You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Metaphysician Undercover

Comments

You seem to misunderstand the facts Agustino. The charge against him was indeed a charge of claiming to be the Son of God, but when asked if that's wh...
June 27, 2017 at 22:06
It is quite common in the Old Testament to see God referred to with the name "Father". It's actually in the Lord's Prayer. I think it's quite a stretc...
June 27, 2017 at 10:37
OK, suppose we remove this distinction then, between what is internal and what is external, because it is ambiguous. How would anyone justify any clai...
June 27, 2017 at 10:32
Extraterrestrials and ghosts are thought to be external entities, what if God shows His presence from within?
June 27, 2017 at 01:39
I really do not think that Jesus ever claimed to be Son of God. To my knowledge, he referred to himself as Son of Man. There are two distinct claims i...
June 27, 2017 at 01:35
Some might wish they were in your shoes, where 50K wouldn't even pay for the additional work of lifting a finger, but I'm happy to flip the bird for f...
June 26, 2017 at 23:51
OK, so planning, thinking, conceptualizing, contemplation, and things like this are not waking experience, because they are not perceptual experience....
June 26, 2017 at 23:39
The op is concerned with the difference between "true" and "truth". The difficulty with correspondence theory is that as much as it is concerned with ...
June 26, 2017 at 10:53
Yeah, I know you, we've been through this before, money doesn't motivate you to do anything, only force does. You don't lift a finger without being fo...
June 26, 2017 at 10:31
In my waking life there is a logical continuity of happenings. If I am walking down the street, in the next moment I will be continuing to walk down t...
June 26, 2017 at 02:09
I strongly disagree. In my experience the two are very different.
June 26, 2017 at 02:03
More than double is not a big difference?
June 26, 2017 at 01:59
The lucid dreamer I spoke to claimed to have some control over what was happening in the dream. When we go to a movie we do not even consider the poss...
June 26, 2017 at 01:54
Suppose that in a regular dream, what is being experienced in the dream is taken by the dreamer as being real, what is really happening. In a lucid dr...
June 26, 2017 at 01:34
What do you mean by "parallel to waking experience"? Daydreaming occurs while one is awake, it is an awake experience. I've done it many times and it'...
June 26, 2017 at 01:28
I don't agree that dream content is real in this way. The images in my dreams appear to be completely made up, and nothing I've ever experienced in my...
June 25, 2017 at 18:15
How could you not believe your dreams, while they are going on? That's the thing with dreams, they are apprehended as real, when they are going on, bu...
June 25, 2017 at 11:38
Believe it or not jorndoe, I am the same as you, Epicurean. I don't think I would ever get Humanism though, so I don't know how that works.
June 25, 2017 at 11:12
No, I don't think that's reasonable. Laws are put in place to protect the defined rights and freedom of individuals. Therefore they are not intended t...
June 25, 2017 at 02:38
Sorry, I don't believe in space-time. I think it's an unwarranted conflation of "space" and "time", which refer to two distinct aspects of reality.
June 25, 2017 at 01:03
That's about it, "nothing" has many different meanings dependent on the context in which it is used. In context, it always seems to mean something, so...
June 24, 2017 at 16:51
What makes a counterfactual true, is the same thing which makes any proposition true, how the words are defined. In most cases, correspondence is inhe...
June 24, 2017 at 12:15
I would say that nothing is impossible. Clearly we have something, and to create nothing from something is just as unlikely as to create something fro...
June 24, 2017 at 11:50
Right, it's not nothing, so to declare it as nothing is a false declaration.
June 24, 2017 at 02:26
I'm no physicist, but what the quantum vacuum principle demonstrates, is that within the context of a real world situation (i.e. within something), it...
June 24, 2017 at 01:45
In no way does the quantum vacuum state indicate that something comes from nothing. It indicates that what some people might think of as nothing, the ...
June 24, 2017 at 01:29
Which physicists would those be?
June 23, 2017 at 21:58
I think Michael's claim is that the counterfactual is true by virtue of some sort of logical principles. If you had two apples, and got another two ap...
June 23, 2017 at 17:43
. Well, I distinguish between thinking and reasoning, as reasoning, I believe, is a type of thinking, described by the definition I provided, "conclus...
June 23, 2017 at 13:40
No. I don't think most people would say that other animals reason. Animals think, but to reason is to think with the use of logic, which animals do no...
June 23, 2017 at 01:13
The problem is that you create ambiguity by using "mode of being" to refer to both "having and being". Having and being are distinct, as "having" refe...
June 22, 2017 at 11:10
To me, enforcement means forcing one to follow the rules. Payment for following the rules is not enforcement. Neither is not paying the person who doe...
June 22, 2017 at 01:34
Ok, so let's take this example then. In the work place, you can get people to do what your boss wants of them. Isn't it the case that the people are f...
June 21, 2017 at 11:12
You haven't given me much to reply to, Agustino, because you are changing what you have said, as you say more. You're a shapeshifter. And that's very ...
June 20, 2017 at 11:11
Do a google search under "climate change", you're sure to find it. I have no contempt for statistics, just the way that some statistics are produced a...
June 20, 2017 at 02:12
I can agree with this, but I would proceed to distinguish between reason and experience. If experience is limited to phenomena, then reason must be se...
June 20, 2017 at 01:43
Climate change is a very good example of the misuse of the word "science". The field consists of a vast body of material built upon unscientific premi...
June 19, 2017 at 11:10
I think that where the biggest problem lies is in the misuse of the word "science". Science has been so successful, it has a reputation of being nearl...
June 19, 2017 at 10:47
Actually, I didn't see Tim's reply to my post at the time, and I was sort of busy. Maybe I'll make a stab at a reply right now. How is it that an onio...
June 19, 2017 at 02:13
He's not a good business man if he invests so much that losing it will leave him unable to feed his family. These are all signs of bad business, and a...
June 18, 2017 at 22:47
We're talking about the risk which is directly related to the person's occupation. Those risks which you claim the owner is involved in, are unrelated...
June 18, 2017 at 12:04
Well, it could be relations between words and other things, what we call reference, or it could be relations between words and other words, what we ca...
June 18, 2017 at 11:16
No, I think meaning ought to be reified, and it can be reified so long as it is not understood to be any particular thing, it is more like relations b...
June 18, 2017 at 02:27
You two have a very twisted concept of "risk". The worker may be injured or die on the job. The owner of the business stands to lose some money, of wh...
June 18, 2017 at 02:15
How is it that putting up a whack of cash is called "risk"? If the money's lost there's no skin off the back of the billionaire, it's just a number in...
June 17, 2017 at 10:52
Since we know that we understand words with ideas and concepts, the real question is do the physical things which we refer to with words, exist, or is...
June 16, 2017 at 10:33
Yes, I think you're right because you are asking whether it's possible to know that you know. But this implies that you must also know that you know t...
June 16, 2017 at 02:08
As I recall the purpose of your thought experiment was to demonstrate a change which could be occurring without being relative to something else. If s...
June 15, 2017 at 00:27
In: Causality  — view comment
Yes, you observed my behaviour. Then you have a memory of my behaviour. The memory is an interpretation. You may use this interpretation when you make...
June 14, 2017 at 22:30
I explained it all to you, though you refused to acknowledge. You couldn't give me an example of a change which wasn't related to some other thing. Fi...
June 14, 2017 at 22:12