You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

If I were to take exception to anything, I would think science is at least partially reductionism-driven, insofar as science should always seek the si...
June 12, 2020 at 20:55
Lots of cool stuff in there, which I can appreciate. I wonder what terminology you’d use to classify the different orders of reality; I know what I’d ...
June 12, 2020 at 15:58
Yep. That’s what the law says. Right there, “M.P.N.P”, 1687, Book1, pg 20, “Axioms or Laws of Motion”, depending on which edition/translation is refer...
June 10, 2020 at 22:45
And experience. Ever tried to push a car on an icy street? Even if the car had a SaranWrap hood and you disfigured it with the pressure of your hands,...
June 10, 2020 at 12:53
My thoughts exactly. Failed chemistry lab? Struck out with that blonde in Mrs. Sherman’s French class? Oh. Wait. Never mind.
June 10, 2020 at 11:58
A most touching vocalization of simple words, from Gregg’s “These Days”.......written by Jackson Browne when he was only 16, which I would never have ...
June 10, 2020 at 11:48
Yeah....me too. Seems I would move backward and the ship would pretty much stay put. Even with Newton’s law, there’s zero force on the ship if all the...
June 10, 2020 at 10:42
Two things: it is said we have a naturally given “internal sense”, and, if a logical argument is consistent with itself and non-contradictory, conclud...
June 10, 2020 at 00:21
Your (synthesis2( appearance + understanding))) I would change to phenomenon + understanding. Imagination synthesizes the representation “appearance” ...
June 10, 2020 at 00:05
Yours, and a veritable HOST of like-minded individuals. Which is fine, each must hold to himself.
June 09, 2020 at 22:47
But Polyphemus, being blind as the proverbial bat, was easily fooled by a simple ruse. Humans in general, likewise easily fooled, still have the capac...
June 09, 2020 at 19:00
I certainly wouldn’t deny this assertion. Nevertheless...... .......while unproblematic as a proposition under those stringent conditions, forces the ...
June 09, 2020 at 15:06
My understanding of time (and space): That which at least one apparent intelligence has developed from itself, specifically for the use of itself.
June 09, 2020 at 12:41
Not an advocate of a priori knowledge, huh? Are we to maintain that it is impossible to know anything that isn’t first perceived?
June 05, 2020 at 18:19
Not sure Rene would go for that; it is my understanding that he intended the “I” of “...therefore I am” to be necessarily conditioned by the “cogito”....
June 05, 2020 at 10:52
How would that be arranged, that escape? Ontology of mind and body? The study of the origin and existence of mind and body? If the mind/body dualism i...
June 03, 2020 at 13:39
Probably; “Bucky balls” give an interference pattern, and they are monstrous compared to elementary particles. If they’re still people, why wouldn’t t...
June 03, 2020 at 09:47
I submit it is altogether impossible to escape the subject/object dichotomy, or dualism. Can’t re-enter what’s never been vacated. Metaphysically spea...
June 02, 2020 at 21:57
The only way to analyze concepts is with other concepts; the human representational system knows no other way. If it be granted the definition validat...
June 02, 2020 at 21:50
If that, then the synthesis of them should follow, or, the synthesis of them and something else subsumed under them, in order to complete a method. Fo...
June 02, 2020 at 12:41
Maybe it’s as simple as finding no profit in questioning the experience of our observations. Perception presupposes existence, therefore to question e...
June 02, 2020 at 11:50
“....it must still remain a scandal to philosophy and to the general human reason to be obliged to assume, as an article of mere belief, the existence...
May 30, 2020 at 12:37
What’s the difference? Rules may become public, but they never initialize publicly. ————- Categorical error: rules are not necessarily related to trut...
May 25, 2020 at 23:05
The rules of chess....or rules for anything else for that matter, along with laws, imperatives, principles, maxims, a veritable plethora of logical gu...
May 25, 2020 at 14:42
To which you are most certainly entitled. ————- Sorry.....I edited and didn’t notice I deleted (CPR A849/B877). ————- I realize that, yes. “Rule”, ”be...
May 25, 2020 at 11:06
Hmmm......yes, my mistake; there always an exception to the rule. Things may be re-learned due to brain or mental malfunction. But philosophy has to d...
May 24, 2020 at 12:23
Two things: something is stored somewhere, and, nothing is ever learned twice. One may incorporate those into either a scientific or philosophical the...
May 23, 2020 at 22:51
I agree, in accordance with the theoretical tenet that reason is a conscious mental activity. That which happens on the other side, is not reason per ...
May 23, 2020 at 20:48
“...CHAPTER III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason. By the term architectonic I mean the art of constructing a system. Without systematic unity, our kn...
May 23, 2020 at 19:06
Maybe. Or maybe those coming after foisted such “synthesis” on him. He certainly didn’t acknowledge such synthesis as his philosophical intent, that I...
May 23, 2020 at 14:06
There is a transcendental argument which says reason is the entirety of the human cognitive system, from perception to knowledge, so at least some peo...
May 23, 2020 at 00:52
In the synthesis of the two, are we not then left with one of two inevitable conclusions: either there are times in our conscious living when we don’t...
May 22, 2020 at 11:53
So....”What” is the answer to that question.....satisfies the query? I’m ok with that; I just left out the rest of the declarative.
May 21, 2020 at 20:32
Odd, isn’t it? The answer is given in the query, but stating the answer extinguishes the query. What’s the older version?
May 21, 2020 at 20:15
What.
May 21, 2020 at 20:05
What role does reason play....wherein lays its weight....in humans generally, from a psychological point of view?
May 21, 2020 at 19:58
Lyrics need edit.
May 17, 2020 at 20:52
Judge conflicting opinions with something of demonstrably greater certainty.
May 13, 2020 at 19:54
I dunno, man......awful lot of free-thinking there, but with a conspicuous lack of method to justify it. I’m sure you understand, that for people who ...
May 13, 2020 at 10:54
Sure, I can see that. Mighty big if, and, would require a certain kind of sentient being. On the other hand, in order for your “me” to remain an obser...
May 12, 2020 at 21:03
So.....no causa sui? With respect to moral systems based on an autonomous will, rather than ethical theories based on cultural norms, I mean. Not very...
May 12, 2020 at 15:45
I pretty much agree with your argument, but here, mightn’t it be said we chose immorally, rather than irrationally? Reason does obligate, but merely s...
May 12, 2020 at 14:24
See Chalmers, 2004, “Representational Character of Experience”, pt 6 (on Russell), and 7 (on Frege).
May 12, 2020 at 12:06
I see you removed the false proposition “all possible propositions are necessary”. Every proposition, that is, all subject/copula/predicate compositio...
May 12, 2020 at 11:11
Understood. Thanks. So how does any of that relate to time and existence?
May 11, 2020 at 23:03
Ok....so....thought is the conflict between two states.......of mind? There are two conflicting states of mind, which can be used as the definition of...
May 11, 2020 at 22:31
Technically everything is relative to the subject which apprehends, except whatever one chooses to represent his self, re: ego, “I”, consciousness.......
May 10, 2020 at 22:47
One is certainly permitted to think whatever he likes, so if you think the C.I. is an improved golden rule, far be it from me to argue the thought. Ar...
May 10, 2020 at 18:21
Given this from 1785...... “...Let it not be thought that the common "quod tibi non vis fieri" could serve here as the rule or principle. For it is on...
May 10, 2020 at 13:44
Which is fine, thinking folks been so inclined for millennia. Still, beware the greatest danger to radical-ness, self-contradiction.
May 10, 2020 at 11:54