You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

schopenhauer1

Comments

I have my own definition that I've used on this forum for that concept. We suffer from many things, including people, environment, circumstances, our ...
December 09, 2016 at 09:10
Instrumentality.
December 09, 2016 at 01:40
And what then?
December 08, 2016 at 14:35
I'm not sure you are making a valid point based on what I said. A God that has a purpose and design we can never know is a relatively moot one. As I s...
December 07, 2016 at 10:24
Yes, a typical answer provided by the major religions. It cannot even be knowable except through past prophetic figures who actually talked with the b...
December 06, 2016 at 11:08
If the futility of putting more people into the world who must survive, make and pursue goals, and deal with contingent harms is not readily apparent,...
December 06, 2016 at 04:31
Deleted
December 06, 2016 at 01:29
Well, my point was that the outcome of antinatalism is not going to be realized anytime soon, but the questioning process itself can spark people to a...
December 06, 2016 at 01:08
So this is of course subjected to the same absurd conclusions- why does this whole training have to occur in the first place? If it is because God wil...
December 05, 2016 at 15:21
It's the needed part I'm perplexed at. I asked why we need to exist to redeem the universe, and we do not need an answer to that seems to be like me s...
December 05, 2016 at 09:44
I'm not sure what that means, or you are indicating that you aren't sure either.
December 05, 2016 at 09:29
Why we need to exist to perfect the universe he does not say. The exact question begging I bring up in other threads. There is no need for redemption ...
December 05, 2016 at 09:23
The actual outcome of antinatalism really has no great significance. It is rather the symbolic implication of what procreation stands for. Procreation...
December 05, 2016 at 01:25
I'm not sure man. What I do know is that there are people who either happen to have a pretty lucky life and they see themselves as having their needs ...
December 04, 2016 at 22:55
I'm trying to get a clear understanding of your views and I'm having a hard time piecing it together. It sounds like you are resenting the fact that y...
December 04, 2016 at 17:10
Yes, this is similar to Schopenhauer's idea of Will. We are desiring beings. Why do we desire to procreate more people so they can simply desire, I do...
December 04, 2016 at 13:37
I think Schop kind of sees it both ways. Will is unconsciously moving us forward (genetics, survival instincts), and Will also consciously moves us fo...
December 04, 2016 at 13:33
But my point is the vanity of existence itself becomes apparent even if everyone was "redeemed" (in whatever context that means). So for the secular h...
December 03, 2016 at 20:11
Yes, I agree with this assessment- to redeem to redeem to redeem does not make sense. Redeem for what? The purpose is obliterated once it is taken to ...
December 03, 2016 at 20:01
Sorry, I must have sent that without finishing. Those were good quotes. The one about following a story about our relation to the world seemed most re...
December 03, 2016 at 19:50
Yes, thanks for sharing as well. So I ask you, what is it about existence for?
December 03, 2016 at 04:31
As far as I see, there is the life lived without much stepping back and then the life that is reflected upon as a whole. If we step back an examine it...
November 29, 2016 at 10:08
Thresholds for boredom may get higher, but this does not mean boredom does not go away. As time progresses, given nothing to do for extended periods o...
November 28, 2016 at 16:02
Proof with academic journals? Probably not. But this is to already have a position where anything but scientific evidence does not count for "proof". ...
November 28, 2016 at 14:18
Ok, I'll accept that it's not an emotion. I was trying to communicate the phenomena, and if you want me to just call it something like an experience o...
November 28, 2016 at 12:12
From http://www.livescience.com/23493-why-we-get-bored.html The researchers, led by psychological scientist John Eastwood of York University in Ontari...
November 28, 2016 at 04:58
As far as boredom being baseline, that is controversial. As far as boredom being a psychological state, I wasn't aware that was controversial. Do you ...
November 28, 2016 at 03:29
But then it could still be a choice and not a necessity to exchange goods. But to wish the world had more scarcity just so you can get the pleasure of...
November 27, 2016 at 19:49
If you are self-employed and love what you do, could you do it without being paid for it? By work here, I mean getting a wage for labor. If that was t...
November 27, 2016 at 16:38
What is it saying about the human condition if we must choose between two non-ideal states? To be "managed", told what to do, stressed out, and/or bor...
November 27, 2016 at 16:33
You bring up something interesting in a post-work society. I'm going to bring that up as a topic.
November 27, 2016 at 15:49
Unstressed quiet, done long enough, leads to boredom.
November 26, 2016 at 21:08
Take away enough distractions, boredom will be there no doubt. There's only so much self-talk one can handle before one gets tired of oneself.
November 26, 2016 at 21:04
The work that goes into living- once a life is started, it is perpetual unto death. This is a simple truth, but the implication is one which I've quot...
November 26, 2016 at 21:01
I'd like to make a couple points to this. 1) At the least, "negative" stress, or distress, is not necessarily controllable. It can be managed under ce...
November 26, 2016 at 19:55
I say it like that not to reify stress as some tangible "thing" but to mark it out as a necessary component of being an organism. Organisms must endur...
November 26, 2016 at 18:30
Okay, but I'm not arguing that you cannot feel this way or that (nor can I), I'm just arguing both a) that it is not some sort of binding mission on e...
November 26, 2016 at 18:12
Yeah, I completely disagree. All stress is harmful, and true people can be naturally/socially inclined to become more stressed than others. I do not s...
November 26, 2016 at 16:47
Your presumption here is that, even for adults, if they are not able to get even these subtleties, simple pleasures, and wider range of interests, the...
November 26, 2016 at 16:39
To take this a step further, being born is essentially being exposed to stress. One has to "deal" with things great and small, preferred and not prefe...
November 26, 2016 at 16:24
Well, here is where we are going to disagree as to the characterization of stress, which, if my OP has it right, is one of the two major defaults (bor...
November 26, 2016 at 15:55
How about the stress of being exposed to the harm in the first place? If looked at more closely, is even the self-imposed stress of games/sports/enter...
November 26, 2016 at 15:23
In: Work  — view comment
I said this in a previous thread and it would apply here: As far as life is expressed by the work we do.. I don't know, that's a pretty romantic visio...
November 20, 2016 at 20:21
I don't think so. I think by being brought into existence you are exposed to many harms and stress. We MUST put forth energy. There is no default slee...
November 19, 2016 at 15:10
This is correct, nothing does resolve the situation. You are stuck here until you're not. You will run into harm, you will create your own harm, you w...
November 18, 2016 at 23:24
I disagree. We were born into existence, and it does contain harms and it contains a structure which we did not create. We all cope, that's just a tru...
November 18, 2016 at 23:22
Why, this is the way we seem to be structured based on our constant willing nature.. we have survival needs and we have entertainment needs/wants to k...
November 18, 2016 at 08:42
If you do not want to read all those thread, I'll copy and paste the first paragraph about instrumentality: Here is the idea of instrumentality- the a...
November 17, 2016 at 10:18
I basically go over what you are trying to get at in these threads. You may want to check them out and if you want to discuss any of the points, espec...
November 17, 2016 at 10:03
I didn't mean it's wrong because it is in vogue.. If Schopenhauer was in vogue, he wouldn't be wrong.. People would just be more right :D. But what I ...
November 15, 2016 at 13:30