 2020 at 00:51
There are enough threads going on Cantor and mathematical infinity right now with active discussion, we do not need another.
January 03, 2020 at 22:40
Odd. Fixed.
January 03, 2020 at 09:46
The OP seems to me to be a particularly bad idea. Part of the excitement of learning is to learn what you do not know - to understand one's own ignora...
January 02, 2020 at 21:27
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Ah right, now to make a grammatical abberation philosophical: "to be be, or to not be be?; that is the question".
January 02, 2020 at 02:07
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
*shrug* I'm not the one who doesn't know English.
January 02, 2020 at 02:02
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
The arrogation of logical terms into metaphysical posulates is a cardinal sin for which philosophers ought be be expelled from the academy for.
January 02, 2020 at 01:56
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Logic describes nothing. And translating predicates as 'attributes' is unmotivated and contentious.
January 02, 2020 at 01:52
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
This seems like linguistic sommersaults to me. A distinction without a difference for no purpose.
January 02, 2020 at 01:46
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
No seriously - if someone says: "describe this dog to me", and you reply "it's a dog", there are a few possibilities - you misheard the question; you ...
January 01, 2020 at 21:48
HNY!
January 01, 2020 at 11:39
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
In what English class did you learn that "x=x" or "it is itself" counts as a description of something, and not earn you a detention for being cheeky? ...
January 01, 2020 at 04:35
A distinction of provisional use, tends to be more obfuscating than clarifying, has led hundreds and thousands of people astray for the most part. Lik...
January 01, 2020 at 04:03
There are no inevitabilities in evolution, sans death.
December 30, 2019 at 01:52
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Yeah, exactly. That's why the idea self-identity speaks to anything at all without further specification is so silly. That it has some kind of univoca...
December 29, 2019 at 03:01
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
See. This is what happens when one hews to the principle of identity as some kind of metaphysical postulate. You have to leave the world behind. Relig...
December 27, 2019 at 23:32
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Totally. Insofar as one is setting out a grammar for logic, this makes total sense. But this speaks to a certain use of language - it certainly doesn'...
December 27, 2019 at 22:59
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Except this is totally wrong. An apple is an apple. It is also a fruit. That something is itself says nothing. It is semantically empty. As are all ta...
December 27, 2019 at 22:54
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Ok. That people have tried to wring conclusions from tautologies has always puzzled me. I remain puzzled.
December 27, 2019 at 17:17
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
If identity is 'representitive of distinction' then I simply don't know what you are talking about. Once words stand for their opposites, there are no...
December 27, 2019 at 17:15
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
You must be speaking another language I am unfamiliar with.
December 27, 2019 at 17:11
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
X=X is a representation of the fact... of distinction?
December 27, 2019 at 17:10
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Again: what does this mean? Babies certainly develop a sense of self, but an 'awareness that they are themselves'? What else would they be? What else ...
December 27, 2019 at 17:01
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
Math quite clearly employs the principle of identity in some regards. But to move from that to instilling it as some kind of anthrogenic principle - o...
December 27, 2019 at 16:41
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
One has to wonder what this could possibly mean. Abstracted from the idle speculations of bad philosophy, if one were to be asked in conversion: "do y...
December 27, 2019 at 16:13
End of year reading summary! 42 books, which is a little less than last year, but was definitely slowed down by the Cavell readings - The Claim of Rea...
December 27, 2019 at 10:55
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
“A thing is identical with itself.” - There is no finer example of a useless sentence, which nevertheless is connected with a certain play of the imag...
December 27, 2019 at 10:21
What handle would you like it changed to?
December 26, 2019 at 02:14
MJ is bae. Looking forward to reading it :D
December 25, 2019 at 12:21
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
:up:
December 25, 2019 at 02:32
This was not about having the skills to adapt or not. Orange deliberately placed staff in roles they were not suited or trained for, assigned tasks an...
December 25, 2019 at 01:08
Self Christmas gift(s) arrived :D /uploads/resized/files/el/v0jk46iw0wqhblv2.jpeg
December 23, 2019 at 10:11
Because laying them off would have required severance payouts. It was more economical to terrorize their employees into leaving than offering them red...
December 23, 2019 at 03:51
Thanks for all the quotes to confirm what I've said :)
December 21, 2019 at 01:10
Oy vey, off you go, Socrates.
December 21, 2019 at 00:21
If one or two excrescent lines of barely engaged questions amounts to 'critique' then I can only wish for better critics.
December 21, 2019 at 00:13
Except it is, which you would know if you knew anything about the subject whatsoever.
December 20, 2019 at 23:59
Great, because that's not what I claimed. Rather, the issue has to do with the specificities of language, and the total lack of any plausable account ...
December 20, 2019 at 23:58
My original post was reported by some sook and subsequently edited, so yeah, it's odd. Basically, I'm not here to explain basic debates in linguistics...
December 20, 2019 at 23:42
I had a more, er, robust response, but apparently telling you to educate yourself was not considered kosher. In any case, if your 'feelings' are what ...
December 20, 2019 at 22:46
Sure. I don't think it's worth my time. You show a bit of investment and I might consider it.
December 20, 2019 at 11:22
Capable yes; Willing, for someone who's parachuted in, no.
December 20, 2019 at 11:15