You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Metaphysician Undercover

Comments

In: Infinity  — view comment
Well, I can't say I understand exactly what you are proposing, but it seems like you are saying the question of the medium is secondary, but then you ...
January 24, 2026 at 13:06
In general, large business is advantageous to the government. There are many reasons, but it's easier and more efficient for the government to have th...
January 24, 2026 at 02:25
In: Infinity  — view comment
I think it must be both. The theoretical mathematicians who practise what they like to call pure mathematics want to be free from the constraints of t...
January 23, 2026 at 13:41
In: Infinity  — view comment
This is an interesting remark. Many would say that "space" is conceptual only. And if it is, how could it be anything other than the way we represent ...
January 23, 2026 at 01:03
January 22, 2026 at 22:22
I see the point. If thousands of protesters are being shot, then the "bullshit pretext" is easily seen. If it's just the odd one here and there, it's ...
January 22, 2026 at 13:53
Protesters are domestic terrorists. That looks similar to what the regime in Iran would say. Look at those poor drug runners, blown up in their boats....
January 22, 2026 at 13:20
In: Infinity  — view comment
Huh? Someone in my head knows more about mathematics than I do? Isn't that contradictory? Obviously then, the description is wrong. The approach to th...
January 22, 2026 at 13:01
Riding the bed. That doesn't sound so bad to me. When they get the flying cars out, I'm going to jump in, say "take me home", and lie down for a good ...
January 22, 2026 at 03:15
In: Infinity  — view comment
I don't agree with that interpretation, because along with "countably infinite" there is "uncountably infinite". Furthermore, Banno produced the proof...
January 22, 2026 at 03:08
In: Infinity  — view comment
I wouldn't call the contradiction "formal", because it's not explicit as a statement of X and not-X. However, i see it as implicit, and unavoidable fr...
January 21, 2026 at 14:44
I know I'm answering a question not addressed to me, but you say "start" to erode. That happened a long time ago, for numerous reasons. A person like ...
January 21, 2026 at 13:31
In: Infinity  — view comment
We're still not on the same page, because I claim contradiction within the system, therefore I cannot conclude that the existence claims are valid. Th...
January 21, 2026 at 13:17
In: Infinity  — view comment
It's not even an issue of does math, or does math not exist. We are talking about whether we have an accurate description of it. To assign a name "exi...
January 20, 2026 at 14:45
In: Infinity  — view comment
I'm glad you're back. The issue of platonism is more about the existence of any bijection in general, and the question of whether a measurement exists...
January 20, 2026 at 01:06
In: Infinity  — view comment
i don't consider this to be a solution, because the result is the uncertainty principle. What you indicate is two distinct concepts of space which are...
January 19, 2026 at 18:41
In: Infinity  — view comment
That's exactly right. To say that 2 is between 1 and 3 is to say that it serves as a medium. However, in the true conception and use of numbers, 1, 2,...
January 19, 2026 at 14:00
In: Infinity  — view comment
This issue is more complicated though. The Neo-Platonists took Plato's name and claimed to continue Plato's school, but their ontology is consistent w...
January 19, 2026 at 03:40
In: Infinity  — view comment
I agree. but my spell check doesn't like little p platonism. And, I count the distinction as unimportant because there really would be no such thing a...
January 19, 2026 at 03:11
I'm kind of surprised that he didn't just make his own.
January 19, 2026 at 03:02
In: Infinity  — view comment
You got it bro! We measure the object not the measurement tool. The standard metre cannot be measured. Numbers are the tool, not the thing to be measu...
January 19, 2026 at 02:50
I suggest lots of maple syrup. Better than flan.
January 19, 2026 at 02:45
In: Infinity  — view comment
I can't really follow anything you are saying. Again, "integer" is a faulty concept, because it assumes that "a number" is a countable object. That's ...
January 19, 2026 at 02:39
In: Infinity  — view comment
Of course, why would say that? it's defined as infinite. That's the whole point. It is infinite and infinite is defined as boundless, endless, therefo...
January 18, 2026 at 15:05
In: Infinity  — view comment
No, that's not quite right. I reject the assumption of any "mathematical objects" finite or infinite, as Platonism, and unacceptable. It just happens ...
January 17, 2026 at 14:49
In: Infinity  — view comment
As I said, denial! When numbers are assumed to be mathematical objects, these objects simply exist independently of any human mind. The supposed objec...
January 17, 2026 at 13:56
In: Infinity  — view comment
You were claiming that numbers "exist", and how to be, is to be a value. Now you've totally changed the subject to "assigning a value". Sure, and thos...
January 17, 2026 at 02:52
In: Infinity  — view comment
Do you recognize that set theory is based in Platonism?
January 17, 2026 at 01:36
In: Infinity  — view comment
If, "to be is to be the value of a bound variable", then you are obviously talking Platonism. Anytime a value has being, that's Platonism. I'm amazed ...
January 17, 2026 at 01:25
Of course, in the car is the best hotbox going. I assume your driver has a respirator.
January 17, 2026 at 01:17
In: Infinity  — view comment
As I said, Platonism, which is an unacceptable ontology.
January 17, 2026 at 01:03
In: Infinity  — view comment
I demonstrated already, it's not a proper "proof" because it relies on a false premise. This produces your incoherent, unsound conclusion "we can prov...
January 16, 2026 at 13:27
I think that the problem is that I stated a specific problem. Then Paine produced a quote from Kant, which appeared like it sort of addressed the prob...
January 16, 2026 at 03:03
In: Infinity  — view comment
There's an ontology which presumes that numbers exist, it's called Platonism. It's been demonstrated to be a very problematic ontology, and many philo...
January 16, 2026 at 02:47
In: Infinity  — view comment
No, my apology too, I didn't intend to imply that you have done this, in particular. But I might mention@"Banno", and a few other members in the past....
January 15, 2026 at 20:34
In: Infinity  — view comment
You don't seem to understand the problem. "Countably" implies a procedure which you continue to deny. When we looked at the definition of "countable" ...
January 15, 2026 at 18:41
In: Infinity  — view comment
I can't, neither can you. Get the point? I know you said this, but I do not believe you . The concept of "capable" is very straight forward with very ...
January 15, 2026 at 15:08
Although Kant claims "a sufficient reply" in that passage, I don't think he provides that at all. The problem he says arises from an assumed "differen...
January 15, 2026 at 13:41
In: Infinity  — view comment
I don't see anything special about that word. Why do you think I should embolden it? That's right, we know, by the defining features of the system, th...
January 15, 2026 at 03:53
In: Infinity  — view comment
Here's an example to consider Esse. Would you say that someone is "capable" of producing the entire decimal extension of pi? If not, then why would yo...
January 15, 2026 at 00:36
In: Infinity  — view comment
Esse, please read what is written. I took the definition from a mathematics site, provided by a mathematician, jgill. The definition was "capable of b...
January 15, 2026 at 00:24
Don't worry about that, do the world a favour and recycle.
January 14, 2026 at 23:10
That is debatable, and it is really the issue I raised already about the difference between Plato and Kant. Plato allows the human mind direct access ...
January 14, 2026 at 13:48
In: Infinity  — view comment
That's right, "countable" means something very specific. But as I've demonstrated, the meaning of it, as defined, contradicts the meaning of 'the natu...
January 14, 2026 at 13:14
Havana syndrome was a significant debilitating illness, kind of like an extreme chronic migraine. Numerous people were inflicted at a few different lo...
January 14, 2026 at 03:13
In: Infinity  — view comment
That's not true. The definition of infinity I use is the one used in mathematics, to describe the natural numbers as unbounded, unlimited, without end...
January 13, 2026 at 22:56
How would you determine the numeric value of anything without comparison to a scale? That's what the instrument does, it applies the scale to the item...
January 13, 2026 at 14:48
In: Infinity  — view comment
I think this matter still has relevance. It is the issue of division. In reality, everything that we attempt to divide can only be divided according t...
January 13, 2026 at 14:14
In: Infinity  — view comment
I wouldn't characterize this as "worries". It doesn't worry me at all. I just reject falsity for what it is, and since this matter has little if any i...
January 13, 2026 at 03:09
You have requested a distinction between a "transcendental" understanding, and a "causal" understanding. Can you explain this difference better, for m...
January 13, 2026 at 01:51