You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

schopenhauer1

Comments

Yes, I worried about this because it is out of some Providence and Reason that the ethical actor does their moral deeds, not out of compassion, which ...
November 17, 2015 at 02:06
It is nihilistic to not recognize the instrumentality of things and deem it as bad. If everything is radical contingency (I don't necessarily believe ...
November 17, 2015 at 02:00
This just doesn't ring true to how life works though. We are always going to be annoyed or disappointed at something. As TGW said, it seems more a rhe...
November 17, 2015 at 01:39
How is life better off with unpleasantness? If you are going to do the "exercise makes us feel better even if it hurts.." routine, just don't. You kno...
November 16, 2015 at 06:00
Is this about Stoicism? Please explain how it connects. But, to answer your position more directly, why is unpleasant not bad? No one can scrap suffer...
November 15, 2015 at 22:48
I can take a stab at a criticism of Stoicism. Stoicism seems: a) inaccessible in practice for some b) wrong due to its emphasis on being disconnected ...
November 15, 2015 at 19:40
I very much agree with your characterization of Stoicism. If you can elaborate on a couple more things: How would you suppose that the pessimist's adm...
November 15, 2015 at 06:01
Fair enough, and I think you made a good point that not all philosophies are going to resonate with everyone. I guess part of my post was to ask wheth...
November 15, 2015 at 04:33
You'd have to unpack that statement as it is riddled with assumptions.
November 15, 2015 at 03:44
I personally don't think any position is sufficient. I guess another position of some pessimists is that nothing will really work, there are only many...
November 15, 2015 at 01:55
Yes, I've seen it. I made a post a few years ago about the difference between common and philosophical pessimism and Thorongil also had some good post...
November 15, 2015 at 01:24
Generally speaking, this would be something of the following: 1) Not procreating or creating a new generation that will suffer. 2) Asceticism to deny ...
November 15, 2015 at 01:10
I am using it in the philosophical pessimistic sense, not the common sense.
November 15, 2015 at 01:06
They do think that life has suffering at the least, and their answer, if I was to boil it down to a slogan is "be indifferent to situations one cannot...
November 15, 2015 at 01:05
@"Sapientia" said: I don't deny these things; and I'll readily admit that I've personally experienced them at times. I view these things as things to ...
November 15, 2015 at 01:03
Can you elucidate the differences in the sophomoric complaining of the temperament vs. philosophical pessimism? Also you had some posts a while back o...
November 12, 2015 at 23:38
The optimist has to contend with the idea that disturbing the "peacefulness of nonexistence" (TOTALLY A METAPHOR PEOPLE! NOT A METAPHYSICAL STANCE- AN...
November 11, 2015 at 12:44
This is a misconception. Schopenhauer does have suggestions to mitigate suffering (mainly aesthetic contemplation, compassion for fellow-sufferers, an...
November 10, 2015 at 10:51
I feel quite the opposite. I think pessimism is understanding that the deficits of life cannot be coped with. I don't think many things will get rid o...
November 10, 2015 at 10:18
I think Thorongil's quote at the beginning describes the dispositions well: Pessimists don't want to have to deal with the flux in the first place. Th...
November 10, 2015 at 04:19
Thank ye, Benkei! Yours as well! Yes, you might be right about the static ideal as he scorned Will which, practically speaking, is a stand-in for flux...
November 06, 2015 at 16:28
Yes, it does makes sense. I see your argument. I am not going to do the same old arguments by trying to refute it (not yet anyways), so I am going to ...
November 05, 2015 at 15:53
This so far is not the compassionate synthesis I was hoping :P . However, to elaborate, I think that there might be two forms of suffering going on he...
November 04, 2015 at 14:35
I think the quoted remark works either way. If the point of carrying out life is to make meaning through living, as you indicated, or if it the summum...
November 04, 2015 at 14:15
I am not quite sure what you mean that "utilitarian consequences of a moral judgement are nil." If life's restless nature (always becoming) is (mostly...
November 04, 2015 at 12:20
Hi Benkei, I hope you are doing well. I think they integrate in the idea of existential angst. While Benatar is more of a classic utilitarian, Schopen...
November 04, 2015 at 07:06
But that isn't a mission for antinatalism, just a consequence of preventing other's from suffering. What you would have to justify is that a new indiv...
November 03, 2015 at 09:19
I think that Schopenhauer's description of restlessness is one of his best points. The emptiness one feels and the constant-goal seeking rings very tr...
November 02, 2015 at 16:06
I don't think Schopenhauer's meta-level analysis of suffering creates suffering. He is just describing it. I don't feel suffering because I read Schop...
November 02, 2015 at 03:44
I don't mean that philosophical pessimism automatically comes about, I am saying that the idea is a result form dealing with life's problems, not that...
November 01, 2015 at 08:26
I am not proving it necessarily follows necessarily. I was more reiterating what Thorongil was mentioning in his initial post for why philosophical pe...
November 01, 2015 at 01:57
The fact that we have to deal with life in the first place leads to philosophical pessimism. The fact that we are dealing with it, is just a given if ...
October 31, 2015 at 23:55
I don't think this adequately answered my last post which was this: You must explain in non-self-referential language what you mean by "we love God".....
October 30, 2015 at 01:01
Now, this has gotten more convoluted. You must explain in non-self-referential language what you mean by "we love God".. and "God cannot love us back"...
October 29, 2015 at 23:56
This sounds a bit odd being that you accused Schopenhauer of anthropocentrism. It looks like here Spinoza is anthropomorphosizing "Nature". Why should...
October 29, 2015 at 23:51
I will take this into account, thanks. Even if it is not math per se, his use of geometric proof and wanting to have an intellectual love of god indic...
October 29, 2015 at 23:36
I can accept the totality of contingency, but I think he conveys a truth-like phenomena which is to say that we are never completely contented. He did...
October 29, 2015 at 22:29
I do not think Schopenhauer meant by restless that we are anxious for a future event, but that each moment in time we are never fully satisfied or sat...
October 29, 2015 at 11:45
That life is suffering is an argument that we are always deprived. This (I think) was Thorongil's point in one of his posts- the natural lack of somet...
October 29, 2015 at 04:17
@"Agustino" @"Thorongil" Schopenhauer and Spinoza had more in common than some (even Schopenhauer himself) suspected. Schopenhauer's denial of "will" ...
October 28, 2015 at 23:52
As stated before, history proper is not just chronicling of events, but interpretation. One can have a bunch of primary sources and secondary sources,...
October 23, 2015 at 20:21
Thanks for the welcome.
October 23, 2015 at 14:31
History is an interpretation of past events, not just the chronicling of events. Therefore, not all things that happen in historical time are "history...
October 23, 2015 at 01:49
I'm posting this to show that I am on this forum as well. Hello everyone.
October 22, 2015 at 03:42