You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

tom

Comments

Which is at the same intellectual level as almost all criticism of Trump you will encounter in the media. But then again, when you factor in that 95% ...
October 09, 2016 at 07:57
My next door neighbour's house has a footprint of 3m x 6m. Family with 6 kids lived there previously.
October 05, 2016 at 16:37
They are called "terrace houses" there, which have been minute since Georgian times.
October 05, 2016 at 11:53
I charge for reading comprehension and basic physics lessons.
October 04, 2016 at 21:15
Please provide links to the peer-reviewed literature substantiating your claim.
October 04, 2016 at 20:59
They don't have any evidence that brain processes involve quantum coherence. But yes, quantum mechanics is a universal theory.
October 04, 2016 at 19:13
Except that Popper completely disagreed with Bohr, and Bohr never said that.
October 04, 2016 at 19:09
It does not even begin to "prove" that the brain is quantum mechanical, let alone that even incidental quantum processes exist. http://www.sciencedire...
October 04, 2016 at 18:32
That certainly is not induction, which Popper showed to be a myth. Deducing singular statements from an existing theory for the purpose of testing has...
October 04, 2016 at 12:33
Do you have the references for that?
October 04, 2016 at 07:12
I think it means that abstractions are real, autonomous, causal, and as much a part of reality as anything else. Mostly, however, we gain knowledge of...
October 03, 2016 at 09:00
Some entities are purely abstract, like the set of prime numbers, but many abstractions are physically instantiated, and we are immersed in those. Eve...
October 03, 2016 at 08:58
We are "surrounded" by abstractions. It is impossible to explain reality without appeal to abstractions. E.g. we can't explain evolution without refer...
October 02, 2016 at 10:27
Well, you cant account for numbers that way. What you can account for, is what we are able to discover about numbers, which is determined by the laws ...
October 01, 2016 at 21:05
You clearly did not watch the video.
October 01, 2016 at 20:57
Maybe you should watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj3_KqkI9Zo
October 01, 2016 at 19:36
As I said, hypothetical alien monkeys aren't as well understood as numbers. But you refuse to discuss the odd and even numbers. The laws of physics ta...
October 01, 2016 at 14:22
Actually, you are not discussing an hypothetical situation, you are discussing a meaningless, impossible, unphysical, imaginary situation, in a differ...
October 01, 2016 at 10:26
There is absolutely no way an infinite number of anything of any size can occupy a finite space. Reality takes place in the continuum, which is Aleph1...
September 30, 2016 at 16:02
Which is of course false.
September 30, 2016 at 14:53
The set of all grains of sand, whatever colour is finite. The total number of particles in the visible universe is only 10^80! You appeared to be disc...
September 30, 2016 at 14:37
Even better, get your sand and set the monkeys to work!
September 30, 2016 at 13:30
I think that's a really good idea. Why not actually perform the experiment to prove your point? Once you have demonstrated it, mathematicians will hav...
September 30, 2016 at 07:47
This paper, for example, is about t=0 and it has 487 citations! http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2848
September 29, 2016 at 12:38
That is a (trivial) example of the mathematician's fallacy. Even in a reality that is only "comprised" of "0"s and "1"s, what exists in such a world a...
September 27, 2016 at 19:28
"The Cosmic Atom" was an essay published in 1957. 1927 is 30 years prior to 1957. I don't recall anyone claiming that Einstein developed all the solut...
September 27, 2016 at 09:13
Your misrepresentation of the history of quantum mechanics is utterly woeful. So much so that it is difficult to summon the enthusiasm to correct you....
September 27, 2016 at 07:57
OK, taking you at your word, what phenomena and their "causes" does quantum mechanics describe? How did we discover quantum entanglement, superpositio...
September 26, 2016 at 21:21
New theories not only provide better explanations of reality, they explain why previous theories were successful or otherwise. Newton's gravity explai...
September 26, 2016 at 18:38
That is a common (mis)conception about the nature of science, but there is another conception - the conception developed by Karl Popper, which I prefe...
September 26, 2016 at 09:09
What is "scientific causation"? When you look at the fundamental laws of nature (the ones whose constants you claim we can't inquire about scientifica...
September 25, 2016 at 10:54
So, why did scientists look for the CMB?
September 23, 2016 at 22:05
Non-locality at the Planck scale? Are you for real?
September 23, 2016 at 10:37
Those are experimental loopholes to ensure that Axiom 3. is maintained. You can't claim that locality is being tested if there are conceivable ways in...
September 23, 2016 at 10:34
OK, let's take the Copenhagen Interpretation and Quantum Field Theory in turn. We can then move onto String theory if you like. The CI is a local anti...
September 23, 2016 at 09:54
Feels a bit like going round in circles, but no experiment ever performed closes the "freedom loophole", so single-world realist theories that are abs...
September 23, 2016 at 08:58
That's why I gave the axioms I listed earlier their proper name - axioms! Unfortunately the term "loophole" is used in two ways - to refer to the axio...
September 22, 2016 at 20:16
Does it really? How?
September 22, 2016 at 16:40
Quantum field theory is explicitly local. Copenhagen is local. Many Worlds is local. As a matter of fact it has been proved that QM is a local theory....
September 22, 2016 at 15:11
There is a contradiction produced by accepting the 4 axioms. The solutions are: 1 Axiom 4 is wrong, leading to Copenhagen or Many Worlds. 2. Axiom 3 i...
September 22, 2016 at 14:42
As I have pointed out more than once, the free will axiom is implicit in all of science, and is made explicit in quantum mechanics, particularly Bell'...
September 22, 2016 at 14:21
Since you refuse to provide the axioms of Bell's theorem, allow me: 1. Freedom of choice. The freedom to choose which experiment to perform independen...
September 22, 2016 at 09:32
Doe it take time to experience, or can you experience in the absence of time? If so, i.e. if time is an unnecessary component of experience, then how ...
September 22, 2016 at 09:18
What about time?
September 21, 2016 at 15:37
Is there a contemporary account of Jesus?
September 21, 2016 at 12:06
What does "reality-as-contunuum" mean?
September 21, 2016 at 11:51
What are the axioms of Bell's Theorem?
September 21, 2016 at 11:45
In Bell's ow words: Often the Free Will Axiom is called the "free will loophole", or the "free choice of detector orientations". I think you are missi...
September 20, 2016 at 19:53
I didn't say I don't know what it it is, I'm just not interested in arguing about what it is. Anyway, despite the accusations to the contrary, I have ...
September 20, 2016 at 09:20
You define what a mental state is, and I'll show you why the photon cannot possess it. Deal?
September 20, 2016 at 07:51