You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Streetlight

Comments

Mathematics is an interesting case, and is in fact one of the sources of Derrida's reflections here. Apart from his uni dissertation on Husserl, his e...
October 07, 2016 at 04:19
Ya, good point. I think this is right, which perhaps also explains in part the sudden appearance of Saussure at the end of the chapter (other than hel...
October 07, 2016 at 01:13
Its perhaps worth noting that the above line of thought is something Derrida will pursue in his Of Grammatology, published in the same year as VP. Her...
October 06, 2016 at 16:09
I didn't think much of this footnote when I read it, but now that you highlighted it, here's a crack at it: I think that Derrida is alluding - he does...
October 06, 2016 at 15:52
James Williams - Gilles Deleuze's Philosophy of Time: A Critical Introduction and Guide Henry Somers-Hall - Deleuze's Difference and Repetition: An Ed...
October 05, 2016 at 12:01
What's interesting though is that the approach of Husserl and Derrida to their work is in some manner reflected in their various philosophies themselv...
September 30, 2016 at 06:43
I remember reading somewhere (I can't remember where) that Derrida was told by his teacher Jean Hyppolite (one of the major progenitors of French post...
September 30, 2016 at 05:54
I get what you mean, though I think this is (partly) an issue with the book's structure. The first part of the book is given over to explicating 'the ...
September 30, 2016 at 05:08
The problem that Derrida will go on to tease out however - and this is more indicated in the first chapter than this one - is that Husserl will go on ...
September 29, 2016 at 08:07
Re: the last paragraph, it's aim seems to be to indicate the ramifications of Derrida's investigation, an attempt to explain how this seemingly trivia...
September 28, 2016 at 08:51
I'd be careful about reading the Lacanian subject in terms of 'recognition': recognition belongs to the register of the imaginary, and the imaginary i...
September 24, 2016 at 03:51
Very cool.
September 22, 2016 at 15:55
I think this can be accommodated by the ideas articulated in the OP, with some modification. It would require taking into account the plasticity of br...
September 22, 2016 at 08:54
The analogical approach to 'other minds' is a common approach, but is beset by a problem which is equally often pointed out: what motivates the applic...
September 22, 2016 at 02:15
I will post a very moving thread.
September 20, 2016 at 03:36
Please wait for chapter three! A lot of this stuff gets taken into account there, or at least, is made alot more explicit. May not solve anything, but...
September 20, 2016 at 03:24
This strikes me as correct and commensurate with Derrida's 'methodology' more generally: his deconstructions are always immanent critiques, and they t...
September 19, 2016 at 05:23
Conceive what?
September 19, 2016 at 01:05
Damn fine summary, think you got it all.
September 18, 2016 at 16:55
For what? In what context? To which ends?
September 18, 2016 at 02:03
Fair enough.
September 17, 2016 at 14:34
In the interests of keeping up momentum, might it be worth collapsing the reading weeks for chapters 1 and 2? Having just read over them, c2 is basica...
September 17, 2016 at 09:17
Heidegger is odd. When he wants to, he can be masterfully clear, and then, just as you think you've got a handle on things, he completely switches it ...
September 17, 2016 at 03:42
The question of individuation (how things come to be as they are) has always fascinated me, and it's probably what guides everything I do, philosophic...
September 16, 2016 at 06:48
But surely that the car is red is true for everybody (even colour blind people! They just don't see it as red). This could get messy now.
September 15, 2016 at 16:11
'Spose it depends whether or not you think taste is an inherently relational category. That is, to be tasty is by definition to be tasty for-someone. ...
September 15, 2016 at 15:41
But "liquorice is tasty" isn't true, or at least, it is neither true nor false.
September 15, 2016 at 15:23
But I thought we agreed that "liquorice is tasty" is shorthand for "liquorice is tasty for me"?
September 15, 2016 at 15:11
But it is true for everyone that I like liquorice. I mean, I don't, but y'know. Also I have nothing at stake here I'm just being a Socratic dick.
September 15, 2016 at 15:08
Would that make subjective truth a subset of objective truth?
September 15, 2016 at 14:11
Yes but (some ? all) yes?
September 15, 2016 at 14:09
Would that make subjective truth a subset of objective truth?
September 15, 2016 at 13:57
Maybe, but I'd imagine that 'truth' in that case would be something like "liquorice is tasty to me."
September 15, 2016 at 13:18
No, you're missing the point. I asked what kind of conceptual work the qualifier 'objective' in 'objective truth' does, and you replied that it means ...
September 15, 2016 at 04:31
Would truth that is not open to public demonstration be truth?
September 15, 2016 at 03:54
One wonders what kind of conceptual work the qualifier 'objective' in 'objective truth' does. Assuming that any other kind of 'truth' simply would not...
September 15, 2016 at 03:34
That's fair enough I think, and it's not the first time I've heard that line of reasoning used. As with any hot potato, I think there's always a degre...
September 14, 2016 at 15:27
Again, I'm simply not interested in policing the discourse of feminism in order to keep it in it's 'proper place'. Whatever my feminism is, it doesn't...
September 14, 2016 at 09:03
The issues you raise are important, but they belong as much to feminism as they do a critique from without. What I find unproductive is not your raisi...
September 14, 2016 at 07:35
Hi Vegabond, I appreciate where you are coming from but in truth, I find discussions such as the one you're promoting unproductive. My feminism means ...
September 14, 2016 at 06:14
Speaking for myself, I identify as a feminist - a male feminist - and I think it's important if only to normalize the term, to make it absolutely pede...
September 14, 2016 at 01:22
Pictures like that make me happy, haha. I should mention - not to burst your bubble! - that there's a newer translation of Ideas by Daniel Dahlstrom t...
September 13, 2016 at 10:02
Heh, the planning paradox seems to be almost exactly similar to the one that Freud encountered after postulating his pleasure principle: how to reconc...
September 13, 2016 at 03:04
I'm happy to provide 'technical advice' as it were, questions about terminology and so on. Note that it does get somewhat easier after the introductio...
September 12, 2016 at 06:17
Took a quick read though the introduction and there's a bit more assumed knowledge in there than I recall (it gets 'easier' when the book 'starts' pro...
September 10, 2016 at 08:44
Lost it, Un.
September 09, 2016 at 10:23
Yall need to remember that we're just a little forum run by guys and gals (?) who like a good philosophical yarn once in a while. We aren't an institu...
September 09, 2016 at 10:09
Good, I prefer it that way. No it's not the 'oh it's all mysterious' that gets me, its more like in the face of: 'look what we can say if we take this...
September 09, 2016 at 07:39
OK some prelim: it's 7 chapters plus an introduction of about 10 to 15 pages each, not including the translator's introduction (for the Lawlor transla...
September 09, 2016 at 07:04
Because I think it's utterly ridiculous - and I'm not just being polemic, I really find it completely incredulous - that when we can show the grounds ...
September 09, 2016 at 06:35