You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

schopenhauer1

Comments

It's clear you didn't really read my previous post in much detail as I believe my responses from my last post still stands so I will refer you to that...
July 22, 2023 at 23:14
Granted. And perhaps "comfort is a preference" is something innate. A dog rather sleep in dry place than the rain. I have no problem with that idea. G...
July 22, 2023 at 20:52
Yep, pretty much agree there. Variation leading to selection through population niche in the environment. Well now you are putting the cart before the...
July 22, 2023 at 20:32
I think I can agree with all or most of this and still retain it is mostly stories all the way down (in the case of humans). Babies also have an innat...
July 22, 2023 at 20:02
:rofl: Definitely. But I asked an even more radical question in a post above. I'll just quote the whole post here though because you may have some com...
July 22, 2023 at 19:53
Yet homeless learn to do it, and the ones that like the lifestyle prefer um, "urban camping" (and not saying all or most homeless people do of course)...
July 22, 2023 at 19:30
Reminds me of E.O Wilson's theory of Biophilia.
July 22, 2023 at 19:17
Reproduction is another complex scenario of biology interplaying with sociology and culture. There isn't a clean cut answer. How do you know the origi...
July 22, 2023 at 19:05
So the questionable part is not if human brains were directed by evolutionary forces. Rather, it is whether certain contents of our thoughts and suppo...
July 22, 2023 at 17:19
Changed title
July 18, 2023 at 16:32
Sure but isn't that basic cognitive psychology? Evolutionary psychology tries to go beyond that to how. With EP, it is basically trying to figure out ...
July 18, 2023 at 15:39
Yawn. I don’t care about righteous indignation. The question is the question. Deal or go away.
July 18, 2023 at 06:23
We can do that. I am not saying we shouldn't, but it is a competing idea amongst many, so this is more a critique as to how efficacious it is in this ...
July 18, 2023 at 03:36
Yes it is plus infinity! As I said, it's a suitable "jumping off point", then provided more. I’m discussing it on a casual philosophy forum. Know your...
July 17, 2023 at 18:24
The New Yorker article is a good jumping off point from which I quoted heavily. Thanks Wayfarer. The Wikipedia article itself had some good ones. You ...
July 17, 2023 at 13:22
Yes, these are my thoughts on it too. Pretty much summarized it. :up:
July 17, 2023 at 13:14
I am you trolling nitwit. Read my other posts. If you want to make an argument instead of troll me then do so. Otherwise, you’re a hack of a hack. An ...
July 17, 2023 at 11:43
The exact nature of the evolved traits (what its origins are), and its attributions. See my post above: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comm...
July 17, 2023 at 04:52
Sure, possibly exaptations that were then coopted as adaptations. But this is so general that it really doesn't touch the realm of evopsych. Noam Chom...
July 17, 2023 at 04:50
I think it goes back to what I said in the here: But yes, I agree with your points about language. That is certainly something in our hardwiring. How ...
July 17, 2023 at 04:26
No. But is it amenable to science is the question. That article actually covers the general problems I am presenting. I think @"BC" kind of gets at it...
July 17, 2023 at 04:20
:ok: Eh, evolution related to physical artifacts, and biological systems, even perhaps cognitive systems. But more complex behavior? Much more of a gr...
July 17, 2023 at 03:09
Yes I am, and you're right, I don't care about being an outlier. However, when someone implies that something I am presenting is an outlier when it is...
July 17, 2023 at 01:41
Not sure if trolling? My point is that my point isn’t some crazy outlier.
July 17, 2023 at 01:13
@"plaque flag"! @"BC" @"apokrisis" @"Jamal" @"Paine" @"Janus"
July 17, 2023 at 00:09
Understandable, I think understanding human motivation and the human condition is valid. I do it all the time. Evo-psych basis for things is harder to...
July 17, 2023 at 00:05
Eek, that doesn't seem like good science.
July 16, 2023 at 23:39
Yeah, "formal". I wonder if anyone has ever written on this before..oh wait: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_evolutionary_psychology Plotki...
July 16, 2023 at 23:39
Psychology is too broad.. Freudian Psychology or Cognitive Psychology? A bit different. Evolutionary Psychology just seems to be something that is esp...
July 16, 2023 at 23:38
Other people are hell- Sartre wasn't wrong. Most people are narcissistic- they think their estimation of life, and their loneliness means more childre...
July 14, 2023 at 02:53
That would be Philipp Mainlander I bring up sleep, perchance to dream, because it is so discounted as a transcendent state. Often elusive, we all want...
July 12, 2023 at 21:03
Indeed, the ascetic goes even beyond the artistic genius who it is claimed, sees the eternal Forms. It is a full-blown denial of will. Everything inde...
July 12, 2023 at 16:30
Damn world of appearance! Indeed. What is serene detachment? Schopenhauer described it as thus (at the very end of Book IV):
July 12, 2023 at 05:00
@"plaque flag", where did you go?
July 12, 2023 at 04:49
I wasn't referring to Nirvana per se. I was referring to the idea that Schopenhauer was world-denying rather than stoic or other such similar-looking ...
July 12, 2023 at 03:32
Indeed. Much of life is enduring. Sleep is best. But sleep cannot be forced. So then there is meditation or just learning to sit quietly in an empty r...
July 11, 2023 at 15:39
It's hard to classify him, but these are the things that make it hard to really get at. I think he is saying that it is all illusions of mind, and tha...
July 10, 2023 at 21:16
Even more, he's a fullblown Idealist. Indirect Realists think there is "something" material external to mind but it's perceived in some constructed wa...
July 10, 2023 at 17:36
It's the direct realist idea that the brain is just a mirror "catching" reality (such as the objectivity of time and space) and reflecting it back.
July 10, 2023 at 15:27
Schop has a unity: Will. Schop tries to explain a plurality: Forms There is never really a good explanation of how Will is objectified into Forms, or ...
July 10, 2023 at 15:22
Oddly pretty accurate actually. I wanted more jargony and technical. Math equations and statistics, and engineering problems, and farming, and clothes...
July 10, 2023 at 04:34
You can't ignore consciousness though when talking about us. A sun is "working" no? A river? A human produces stuff to keep its metabolism going, a wh...
July 10, 2023 at 04:32
Good points. Well, I did start a thread called "Entropy and Enthalpy" and asked what the ethical implication is. As predicted, the minutia mongering o...
July 10, 2023 at 04:02
Certainly, but this would be antithetical to Schop's main point regarding materialism, that it doesn't properly account for the inner dimension of min...
July 10, 2023 at 03:48
Whence the Forms from Will? Whence Objectification of Will into Forms? And "whence" is time, space, causality turning that into the "kaleidoscope" of ...
July 10, 2023 at 03:38
I think it's funny that the atomism of Western society only focuses on economic institutions. It creates its own self-contained nihilism. If we take a...
July 10, 2023 at 03:34
It's not worth considering, but it's worth mentioning. The very fact that the good comes with such unknown (and very objectionable negatives) should n...
July 09, 2023 at 04:40
Not this guy:
July 09, 2023 at 04:31
Oh it is as you say, which is why sometimes secondary sources are fine for me. I don't need a bunch of wrong attempts at psychology and science stretc...
July 09, 2023 at 04:22
I'm reminded of Eduard Hartmann:
July 09, 2023 at 01:42