You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

Ehhhhh.....I don’t do advice. But I can tell you, without experience, you’re usually gonna lose. Books. And more books. Always books.
March 22, 2021 at 23:20
Free will is not a thing, hence cannot meet the criteria regarding knowledge of its reality. Best I can say is, there is free will if one needs there ...
March 22, 2021 at 23:08
Errrrr....no it isn’t. It does not follow from the fact that not everything is known, that everything is possible. I mean....it’s not possible to know...
March 22, 2021 at 22:44
People can choose who they want to be all day long. Choosing and attaining are two completely different things, though, right? Can I choose to want to...
March 22, 2021 at 22:22
Nahhh. Using a chainsaw is a skill. If a human is a member of a certain class of carbon-based intelligence, then the being of human, is a condition of...
March 22, 2021 at 21:46
In matters of skill, I agree. But you asked about knowledge of being human, which is more than a skill. Why isn’t it the case that I must be human in ...
March 22, 2021 at 21:32
Not asking. Listening. Your initial statement, your follow-up exposition.
March 22, 2021 at 20:57
Interesting. Care to say more?
March 22, 2021 at 20:43
I hold no reverence for the human race in general, even if I’ve been acquainted with some fine individual members of it. I’m going with predication so...
March 22, 2021 at 20:41
There is not a transcendental ego, per se. If it is affirmed that there is a conception under which all my representations are united, and it is calle...
March 22, 2021 at 16:46
What do you suppose the character is independent of? What does axiomatically independent really say?
March 22, 2021 at 15:57
Just agreeing with you. However we each come to our conclusions doesn't matter all that much.
March 22, 2021 at 14:42
Smacks of suicide, and I ain’t done yet, so......no.
March 22, 2021 at 14:34
That’s exactly the opposite of what the first antinomy says. FIRST CONFLICT OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL IDEAS. THESIS. The world has a beginning in time, an...
March 21, 2021 at 23:05
The truth of that will be overshadowed by the effort required to direct anybody to it.
March 21, 2021 at 13:58
I’m good. You stipulated material universe, so.....hard to miss.
March 20, 2021 at 22:38
Either it is possible, or, it didn’t happen. There are mysteries of which physicists are aware, but that ain’t one of ‘em.
March 20, 2021 at 22:16
I am obligated only not to be the cause of suffering. It is not my duty to reduce suffering, although I may or may not be inclined towards it.
March 20, 2021 at 18:03
I live in the West, and I maintain that I am as free in the pursuit of my inclinations as my conditions permit, so.....yes.
March 20, 2021 at 17:48
So what....I played fast and loose with “same principle”. I still see no evidence that you grasped the intention of the paragraph, but rather, misdire...
March 17, 2021 at 22:28
Sensation of the representation implies representation comes before the sensation, which is backwards. Sensation is a physical event; representation o...
March 17, 2021 at 14:44
To a degree, yes, limited by technology and natural law. Metaphysics is limited only by logic, so as long as the logic holds, what metaphysics does, c...
March 17, 2021 at 14:35
Victory....over what?
March 17, 2021 at 12:56
Neither sensation of the-representation-not public, nor, sensation of the representation-not public, is a fix. Sensation of the....is empty; sensation...
March 17, 2021 at 12:11
Wow. None but the most daring intellectual acuity could excavate that from what I wrote.
March 17, 2021 at 12:04
Yep. Ownership of the car, possession of the sensation. Same principle. Not believe. Logically speculate. Not in subconscious. In understanding. Not m...
March 16, 2021 at 21:47
“....For how is it possible that the faculty of cognition should be awakened into exercise otherwise than by means of objects which affect our senses,...
March 16, 2021 at 14:02
Language games? A phone cannot be in your hand, it can only be held by your hand. The cause of pain can be in your hand (arthritis) but can also be he...
March 16, 2021 at 12:21
Simply put....there are no feelings intrinsic to a purely empirical statement, in the same way I do not have a feeling about the water I may or may no...
March 15, 2021 at 23:32
Yes, that’s standard modus operandi for theoretical science. At the same time, it is the cum hoc ergo propter hoc logical fallacy in theoretical philo...
March 15, 2021 at 14:07
Guess we’ll never know. Sworn to secrecy and all.
March 14, 2021 at 23:27
Does this not contradict itself? If reason is reserved for conscious processing, which is granted, and if much of the modeling is unconscious, how can...
March 14, 2021 at 17:47
I’m not sure about “all else”, but in the interest of a science of thought, the text has psychology, which is normative in that its propositions conta...
March 13, 2021 at 16:07
“...Furthermore, it provides a mathematical specification of ‘what’ the brain is doing; it is suppressing free-energy. If this uses gradient descent, ...
March 13, 2021 at 13:08
Nature itself, no. Since Hume, understanding events as parts of a whole, does not necessarily grant understanding of the whole. Technically, knowledge...
March 12, 2021 at 15:15
If everybody should be a philosophy-sovereign......how could it be taught? That which is taught is philosophizing by one to the receptivity of another...
March 12, 2021 at 13:37
Create our own new.... What better inkling of “private” could there be? “Create our own new” is merely speechifying synonyms for inventive, individual...
March 12, 2021 at 12:58
“criteriological” pg 118. New one on me. Got a nice ring to it, much cooler than “normative”.
March 11, 2021 at 16:44
I certainly agree with that, so....good enough. Thanks.
March 11, 2021 at 12:13
This is closer to the matter. Despite popular literature, Kant didn’t so much unite the two, as to show, beginning with himself, how they couldn’t hav...
March 10, 2021 at 11:06
Now THAT’S a comeback worth a decent chuckle right there. I appreciate it.
March 09, 2021 at 18:34
True enough. Some logical arguments conclude sound inferences, some do not.
March 09, 2021 at 18:28
Yep. Circularity. Never provable, but refutable, by merely invoking different majors or minors. Start here, you get epiphenomenalism; start there, you...
March 09, 2021 at 16:30
Common courtesy mandates a response, so......Thanks.
March 09, 2021 at 14:31
Circular. Not contradictory. With respect to illusion. 1.) The mental model of the brain..... that determines brain workings..... which determines men...
March 09, 2021 at 13:43
I’m non-committal, but I might eavesdrop from behind the fake rubber tree.
March 08, 2021 at 22:55
Ordinary parlance, yes. Presuppositions, yes. I’m sure you wouldn’t contradict yourself as obviously as this last seems to contradict the first, so I’...
March 08, 2021 at 22:35
Ahhhhh....Ok, gotcha. Reasons for assuming presuppositions. All those are sufficient reasons for assuming presuppositions, experience being my persona...
March 08, 2021 at 19:35
I guess I’d first have to ask what you mean convention, consensus, to be the primary reasons for. Spontaneity and those are very far apart, so just wo...
March 08, 2021 at 17:19
Yeah.....(chuckles to self).....I’m trying really hard to stay in the proper lane.
March 08, 2021 at 16:52