You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mongrel

Comments

I had two two-week prednisone bursts recently. It's magic. Unfortunately it won't do anything for Jackass Syndrome... obviously.
December 01, 2016 at 14:38
Possibly. I think Godzilla is actually an image of the US.. walking around eating cars...
December 01, 2016 at 13:04
OK
December 01, 2016 at 01:13
I don't imagine I have anything to teach you about Descartes' scenario. If we differ in our take on it, maybe it's a difference in what we think the c...
December 01, 2016 at 00:47
I asked how you know you aren't dreaming right now. What does it suggest.. that you don't simply answer the question?
November 30, 2016 at 22:11
Normal is fiction. Nobody lives there full time. Just 20 years ago, I'd say just about all the lesbians and bisexuals I knew were crazy in some way or...
November 30, 2016 at 19:45
LOL. Totalitarian flavor game. Chinese totalitarianism is Szechuan and bright yellow. French totalitarianism was lavender and juniper trees and their ...
November 30, 2016 at 18:11
Sorry... "In the dream, you asserted P." is true IFF in the dream, you asserted P. Did I assert P in the dream? Yes, I did. Problem?
November 30, 2016 at 18:03
Gay Science
November 30, 2016 at 15:03
"You said that P in the dream" is true IFF you said that P in the dream.
November 30, 2016 at 14:59
I'm going to get some bacon and eggs. How about that one?
November 30, 2016 at 13:57
PTSD sucks.
November 30, 2016 at 13:46
You'd say exactly the same thing in the dream if the question came up.
November 30, 2016 at 13:40
Among the table's properties is that you can fly off of it? But one can fly off a real table. A real table can change into something else. There may b...
November 30, 2016 at 13:40
Is there a difference between the dream table and the real table? What properties does one have that the other doesn't?
November 30, 2016 at 04:10
https://dp1eoqdp1qht7.cloudfront.net/community/projects/6a0/7d7/102950/1911835-o_19la26049bm7kf21a391c001g4r7-full.png Complete with blue meanies.
November 30, 2016 at 00:00
"In principle" is enough for a hefty argument. If it's true that there's nothing I might observe (even in principle) that would tell me whether I'm dr...
November 29, 2016 at 23:50
There's a "Get Creative" thread where you can put poems.
November 29, 2016 at 18:37
Well, anyway. I think Kant is a significant part of the conversation because AP is partly rooted in a reaction against Kant that flowed into an attemp...
November 29, 2016 at 17:55
Maybe you could help me understand your argument a little better. Kant noted the intuitiveness of Euclidean geometry. What's the next step in the argu...
November 29, 2016 at 17:03
Special Relativity is the one that does in absolute space. Kant beat Einstein to it (so did Leibniz, btw.. but that's beside the point.)
November 29, 2016 at 15:55
I also think this is a significant feature of the question's landscape. But isn't it that the idealist believes we shape the world by what we think? T...
November 29, 2016 at 15:06
Because my version is better.
November 29, 2016 at 06:27
Per Fine, it's a belief in a definite world structure and belief in epistemic access to this structure. Language regarding the mind-independence of wo...
November 29, 2016 at 06:05
I don't think so. An anti-realist denies that a statement of materialism can be truth-apt.
November 29, 2016 at 05:30
It probably calls for some narrowing down, otherwise pitting this nebulous realism against a very specific sort of idealism (the consequences of which...
November 29, 2016 at 01:17
I think that statement would make you a neutral apologist. To be a realist apologist, you'll have to make the case that realism is more successful or ...
November 28, 2016 at 20:17
What do Russians have? Vodka and snow?
November 28, 2016 at 01:02
So just be aware that although you may not like the concept of ontological dependence, that may be the concept in play in someone else's thoughts. I'm...
November 27, 2016 at 18:38
There's an SEP article on ontological dependence.
November 27, 2016 at 17:51
True. Maybe I could formulate it a little better... I'll work on it.
November 27, 2016 at 14:28
I wouldn't call it co-dependence because that term has a significant psychological meaning. Interdependence... yes. I disagree with you there. Probabl...
November 27, 2016 at 14:24
Well that's a challenge. Maybe write a play that starts off really well, things go really well and then the ending is joyous. Wouldn't it put people t...
November 27, 2016 at 01:16
Cuba si. Castro no.
November 27, 2016 at 01:12
But pathological situations are dramatic. From a certain point of view life is drama.
November 27, 2016 at 01:11
But why not? Could the nay sayer believe in dreams within dreams?
November 27, 2016 at 00:31
Distress may or may not be harmful. It's a reaction to something (at least potentially) harmful. Respiratory distress, for instance, means the body is...
November 26, 2016 at 20:14
We could start a thread to explore different sorts of ontological dependence.
November 26, 2016 at 15:18
The world's most famous perpetrators of infanticide were Chinese atheists under communist rule. Apparently buckets of water were kept at the bedsides ...
November 26, 2016 at 04:43
If the fleece could persist beyond the removal of the hay. It's not the definition of "world" you should be preoccupied with here. It's "dependent."
November 26, 2016 at 03:25
A bit of hay may adhere to the fleece. It doesn't mean the fleece is hay-dependent. (I'm shopping for a spinning wheel. Woo Hoo!) I'm not overly fond ...
November 26, 2016 at 01:42
In what context?
November 26, 2016 at 01:13
Just stipulate a definition and move on. What's wrong with that?
November 26, 2016 at 01:01
Leftist are just more sensitive to the possibility of crimes being committed against Muslims who live in their communities.
November 25, 2016 at 20:24
That was all pretty standard stuff per Scott Soames.... check out Understanding Truth. Awesome.
November 25, 2016 at 15:46
Why on earth did I used to think you were a cool person? Tendency to spout nonsense, I guess.
November 24, 2016 at 20:21
That's cool. I didn't realize how much of my life I spent just continually psychologically pushing back against US Cold War propaganda until I read a ...
November 24, 2016 at 17:17
Don't really have to.
November 24, 2016 at 15:39
"It's a terrible thing to lose your mind, or not have a mind." -- Dan Quayle
November 24, 2016 at 14:39
I agree.
November 24, 2016 at 01:02