Again, how can there be change when there are no parts? Please, please, please! Answer the question! Explain to me the process in which something chan...
Because the idea of something existing when all of its properties cannot be differentiated from each other (the quality of difference does not exist) ...
If by separable parts you mean that it has parts but they cannot be by any means separated (I'm aware this would be the literal meaning of "separable ...
That's very true. Do you (or anyone) have by any chance writings on the kind of metaphysics we are talking about? I understand many ancient philosophe...
Imagine a pendulum hanging from your ceiling, for example. Let's assume the pendulum oscillates in two dimensions indefinitely without ever coming to ...
Could you explain that a little more? You mean that as relations to exist, it first presupposes "things" to exist as to get related? That's why you th...
I agree with Jerry here. I think variety/diversity is a "law of nature;" it is absolutely necessary that there exists more than one thing (it cannot b...
@"T Clark", although I do not have any papers on the topic, I would like to bring up a point that I think is often overlooked (I might be wrong here, ...
How can something that has no extension be able to have states, as in the states of mind? Are they states of an expanse-less thing? Try to imagine tha...
A while I ago I asked myself if there was a basic unit of thought, but I never really pondered about it. Your OP brought me back to it, and somehow I ...
Your post made me think about the following, but before I put it forward, I would like to state that it was thought based on the following premise, wh...
I am not convinced by what you bluntly and carelessly state in proposition number 2. I cannot say 2 is false or true simply because I am not able to f...
@"Bartricks" And I think you must show if our belief in normative reasons is actually evolving or not. If it is evolving, you need to show if it is ev...
@"Bartricks" Would you agree that reasons to do things are founded upon knowledge about the outcome of an action. For example, let's say a person woul...
It's impossible to understand. Your examples are very complex. No one can read your mind, and if you do not try to actually give simple examples is go...
Reasons to do things are dependent on evolution (a mind like yours must come up with them, and a mind is the result of an evolutionary process). Evolu...
Ok. Forgive me. I mean well. The thing is that I just cannot understand what you mean by reasons-to-do things. It seems to me that in your mind you pi...
The kinds of reasons you talk about are being caused. They are outcomes. That which you call a reason to do something is an outcome of a process and n...
The molecular machinery that keeps cells alive gets worn with time. It does not last forever and needs to be replaced. New molecules are made of nutri...
If I don't eat, the cells that make me will lack the nutrients required for the normal functioning of the molecular processes that maintain such cells...
A reason to believe something is not under evolutionary constraint directly, I think. If I understand correctly, these reasons you mention are complex...
Can you give an example of one of these reasons you talk about. The most simple you can think of. To be honest after reading and re-reading many of yo...
But such intuitions are rooted in sensory faculties which tell about something external. A sensory faculty, by definition, senses something outside it...
If we consider existence to be a group of properties (one or more, and any), then non-existence or nothingness would be the lack of all properties. It...
Man, this is one of those almost impossible questions. Sometimes I like to think everything is space, and the rest is just differences in space just t...
Comments