They can't relate to my concern, but perhaps to the injustice of a no opt out game.. The harm one subjectively feels is precisely what I am saying is ...
Because in the end, my stance doesn't promote and condone no opt out situations.. See this very thread for anticipated response (aka happy slave respo...
To be anti-work is to acknowledge that you are in a no opt out game, which is indeed an injustice. Not playing along with the de facto forced situatio...
Oh boy, I can predict the usual peanut gallery on this forum so well... Insert trivialization of the issue as.. right... here: Insert red herring of i...
The political agenda is one of seeing enacted someone "dealing with" the challenges of life . This game is inescapable, and one cannot opt out with di...
I already predicted this kind of response previously in this thread. Yes, that is repeating essentially what I said here: The game of life itself (or ...
My whole point is that work is an injustice because it is an inescapable you are putting someone else in that can't be opted out without completely di...
I don't want to wave this off as a naturalistic fallacy. I know what you are saying.. It is somehow what we "should be doing" as designated by "nature...
Gotcha.. I thought this line: Was saying, sort of even though they were "right" he still chopped the wood cause of the reasons he provided uniting avo...
So, I should say "forced work". If you don't garden and you die or starve as a result, then that is what I am talking about. Whatever you must do othe...
I'm not hung up on the term "game". It is an unavoidable set of challenges (some known, some unknown based on factors of cause/effect/contingency). So...
How so? The structures are in place (see "throwness" in Existential thought). The iterative structures in place create its own game (socio-political-e...
That's about applying statistical models inaccurately to real life situations. Not quite the same. So in my case, not to be taken literally. Rather, i...
This is where I think we disagree. Even as you decry one form of exploitation (Capitalism) you turn away from another (forced game of life). Like the ...
So the tramps go penniless cause the wood chopper was cheap :razz: . But more seriously, besides that most work does not unite the two, the fact of wo...
To create someone and have them go through challenges for no reason other than “views life as some grand thing” is still wrong. Not an excuse to make ...
So you are bordering on my previous thread about the "forced game". There is no way around the need for survival, which requires some system of work a...
But see isn't this your argument. I am making the case in another thread that life is indeed a "forced game". Whether or not the contestants are happy...
@"darthbarracuda"@"DingoJones" I am going to see this similar to the "Happy Slave" scenario. A slave is put in the unjust situation of being limited i...
I can posit an alternate theory here.. Homo sapiens generally have identities. Once something gains an identity, it starts to become less likely (more...
So the problem you're going to run into in all of this is people will always object to the objective component. They will just ask for a regress "Why"...
Come to this thread then :D. Forcing someone into the game's agenda...I would never impose though.. so only view if you want. https://thephilosophyfor...
@"Down The Rabbit Hole" @"TheSoundConspirator" So I'm trying to develop the idea of more than just the "collateral damage" of the minority who view it...
I think you might be taking that metaphor too literally. To the extent that we are using "group think" I think you are correct. We often nag each othe...
There could be an argument made that not procreating is the most just because there could never be something enacted upon someone else unnecessarily a...
Interesting sci-fi spin on it. However, let me bring it back to the main point.. What is it about forcing people to play a game, with various obstacle...
So much of this OP was about how procreation is unnecessarily creating people that will be forced to work. The unnecessary part here is that, prior to...
Right, there is a way that preventing the planting of a bomb that would hurt a future person(s) is "good", even if there was no person alive to be awa...
Yes it does, but someone just doesn't get to a lava pit by itself. Someone had to arrange that before hand.. Let's say the intent was there, and you h...
None of this is relevant. The agency is the parents, not proto-genetic material. What "caused" this sequence of events to take place. It is like the t...
Comments