You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

schopenhauer1

Comments

They can't relate to my concern, but perhaps to the injustice of a no opt out game.. The harm one subjectively feels is precisely what I am saying is ...
October 08, 2021 at 04:33
Because in the end, my stance doesn't promote and condone no opt out situations.. See this very thread for anticipated response (aka happy slave respo...
October 08, 2021 at 04:30
To be anti-work is to acknowledge that you are in a no opt out game, which is indeed an injustice. Not playing along with the de facto forced situatio...
October 08, 2021 at 04:28
Oh boy, I can predict the usual peanut gallery on this forum so well... Insert trivialization of the issue as.. right... here: Insert red herring of i...
October 08, 2021 at 04:02
The political agenda is one of seeing enacted someone "dealing with" the challenges of life . This game is inescapable, and one cannot opt out with di...
October 08, 2021 at 02:05
Amen...But don't worry an anecdote is coming to try to correct you displaying the "exception that proves the rule" of course :roll:
October 08, 2021 at 01:57
I mistakenly quoted the wrong thing, that first quote should read: This was a reply to @"Michael". I have updated the post to reflect that quote.
October 07, 2021 at 13:39
I already predicted this kind of response previously in this thread. Yes, that is repeating essentially what I said here: The game of life itself (or ...
October 07, 2021 at 13:32
My whole point is that work is an injustice because it is an inescapable you are putting someone else in that can't be opted out without completely di...
October 07, 2021 at 13:08
Oh, you want to opt out? You see te irony right?
October 07, 2021 at 12:46
Don't put more workers (people who have to work) into the world in the first place. Thus, The chains are the existential situation itself though.
October 07, 2021 at 08:12
It is when creating more workers. Nothing is done in a vacuum. Clearly something is enacted by being born (workers working.. "flourshing" you say).
October 07, 2021 at 08:11
This is it in a nutshell. You get it.
October 07, 2021 at 08:09
I don't want to wave this off as a naturalistic fallacy. I know what you are saying.. It is somehow what we "should be doing" as designated by "nature...
October 06, 2021 at 22:22
Glad to be in good company :D.
October 06, 2021 at 22:19
But to put more people into the situation of would be wrong until that problem is solved.
October 06, 2021 at 22:18
Gotcha.. I thought this line: Was saying, sort of even though they were "right" he still chopped the wood cause of the reasons he provided uniting avo...
October 06, 2021 at 20:35
Same answer as Tom above.
October 06, 2021 at 20:34
So, I should say "forced work". If you don't garden and you die or starve as a result, then that is what I am talking about. Whatever you must do othe...
October 06, 2021 at 20:33
So naturalistic fallacy then?
October 06, 2021 at 20:32
I'm not hung up on the term "game". It is an unavoidable set of challenges (some known, some unknown based on factors of cause/effect/contingency). So...
October 06, 2021 at 19:58
How so? The structures are in place (see "throwness" in Existential thought). The iterative structures in place create its own game (socio-political-e...
October 06, 2021 at 19:18
That's about applying statistical models inaccurately to real life situations. Not quite the same. So in my case, not to be taken literally. Rather, i...
October 06, 2021 at 19:03
This is where I think we disagree. Even as you decry one form of exploitation (Capitalism) you turn away from another (forced game of life). Like the ...
October 06, 2021 at 18:16
So the tramps go penniless cause the wood chopper was cheap :razz: . But more seriously, besides that most work does not unite the two, the fact of wo...
October 06, 2021 at 17:32
So are you just pro work or anti anti work?
October 06, 2021 at 17:30
Added more.
October 05, 2021 at 16:36
To create someone and have them go through challenges for no reason other than “views life as some grand thing” is still wrong. Not an excuse to make ...
October 05, 2021 at 16:26
So you are bordering on my previous thread about the "forced game". There is no way around the need for survival, which requires some system of work a...
October 05, 2021 at 13:30
@"darthbarracuda", I added more.
October 01, 2021 at 15:08
But see isn't this your argument. I am making the case in another thread that life is indeed a "forced game". Whether or not the contestants are happy...
October 01, 2021 at 12:23
@"darthbarracuda"@"DingoJones" I am going to see this similar to the "Happy Slave" scenario. A slave is put in the unjust situation of being limited i...
September 30, 2021 at 07:49
Stacey is in pain. Is that a fact or an opinion?
September 29, 2021 at 13:23
I can posit an alternate theory here.. Homo sapiens generally have identities. Once something gains an identity, it starts to become less likely (more...
September 27, 2021 at 16:35
Very good. Now how about no one asking you what to do, but doing it to you anyways, to you?
September 25, 2021 at 07:51
So the problem you're going to run into in all of this is people will always object to the objective component. They will just ask for a regress "Why"...
September 24, 2021 at 21:53
Come to this thread then :D. Forcing someone into the game's agenda...I would never impose though.. so only view if you want. https://thephilosophyfor...
September 24, 2021 at 21:23
What information where you referring to? I didn't see a link.
September 24, 2021 at 20:37
@"Down The Rabbit Hole" @"TheSoundConspirator" So I'm trying to develop the idea of more than just the "collateral damage" of the minority who view it...
September 24, 2021 at 17:48
I think you might be taking that metaphor too literally. To the extent that we are using "group think" I think you are correct. We often nag each othe...
September 23, 2021 at 11:29
Not sure about this. People make the decision. Things aren't brought into existence by simply "external forced" doing it on their own.
September 23, 2021 at 02:43
There could be an argument made that not procreating is the most just because there could never be something enacted upon someone else unnecessarily a...
September 23, 2021 at 01:44
And this is the basis of the asymmetry.
September 22, 2021 at 18:58
Right, but there is some way that this state of affairs is good or better than the other.
September 22, 2021 at 15:26
Interesting sci-fi spin on it. However, let me bring it back to the main point.. What is it about forcing people to play a game, with various obstacle...
September 22, 2021 at 13:44
So much of this OP was about how procreation is unnecessarily creating people that will be forced to work. The unnecessary part here is that, prior to...
September 22, 2021 at 05:35
Right, there is a way that preventing the planting of a bomb that would hurt a future person(s) is "good", even if there was no person alive to be awa...
September 22, 2021 at 05:14
Yes it does, but someone just doesn't get to a lava pit by itself. Someone had to arrange that before hand.. Let's say the intent was there, and you h...
September 21, 2021 at 19:25
Why should that matter? According to your logic, if the person didn't exist at time X, then it doesn't matter the outcome at time Y?
September 21, 2021 at 19:15
None of this is relevant. The agency is the parents, not proto-genetic material. What "caused" this sequence of events to take place. It is like the t...
September 21, 2021 at 19:01